Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
Summary: added a new option to BackupEngine: if share_files_with_checksum is set to true, sst files are stored in shared_checksum/ and are identified by the triple (file name, checksum, file size) instead of just the file name. This option is targeted at distributed databases that want to backup their primary replica.
Test Plan: unit tests and tested backup and restore on a distributed rocksdb
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18393
Summary: Read-only BackupEngine can connect to the same backup directory that is already running BackupEngine. That enables some interesting use-cases (i.e. restoring replica from primary's backup directory)
Test Plan: added a unit test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18297
Summary:
Introducing RocksDBLite! Removes all the non-essential features and reduces the binary size. This effort should help our adoption on mobile.
Binary size when compiling for IOS (`TARGET_OS=IOS m static_lib`) is down to 9MB from 15MB (without stripping)
Test Plan: compiles :)
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, ljin, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17835
Summary: Might be useful if client doesn't want to effect running system during backup too much.
Test Plan: added a test case
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, ljin
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17091
Summary:
Added an option to BackupableDB implementation that allows users to persist in-memory databases. When the restore happens with keep_log_files = true, it will
*) Not delete existing log files in wal_dir
*) Move log files from archive directory to wal_dir, so that DB can replay them if necessary
Test Plan: Added an unit test
Reviewers: dhruba, ljin
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16941
Summary: We should dump options in backupable DB log, just like with to with RocksDB. This will aid debugging.
Test Plan: checked the log
Reviewers: ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16719
Summary:
(1) Report corruption if backup meta file has tailing data that was not read. This should fix: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/81 (also, @sdong reported similar issue)
(2) Don't use OS buffer when copying file to backup directory. We don't need the file in cache since we won't be reading it twice
(3) Don't delete newer backups when somebody tries to backup the diverged DB (restore from older backup, add new data, try to backup). Rather, just fail the new backup.
Test Plan: backupable_db_test
Reviewers: ljin, dhruba, sdong
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb, sdong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16287
Summary: Even if user flushes the memtables before getting live files, we still can't guarantee that new data didn't come in (to already-flushed memtables). If we want backups to provide consistent view of the database, we still need to get WAL files.
Test Plan: backupable_db_test
Reviewers: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16299
Summary:
The change to the public behavior:
* When opening a DB or creating new column family client gets a ColumnFamilyHandle.
* As long as column family handle is alive, client can do whatever he wants with it, even drop it
* Dropped column family can still be read from (using the column family handle)
* Added a new call CloseColumnFamily(). Client has to close all column families that he has opened before deleting the DB
* As soon as column family is closed, any calls to DB using that column family handle will fail (also any outstanding calls)
Internally:
* Ref-counting ColumnFamilyData
* New thread-safety for ColumnFamilySet
* Dropped column families are now completely dropped and their memory cleaned-up
Test Plan: added some tests to column_family_test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16101
Summary: Clean up IOErrors so that it only indicates errors talking to device.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: igor, haobo, dhruba, emayanke
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15831
Summary:
There are three SanitizeOption-s now : one for DBOptions, one for ColumnFamilyOptions and one for Options (which just calls the other two)
I have also reshuffled some options -- table_cache options and info_log should live in DBOptions, for example.
Test Plan: make check doesn't complain
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15873
Summary:
if it happens (randomly) to corrupt shared file in the test, then the
checksum will be inconsistent between meta files from different backup.
BackupEngine will then detect this issue and fail. But in reality, this
does not happen since the checksum is checked on every backup. So here,
only corrupt checksum of private file to let BackupEngine to construct
properly (but fail during restore).
Test Plan: run test with valgrind
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15531
Summary: I think it looks nicer. In RocksDB we have both styles, but I think that static method is the more common version.
Test Plan: backupable_db_test
Reviewers: ljin, benj, swk
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15519
Summary:
Lots of clients have problems with using StackableDB interface. It's nice to have BackupableDB as a layer on top of DB, but not necessary.
This diff exports BackupEngine, which can be used to create backups without forcing clients to use StackableDB interface.
Test Plan: backupable_db_test
Reviewers: dhruba, ljin, swk
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb, benj
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15477
Summary: Keep checksum of each backuped file in meta file. When it restores these files, compute their checksum on the fly and compare against what is in the meta file. Fail the restore process if checksum mismatch.
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: haobo, igor, sdong, kailiu
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15381
Summary: By removing some includes form options.h and reply on forward declaration, we can more easily reason the dependencies.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: kailiu, haobo, igor, dhruba
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15411
Summary:
This diff introduces some features that were requested by two internal customers:
* Ability for backups not to share table files, because we can't guarantee that equal filename means equal content accross replicas
* Ability for two threads to call EnableFileDeletions() and DisableFileDeletions()
* Ability to stop backup from another thread and not slow down the DB close
* Copy the files to the temporary folder first and then atomically rename
Test Plan: Added some tests to backupable_db_test
Reviewers: dhruba, sanketh, muthu, sdong, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, sanketh, muthu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14769
Summary:
We don't want two threads to clash if they concurrently call DisableFileDeletions() and EnableFileDeletions(). I'm adding a counter that will enable file deletions only after all DisableFileDeletions() calls have been negated with EnableFileDeletions().
However, we also don't want to break the old behavior, so I added a parameter force to EnableFileDeletions(). If force is true, we will still enable file deletions after every call to EnableFileDeletions(), which is what is happening now.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sanketh
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14781
Summary:
<This diff is for Column Family branch>
Sharing some of the work I've done so far. This diff compiles and passes the tests.
The biggest change is in options.h - I broke down Options into two parts - DBOptions and ColumnFamilyOptions. DBOptions is DB-specific (env, create_if_missing, block_cache, etc.) and ColumnFamilyOptions is column family-specific (all compaction options, compresion options, etc.). Note that this does not break backwards compatibility at all.
Further, I created DBWithColumnFamily which inherits DB interface and adds new functions with column family support. Clients can transparently switch to DBWithColumnFamily and it will not break their backwards compatibility.
There are few methods worth checking out: ListColumnFamilies(), MultiNewIterator(), MultiGet() and GetSnapshot(). [GetSnapshot() returns the snapshot across all column families for now - I think that's what we agreed on]
Finally, I made small changes to WriteBatch so we are able to atomically insert data across column families.
Please provide feedback.
Test Plan: make check works, the code is backward compatible
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu, emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14445
Summary:
I realized that manifest will get deleted by PurgeObsoleteFiles in DBImpl, but it is sill cleaner to delete
files before we restore the backup
Test Plan: backupable_db_test
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14619
Summary: We now delete backups with newer sequence number, so the clients don't have to handle confusing situations when they restore from backup.
Test Plan: added a unit test
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14547
