Summary:
Added new target ##make analyze## into Makefile. This command runs clang static analyzer and builds the sources as ##make all##. The result report is put into ##$(RocksDbSourceRoot)/can_build_report/##
If the development environment is a Facebook devserver and ##ROCKSDB_NO_FBCODE## is not set, then scan-build is used from fbcode. If it is run not on a Facebook devserver, scan-build should be available in ##$PATH##. I'll add details to wiki how to install scan-build on a non Facebook devserver environment.
Test Plan:
Run the fallowing commands on a Facebook devserver and Mac OS, and ensure no build or test errors.
```
% make all check -j32
% make clean
% USE_CLANG=1 make all -j32
% make analyze
% USE_CLANG=1 make analyze
```
Reviewers: sdong, lgalanis, leveldb, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D32799
Summary: This was a feature request by osquery. See task t5617758
Test Plan: compiles and memenv_test runs
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D32115
Summary: Update the comment for the removal of mac-install-gflags.sh
Test Plan: n/a
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D32295
Summary: We need this because we build MySQL with 4.8.1.
Test Plan: ROCKSDB_FBCODE_BUILD_WITH_481=1 make check
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, rven, yoshinorim
Reviewed By: yoshinorim
Subscribers: jonahcohen, yoshinorim, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D32073
Summary: When you compile with COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1, we will compile the code with -fsanitize=thread. This will resolve bunch of data race issues we might have.
Test Plan: COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 m db_test
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D32019
Summary:
Upgrade gcc to 4.9.1 and clang to dev.
With new compilers I succeeded to run thread sanitizer, too. I'll post output (doesn't look good) and fix some things in separate diffs.
Test Plan: compiles with both g++ and clang
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D32007
Summary:
This diff changes compile to optimize for native platform by default. This will automatically turn on crc32 optimizations for modern processors, which greatly improves rocksdb's performance.
I also did some more changes to compilation documentation.
Test Plan:
compile with `make`, observe -march=native
compile with `PORTABLE=1 make`, observe no -march=native
Reviewers: sdong, rven, yhchiang, MarkCallaghan
Reviewed By: MarkCallaghan
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D30225
Summary:
We need to turn on -Wshorten-64-to-32 for mobile. See D1671432 (internal phabricator) for details.
This diff turns on the warning flag and fixes all the errors. There were also some interesting errors that I might call bugs, especially in plain table. Going forward, I think it makes sense to have this flag turned on and be very very careful when converting 64-bit to 32-bit variables.
Test Plan: compiles
Reviewers: ljin, rven, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: bobbaldwin, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28689
Summary:
Only one more try, I promise.
I talked to Jim and he mentioned that if we include our system includes with -isystem rather than with -I, that signals to the compile that those are system includes and thus no warnings are issued. So I turned our glibc includes into system includes and now we no longer get the warning from there, making us shadow-warning-free!
Test Plan: compiles with both clang and gcc
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, rven, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28479
Summary:
This diff is revamping our build tools:
1) Use third-party2 instead of third-party
2) consolidate clang and gcc scripts together, lots of duplication there
3) remove hdfs libs, we never compile rocksdb with them
clang compilation doesn't work yet. It doesn't work in master either. I plan to fix it soon, but I just spent 2 hours trying to make it work and failed. I'll ask experts.
Test Plan: compiles with gcc
Reviewers: ljin, yhchiang, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28047
Summary: as title
Test Plan: build with mock_env_test.cc
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28107
Summary:
This diff replaces BlockBasedTable in flush_job_test with TableMock, making it depend on less things and making it closer to an unit test than integration test.
It also introduces a framework to compile mock classes -- Any file named *mock.cc will not be compiled into the build. It will only get compiled into the tests. What way we can mock out most other classes, Version, VersionSet, DBImpl, etc.
Test Plan: flush_job_test
Reviewers: ljin, rven, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D27681
Summary: RocksDB already depends on C++11, so we might as well all the goodness that C++11 provides. This means that we don't need AtomicPointer anymore. The less things in port/, the easier it will be to port to other platforms.
Test Plan: make check + careful visual review verifying that NoBarried got memory_order_relaxed, while Acquire/Release methods got memory_order_acquire and memory_order_release
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, ljin, sdong
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D27543
Summary:
Before this diff, there are two places with rocksdb versions. After the diff:
1. we only have one source of truth for rocksdb version
2. we have a script that we can use to get the version that we can use in other compilations (java, go, etc).
