Summary:
Persistent cache feature caused rocks db crash on windows. I posted a issue for it, https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/6919. I found this is because no "persistent_cache_key_prefix" is generated for persistent cache. Looking repo history, "GetUniqueIdFromFile" is not implemented on Windows. So my fix is adding "NewId()" function in "persistent_cache" and using it to generate prefix for persistent cache. In this PR, i also re-enable related test cases defined in "db_test2" and "persistent_cache_test" for windows.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6932
Test Plan:
1. run related test cases in "db_test2" and "persistent_cache_test" on windows and see it passed.
2. manually run db_bench.exe with "read_cache_path" and verified.
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D21911608
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: cdfd938d54a385edbb2836b13aaa1d39b0a6f1c2
Summary:
This test was written like a stress test, using up to 3x26GB
RSS memory during parallel 'make check'. Now, while this code is mostly
dormant, I've made the "for Travis" versions of the expensive tests the
canonical versions and disabled the expensive versions. This has the
side benefit of removing some arbitrary conditional compilation.
For unknown reason, the super expensive tests were gated on
Snappy_Supported, which appears to be irrelevant, so I removed it.
The tests can be fixed / improved / migrated to stress test if/when they
are deemed important again.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6601
Test Plan:
make check + CI
./persistent_cache_test Before:
...
[==========] 10 tests from 2 test cases ran. (114541 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 10 tests.
YOU HAVE 1 DISABLED TEST
After:
...
[==========] 3 tests from 2 test cases ran. (1714 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 3 tests.
YOU HAVE 10 DISABLED TESTS
Reviewed By: siying
Differential Revision: D20680983
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 2be0fde13eeb0a71110ac7f5477cfe63996a509e
Summary:
When dynamically linking two binaries together, different builds of RocksDB from two sources might cause errors. To provide a tool for user to solve the problem, the RocksDB namespace is changed to a flag which can be overridden in build time.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6433
Test Plan: Build release, all and jtest. Try to build with ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE with another flag.
Differential Revision: D19977691
fbshipit-source-id: aa7f2d0972e1c31d75339ac48478f34f6cfcfb3e
Summary:
Since we do not evict a file's blocks from block cache before that file
is deleted, we require a file's cache ID prefix is both unique and
non-reusable. However, the Windows functionality we were relying on only
guaranteed uniqueness. That meant a newly created file could be assigned
the same cache ID prefix as a deleted file. If the newly created file
had block offsets matching the deleted file, full cache keys could be
exactly the same, resulting in obsolete data blocks returned from cache
when trying to read from the new file.
We noticed this when running on FAT32 where compaction was writing out
of order keys due to reading obsolete blocks from its input files. The
functionality is documented as behaving the same on NTFS, although I
wasn't able to repro it there.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5844
Test Plan:
we had a reliable repro of out-of-order keys on FAT32 that
was fixed by this change
Differential Revision: D17752442
fbshipit-source-id: 95d983f9196cf415f269e19293b97341edbf7e00
Summary:
The patch makes sure that two parallel test threads will operate on different db paths. This enables using open source tools such as gtest-parallel to run the tests of a file in parallel.
Example: ``` ~/gtest-parallel/gtest-parallel ./table_test```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4135
Differential Revision: D8846653
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 799bad1abb260e3d346bcb680d2ae207a852ba84
Summary:
In order to make valgrind check test to pass in a day, remove some tests that run prohibitively slow under valgrind.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3924
Differential Revision: D8210184
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: 5b06fb08f3cf57571d422d05a0dbddc9f9376f7a
Summary:
There still are many warnings (most of them about invalid printf format
for long long), but it builds if FAIL_ON_WARNINGS is disabled.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2052
Differential Revision: D4807355
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: ef03786
Summary:
The two tests keep failing in travis. Disable them and will fix later.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1648
Differential Revision: D4316389
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 0a370e7
Summary:
The persistent cache is designed to hop over errors and return key not found. So far, it has shown resilience to write errors, encoding errors, data corruption etc. It is not resilient against disappearing files/directories. This was exposed during testing when multiple instances of persistence cache was started sharing the same directory simulating an unpredictable filesystem environment.
This patch
- makes the write code path more resilient to errors while creating files
- makes the read code path more resilient to handle situation where files are not found
- added a test that does negative write/read testing by removing the directory while writes are in progress
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1472
Differential Revision: D4143413
Pulled By: kradhakrishnan
fbshipit-source-id: fd25e9b
Summary:
Exposing persistent cache stats (counters) to the user via public API.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1485
Differential Revision: D4155274
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: 30a9f50
Summary:
Currently there is no mechanism to create persistent cache from
headers. Adding a simple factory method to create a simple persistent cache with
default or NVM optimized settings.
note: Any idea to test this factory is appreciated.
Test Plan: None
Reviewers: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D64527
Summary:
Travis times out with persistent_cache_test, there is no way to increase the
timeout, so lower the test case for Travis
Test Plan: Run on travis and sandcastle
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba, andrewkr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D61863
Summary:
Travis provides a very low capability resource for testing and the
persistent cache tests are too aggressive. It causes the kernel to not have
enough time to do file-system meta data sync operation, causing open file
descriptors to increase and available space to decrease.
This change skips certain tests
Test Plan: Run on travis
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba, andrewkr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D61755
Summary:
Fixing build break on Mac
(1) uint64_t fix
(2) O_DIRECT works only for Linux
Test Plan: Build and test on Mac and Unix
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D61353
Summary:
The patch is a continuation of part 5. It glues the abstraction for
file layout and metadata, and flush out the implementation of the API. It
adds unit tests for the implementation.
Test Plan: Run unit tests
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57549
Summary:
The tsan error was because the random implementation we have is not
thread safe, using Random::GetTLSInstance
Test Plan: Run tests in Linux
Reviewers: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D59559
Summary: Disable the test under TSAN temporary to temporarily the build
Test Plan: run the test under TSAN
Reviewers: kradhakrishnan, andrewkr, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D59337
Summary:
This provides provides an implementation of PersistentCacheTier that is
specialized for RAM. This tier does not persist data though.
Why do we need this tier ?
This is ideal as tier 0. This tier can host data that is too hot.
Why can't we use Cache variants ?
Yes you can use them instead. This tier can potentially outperform BlockCache
in RAW mode by virtue of compression and compressed cache in block cache doesn't
seem very popular. Potentially this tier can be modified to under stand the
disadvantage of the tier below and retain data that the tier below is bad at
handling (for example index and bloom data that is huge in size)
Test Plan: Run unit tests added
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57069
