Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dhruba Borthakur
a143ef9b38 Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb
Summary:
Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb. This allows a single
application to link in open-source leveldb code as well as
rocksdb code into the same process.

Test Plan: compile rocksdb

Reviewers: emayanke

Reviewed By: emayanke

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13287
2013-10-04 11:59:26 -07:00
Rajat Goel
11c65021fb Revert "Minor fixes found while trying to compile it using clang on Mac OS X"
This reverts commit 5f2c136c32.
2013-09-15 23:01:26 -07:00
Rajat Goel
5f2c136c32 Minor fixes found while trying to compile it using clang on Mac OS X 2013-09-15 22:06:14 -07:00
Dhruba Borthakur
1186192ed1 Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.
Summary: Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.

Test Plan:
make clean; make check
make clean; make release

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12489
2013-08-23 10:51:00 -07:00
Mayank Agarwal
f1bf169484 Counter for merge failure
Summary:
With Merge returning bool, it can keep failing silently(eg. While faling to fetch timestamp in TTL). We need to detect this through a rocksdb counter which can get bumped whenever Merge returns false. This will also be super-useful for the mcrocksdb-counter service where Merge may fail.
Added a counter NUMBER_MERGE_FAILURES and appropriately updated db/merge_helper.cc

I felt that it would be better to directly add counter-bumping in Merge as a default function of MergeOperator class but user should not be aware of this, so this approach seems better to me.

Test Plan: make all check

Reviewers: dnicholas, haobo, dhruba, vamsi

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12129
2013-08-13 14:25:42 -07:00
Deon Nicholas
c2d7826ced [RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences.
Summary:
Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded
to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking
up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or
Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then
applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the
base/sentinel value.

I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to
take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters).
The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves
together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if
and only if the "associative-merge" fails.

This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general
case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain
efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure.

NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review,
revision, and testing. Feedback welcome!

Test Plan:
  -This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it.
  -I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests
(counters, string-append, and redis-lists)
  -I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb.
  -I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using
db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress.
  -I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable,
Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0,
Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found,
end-of-history, end-of-file, etc.
  -A lot of feedback from the reviewers.

Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
2013-08-05 20:14:32 -07:00
Haobo Xu
05e8854085 [Rocksdb] Support Merge operation in rocksdb
Summary:
This diff introduces a new Merge operation into rocksdb.
The purpose of this review is mostly getting feedback from the team (everyone please) on the design.

Please focus on the four files under include/leveldb/, as they spell the client visible interface change.
include/leveldb/db.h
include/leveldb/merge_operator.h
include/leveldb/options.h
include/leveldb/write_batch.h

Please go over local/my_test.cc carefully, as it is a concerete use case.

Please also review the impelmentation files to see if the straw man implementation makes sense.

Note that, the diff does pass all make check and truly supports forward iterator over db and a version
of Get that's based on iterator.

Future work:
- Integration with compaction
- A raw Get implementation

I am working on a wiki that explains the design and implementation choices, but coding comes
just naturally and I think it might be a good idea to share the code earlier. The code is
heavily commented.

Test Plan: run all local tests

Reviewers: dhruba, heyongqiang

Reviewed By: dhruba

CC: leveldb, zshao, sheki, emayanke, MarkCallaghan

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9651
2013-05-03 16:59:02 -07:00