Test Plan: make
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24333
Summary:
I put together a script to assist in the generation of deb's and
rpm's. I've tested that this works on ubuntu via vagrant. I've included the
Vagrantfile here, but I can remove it if it's not useful. The package.sh
script should work on any ubuntu or centos machine, I just added a bit of
logic in there to allow a base Ubuntu or Centos machine to be able to build
RocksDB from scratch.
Example output on Ubuntu 14.04:
```
root@vagrant-ubuntu-trusty-64:/vagrant# ./tools/package.sh
[+] g++-4.7 is already installed. skipping.
[+] libgflags-dev is already installed. skipping.
[+] ruby-all-dev is already installed. skipping.
[+] fpm is already installed. skipping.
Created package {:path=>"rocksdb_3.5_amd64.deb"}
root@vagrant-ubuntu-trusty-64:/vagrant# dpkg --info rocksdb_3.5_amd64.deb
new debian package, version 2.0.
size 17392022 bytes: control archive=1518 bytes.
275 bytes, 11 lines control
2911 bytes, 38 lines md5sums
Package: rocksdb
Version: 3.5
License: BSD
Vendor: Facebook
Architecture: amd64
Maintainer: rocksdb@fb.com
Installed-Size: 83358
Section: default
Priority: extra
Homepage: http://rocksdb.org/
Description: RocksDB is an embeddable persistent key-value store for fast storage.
```
Example output on CentOS 6.5:
```
[root@localhost vagrant]# rpm -qip rocksdb-3.5-1.x86_64.rpm
Name : rocksdb Relocations: /usr
Version : 3.5 Vendor: Facebook
Release : 1 Build Date: Mon 29 Sep 2014 01:26:11 AM UTC
Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: localhost
Group : default Source RPM: rocksdb-3.5-1.src.rpm
Size : 96231106 License: BSD
Signature : (none)
Packager : rocksdb@fb.com
URL : http://rocksdb.org/
Summary : RocksDB is an embeddable persistent key-value store for fast storage.
Description :
RocksDB is an embeddable persistent key-value store for fast storage.
```
Test Plan:
How this gets used is really up to the RocksDB core team. If you
want to actually get this into mainline, you might have to change `make
install` such that it install the RocksDB shared object file as well, which
would require you to link against gflags (maybe?) and that would require some
potential modifications to the script here (basically add a depends on that
package).
Currently, this will install the headers and a pre-compiled statically linked
object file. If that's what you want out of life, than this requires no
modifications.
Reviewers: ljin, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24141
Summary: I want to use open source build rather than fbcode one. This enables me to run `ROCKSDB_NO_FBCODE=1 make` and run it with my system g++.
Test Plan:
ROCKSDB_NO_FBCODE=1 make
make
Reviewers: sdong, ljin, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23613
Summary:
That way we can see when this graph goes up and be happy.
Couple of changes:
1. title
2. fix db_bench to delete column families before deleting the DB. this was asserting when compiled in debug mode
3. don't sync manifest when disableDataSync. We discussed this offline. I can move it to separate diff if you'd like
Test Plan: ran it
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22815
* Script for building the unity.cc file via Makefile
* Unity executable Makefile target for testing builds
* Source code changes to fix compilation of unity build
Summary:
Fixed some make and linking issues of RocksDBJava. Specifically:
* Add JAVA_LDFLAGS, which does not include gflags
* rocksdbjava library now uses JAVA_LDFLAGS instead of LDFLAGS
* java/Makefile now includes build_config.mk
* rearrange make rocksdbjava workflow to ensure the library file is correctly
included in the jar file.
Test Plan:
make rocksdbjava
make jdb_bench
java/jdb_bench.sh
Reviewers: dhruba, swapnilghike, zzbennett, rsumbaly, ankgup87
Reviewed By: ankgup87
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20289
Summary:
Changes:
- Adding numa_aware flag to db_bench.cc
- Using numa.h library to bind memory and cpu of threads to a fixed NUMA node
Result: There seems to be no significant change in the micros/op time with numa_aware enabled. I also tried this with other implementations, including a combination of pthread_setaffinity_np, sched_setaffinity and set_mempolicy methods. It'd be great if someone could point out where I'm going wrong and if we can achieve a better micors/op.
