Summary:
This is an implementation of non-exclusive locks for pessimistic transactions. It is relatively simple and does not prevent starvation (ie. it's possible that request for exclusive access will never be granted if there are always threads holding shared access). It is done by changing `KeyLockInfo` to hold an set a transaction ids, instead of just one, and adding a flag specifying whether this lock is currently held with exclusive access or not.
Some implementation notes:
- Some lock diagnostic functions had to be updated to return a set of transaction ids for a given lock, eg. `GetWaitingTxn` and `GetLockStatusData`.
- Deadlock detection is a bit more complicated since a transaction can now wait on multiple other transactions. A BFS is done in this case, and deadlock detection depth is now just a limit on the number of transactions we visit.
- Expirable transactions do not work efficiently with shared locks at the moment, but that's okay for now.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1573
Differential Revision: D4239097
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: da7c074
Summary:
Currently, deadlock cycles are held in std::unordered_map. The problem with it is that it allocates/deallocates memory on every insertion/deletion. This limits throughput since we're doing this expensive operation while holding a global mutex. Fix this by using a vector which caches memory instead.
Running the deadlock stress test, this change increased throughput from 39k txns/s -> 49k txns/s. The effect is more noticeable in MyRocks.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1545
Differential Revision: D4205662
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: ff990e4
Summary: Implement deadlock detection. This is done by maintaining a TxnID -> TxnID map which represents the edges in the wait for graph (this is named `wait_txn_map_`).
Test Plan: transaction_test
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D64491
Summary:
This diff does 3 things:
Expose TransactionID so that we can identify transactions when we retrieve locking and lock wait information. This is exposed as `Transaction::GetID`.
Expose lock state information by locking all stripes in all column families and copying their contents to a data structure. This is exposed as `TransactionDB::GetLockStatusData`.
Adds support for tracking the transaction and the key being waited on, and exposes this as `Transaction::GetWaitingTxn`.
Test Plan: unit tests
Reviewers: horuff, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: vasilep, hermanlee4, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D64413
Summary:
Doing inline checking of transaction expiration instead of
using a callback.
Test Plan: To be added
Reviewers: anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D53673
Summary:
Prototype of API to allow MyRocks to override default Mutex/CondVar used by transactions with their own implementations. They would simply need to pass their own implementations of Mutex/CondVar to the templated TransactionDB::Open().
Default implementation of TransactionDBMutex/TransactionDBCondVar provided (but the code is not currently changed to use this).
Let me know if this API makes sense or if it should be changed
Test Plan: n/a
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, igor, sdong, spetrunia
Reviewed By: spetrunia
Subscribers: maykov, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43761
Summary: Provide a way to specify a detailed static error message for a Status without incurring a memcpy. Let me know what people think of this approach.
Test Plan: added simple test
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D44259
Summary:
Initial implementation of Pessimistic Transactions. This diff contains the api changes discussed in D38913. This diff is pretty large, so let me know if people would prefer to meet up to discuss it.
MyRocks folks: please take a look at the API in include/rocksdb/utilities/transaction[_db].h and let me know if you have any issues.
Also, you'll notice a couple of TODOs in the implementation of RollbackToSavePoint(). After chatting with Siying, I'm going to send out a separate diff for an alternate implementation of this feature that implements the rollback inside of WriteBatch/WriteBatchWithIndex. We can then decide which route is preferable.
Next, I'm planning on doing some perf testing and then integrating this diff into MongoRocks for further testing.
Test Plan: Unit tests, db_bench parallel testing.
Reviewers: igor, rven, sdong, yhchiang, yoshinorim
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: hermanlee4, maykov, spetrunia, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40869
