Summary:
A fix similar to #4410 but on the write path. On IO error on `SelectBlobFile()` we didn't return error code properly, but simply a nullptr of `BlobFile`. The `AppendBlob()` method didn't have null check for the pointer and caused crash. The fix make sure we properly return error code in this case.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4580
Differential Revision: D10513849
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 80bca920d1d7a3541149de981015ad83e0aa14b5
Summary:
The old error message was misleading because it led people to believe the truncation operation failed.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4454
Differential Revision: D10203575
Pulled By: riversand963
fbshipit-source-id: c76482a132566635cb55d4c73d45c461f295ec43
Summary:
Fix IO error on read not being handle and crashing the DB. With the fix we properly return the error.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4410
Differential Revision: D9979246
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 111a85675067a29c03cb60e9a34103f4ff636694
Summary:
Currently, if RocksDB encounters errors during a write operation (user requested or BG operations), it sets DBImpl::bg_error_ and fails subsequent writes. This PR allows the DB to be resumed for certain classes of errors. It consists of 3 parts -
1. Introduce Status::Severity in rocksdb::Status to indicate whether a given error can be recovered from or not
2. Refactor the error handling code so that setting bg_error_ and deciding on severity is in one place
3. Provide an API for the user to clear the error and resume the DB instance
This whole change is broken up into multiple PRs. Initially, we only allow clearing the error for Status::NoSpace() errors during background flush/compaction. Subsequent PRs will expand this to include more errors and foreground operations such as Put(), and implement a polling mechanism for out-of-space errors.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3997
Differential Revision: D8653831
Pulled By: anand1976
fbshipit-source-id: 6dc835c76122443a7668497c0226b4f072bc6afd
Summary:
Fix the bug when sync log fail, FlushJob::Run() will not be execute and
reference to cfd->current() will not be release.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1792
Differential Revision: D4441316
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 5523e28
Summary:
Fixes compile error:
In file included from ./util/statistics.h:17:0,
from ./util/stop_watch.h:8,
from ./util/perf_step_timer.h:9,
from ./util/iostats_context_imp.h:8,
from ./util/posix_logger.h:27,
from ./port/util_logger.h:18,
from ./db/auto_roll_logger.h:15,
from db/auto_roll_logger.cc:6:
./util/thread_local.h:65:16: error: 'function' in namespace 'std' does not name a template type
typedef std::function<void(void*, void*)> FoldFunc;
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1656
Differential Revision: D4318702
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 8c5d17a
Summary:
Consider the following WAL with 4 batch entries prefixed with their sequence at time of memtable insert.
[1: BEGIN_PREPARE, PUT, PUT, PUT, PUT, END_PREPARE(a)]
[1: BEGIN_PREPARE, PUT, PUT, PUT, PUT, END_PREPARE(b)]
[4: COMMIT(a)]
[7: COMMIT(b)]
The first two batches do not consume any sequence numbers so are both prefixed with seq=1.
For 2pc commit, memtable insertion takes place before COMMIT batch is written to WAL.
We can see that sequence number consumption takes place between WAL entries giving us the seemingly sparse sequence prefix for WAL entries.
This is a valid WAL.
Because with 2PC markers one WriteBatch points to another batch containing its inserts a writebatch can consume more or less sequence numbers than the number of sequence consuming entries that it contains.
We can see that, given the entries in the WAL, 6 sequence ids were consumed. Yet on recovery the maximum sequence consumed would be 7 + 3 (the number of sequence numbers consumed by COMMIT(b))
So, now upon recovery we must track the actual consumption of sequence numbers.
In the provided scenario there will be no sequence gaps, but it is possible to produce a sequence gap. This should not be a problem though. correct?
Test Plan: provided test.
Reviewers: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, leveldb, dhruba, hermanlee4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57645