Test Plan:
Ran db_bench tests using following command:
./db_bench --db=/mnt/tmp --num_levels=6 --key_size=20 --prefix_size=20 --keys_per_prefix=0 --value_size=100 --block_size=4096 --cache_size=17179869184 --cache_numshardbits=6 --compression_type=none --compression_ratio=1 --min_level_to_compress=-1 --disable_seek_compaction=1 --hard_rate_limit=2 --write_buffer_size=134217728 --max_write_buffer_number=2 --level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=8 --target_file_size_base=134217728 --max_bytes_for_level_base=1073741824 --disable_wal=0 --wal_dir=/mnt/tmp --sync=0 --disable_data_sync=1 --verify_checksum=1 --delete_obsolete_files_period_micros=314572800 --max_grandparent_overlap_factor=10 --max_background_compactions=4 --max_background_flushes=0 --level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=16 --level0_stop_writes_trigger=24 --statistics=0 --stats_per_interval=0 --stats_interval=1048576 --histogram=0 --use_plain_table=1 --open_files=-1 --mmap_read=1 --mmap_write=0 --memtablerep=prefix_hash --bloom_bits=10 --bloom_locality=1 --perf_level=0 --duration=300 --benchmarks=readwhilewriting --use_existing_db=1 --num=157286400 --threads=24 --writes_per_second=10240 --numa_aware=[False/True]
The tests were run in private devserver with 24 cores and the db was prepopulated using filluniquerandom test. The tests resulted in 0.145 us/op with numa_aware=False and 0.161 us/op with numa_aware=True.
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, ljin, igor
Reviewed By: ljin, igor
Subscribers: igor, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19353
Summary:
As discussed in our internal group, we don't get much use of seek compaction at the moment, while it's making code more complicated and slower in some cases.
This diff removes seek compaction and (hopefully) all code that was introduced to support seek compaction.
There is one test case that relied on didIO information. I'll try to find another way to implement it.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: sdong, haobo, yhchiang, ljin, dhruba
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19161
Summary:
collect in-memory workload get/seek metrics so that we can alert on
regression
Test Plan: ran locally
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18969
Summary:
388d2054c7
added extra line to db_bench output, breaking regression tests. This diff makes it more robust and fixes the issue
Test Plan: ran it
Reviewers: ljin, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: sdong, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18897
Summary:
Newer gflags switched from `google` namespace to `gflags` namespace. See: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/139 and https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/102
Unfortunately, they don't define any macro with their namespace, so we need to actually try to compile gflags with two different namespace to figure out which one is the correct one.
Test Plan: works in fbcode environemnt. I'll also try in ubutnu with newer gflags
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18537
Summary: We have a lot of problems with gflags. However, when compiling rocksdb static library, we don't need gflags dependency. Reorganize INSTALL.md such that first-time customers don't need any dependency installed to actually build rocksdb static library.
Test Plan: none
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18501
Summary:
There are some projects in fbcode that define lz4 dependency on r108. We, however, defined dependency on r117. That produced some interesting issues and our build system was not happy.
This diff makes rocksdb work with both r108 and r117. Hopefully this will fix our problems.
Test Plan: compiled rocksdb with both r108 and r117 lz4
Reviewers: dhruba, sdong, haobo
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18465
Summary: Added benchmark functionality on the lines of folly/Benchmark.h
Test Plan: Added unit tests
Reviewers: igor, haobo, sdong, ljin, yhchiang, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17973
Summary:
Introducing RocksDBLite! Removes all the non-essential features and reduces the binary size. This effort should help our adoption on mobile.
Binary size when compiling for IOS (`TARGET_OS=IOS m static_lib`) is down to 9MB from 15MB (without stripping)
Test Plan: compiles :)
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, ljin, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17835
Summary:
I had to make number of changes to the code and Makefile:
* Add `make lib`, that will create static library without debug info. We need this to avoid growing binary too much. Currently it's 14MB.
* Remove cpuinfo() function and use __SSE4_2__ macro. We actually used the macro as part of Fast_CRC32() function.
As a result, I also accidentally fixed this issue: https://www.facebook.com/groups/rocksdb.dev/permalink/549700778461774/?stream_ref=2
* Remove __thread locals in OS_MACOSX
Test Plan: `make lib PLATFORM=IOS`
Reviewers: ljin, haobo, dhruba, sdong
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17475
Summary:
Added an option for readrandom benchmark to run with tailing iterator instead of Get. Benefit of tailing iterator is that it doesn't require locking DB mutex on access.
I also have some results when running on my machine. The results highly depend on number of cache shards. With our current benchmark setting of 4 table cache shards and 6 block cache shards, I don't see much improvements of using tailing iterator. In that case, we're probably seeing cache mutex contention.
Here are the results for different number of shards
cache shards tailing iterator get
6 1.38M 1.16M
10 1.58M 1.15M
As soon as we get rid of cache mutex contention, we're seeing big improvements in using tailing iterator vs. ordinary get.
Test Plan: ran regression test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, ljin, kailiu, sding
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: tnovak
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15867