Summary:
Single threaded tests -> sync=0 Multi threaded tests -> sync=1 by default unless DB_BENCH_NO_SYNC is defined.
Also added updaterandom and mergerandom with putOperator. I am waiting for some results from udb on this.
Test Plan:
DB_BENCH_NO_SYNC=1 WAL_DIR=/tmp OUTPUT_DIR=/tmp/b DB_DIR=/tmp ./tools/benchmark.sh debug,bulkload,fillseq,overwrite,filluniquerandom,readrandom,readwhilewriting,updaterandom,mergerandom
WAL_DIR=/tmp OUTPUT_DIR=/tmp/b DB_DIR=/tmp ./tools/benchmark.sh debug,bulkload,fillseq,overwrite,filluniquerandom,readrandom,readwhilewriting,updaterandom,mergerandom
Verify sync settings
Reviewers: sdong, MarkCallaghan, igor, rven
Reviewed By: igor, rven
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34185
Summary:
A command line like this to run all the tests:
source benchmark.config.sh && nohup ./benchmark.sh 'bulkload,fillseq,overwrite,filluniquerandom,readrandom,readwhilewriting'
where
benchmark.config.sh is:
export DB_DIR=/data/mysql/rocksdata
export WAL_DIR=/txlogs/rockswal
export OUTPUT_DIR=/root/rocks_benchmarking/output
Will fail for the tests that need a new DB .
Also 1) set disable_data_sync=0 and 2) add debug mode to run through all the tests more quickly
Test Plan: run ./benchmark.sh 'debug,bulkload,fillseq,overwrite,filluniquerandom,readrandom,readwhilewriting' and verify that there are no complaints about WAL dir not being empty.
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D30909
Summary: as title
Test Plan: ran it
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong, MarkCallaghan
Reviewed By: MarkCallaghan
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D25563
Summary: Try to match some parameters from Dhruba's benchmarks on github
Test Plan: ran it
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24687
Summary:
Hope these scripts will allow people to run/repro benchmark easily
I think it is time to re-run flash benchmarks and report results
Please comment if any other benchmark runs are needed
Test Plan: ran it
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, MarkCallaghan, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23139
