Summary:
- added a feature test in build_detect_platform to check whether sched_getcpu() is available. glibc offers it only on some platforms (e.g., linux but not mac); this way should be easier than maintaining a list of platforms on which it's available.
- refactored PhysicalCoreID() to be simpler / less repetitive. ordered the conditional compilation clauses from most-to-least preferred
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2272
Differential Revision: D5038093
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 81d7db3cc620250de220bdeb3194b2b3d7673de7
Summary:
This diff includes an implementation of CompactionFilter that allows
users to write CompactionFilter in Lua. With this ability, users can
dynamically change compaction filter logic without requiring building
the rocksdb binary and restarting the database.
To compile, WITH_LUA_PATH must be specified to the base directory
of lua.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1478
Differential Revision: D4150138
Pulled By: yhchiang
fbshipit-source-id: ed84222
Summary: Splitting the makefile part of D55581.
Test Plan:
make all check -j32
ROCKSDB_FBCODE_BUILD_WITH_481=1 make all check -j32
ROCKSDB_NO_FBCODE=1 make all check -j32
export TBB_BASE=/mnt/gvfs/third-party2/tbb/afa54b33cfcf93f1d90a3160cdb894d6d63d5dca/4.0_update2/gcc-4.9-glibc-2.20/e9936bf;
ROCKSDB_NO_FBCODE=1 CFLAGS="-I $TBB_BASE/include" LDFLAGS="-L $TBB_BASE/lib -Wl,-rpath=$TBB_BASE/lib" make all check -j32
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: kradhakrishnan, yhchiang, IslamAbdelRahman, andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D56979
Summary: current libgcc lib path is broken, update it and make sure the new one exists
Test Plan:
verify that the new path exists
make check -j64
Reviewers: yiwu, sdong, andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D59535
Summary: Warning is printed out with USE_CLANG=1 when including jemalloc.h. Disable it in that case.
Test Plan: Run db_bench with USE_CLANG=1 and not. Make sure they can all build and jemalloc status is printed out in the case where USE_CLANG is not set.
Reviewers: andrewkr, IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: leveldb, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57399
Summary: It looks like we mistakenly enable JEMALLOC even if it's not available on the machine, that's why travis is failing
Test Plan:
check on my devserver
check on my mac
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57345
Summary:
This patch update fbcode_config4.8.1.sh to get it's dependencies the same way we updated fbcode_config.sh in D53037
as a result zstd is upgraded to 0.4.7 instead of 0.4.5
Test Plan:
make clean && ROCKSDB_FBCODE_BUILD_WITH_481=1 make check -j64
make clean && ROCKSDB_FBCODE_BUILD_WITH_481=1 USE_CLANG=1 make check -j64
Reviewers: yhchiang, andrewkr, rven, kradhakrishnan, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D53355
Summary: update internal build scripts to use zstd 0.4.5.
Test Plan: built and ran tests with and without ROCKSDB_FBCODE_BUILD_WITH_481
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, kradhakrishnan, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D52833
Summary: After removing two move operations, we can make CLANG 3.7 build pass under GCC 4.8.1.
Test Plan: USE_CLANG=1 ROCKSDB_FBCODE_BUILD_WITH_481=1 make all -j32
Reviewers: yhchiang, IslamAbdelRahman, rven, anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D52365
Summary: fb build for gcc 4.8.1 is broken for the ZSTD dependency is not fixed after ea11923550. Fixing it.
Test Plan: ROCKSDB_FBCODE_BUILD_WITH_481=1 make -j40 OPT=-g
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D51741
Summary: Upgrade version of some dependencies in build_tools/fbcode_config4.8.1.sh. I didn't upgrade version for CLANG because some warnings are shown.
Test Plan:
build:
ROCKSDB_FBCODE_BUILD_WITH_481=1 USE_CLANG=1 make all -j32
as well as
ROCKSDB_FBCODE_BUILD_WITH_481=1 make all -j32
Reviewers: anthony, IslamAbdelRahman, kradhakrishnan, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: igor, kradhakrishnan, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D51003
Summary: This patch splits the posix storage backend into Env and
the actual *File implementations. The motivation is to allow other Envs
to use posix as a library. This enables a storage backend different from
posix to split its secondary storage between a normal file system
partition managed by posix, and it own media.
Test Plan: No new functionality is added to posix Env or the library,
thus the current tests should suffice.
Summary: Add ZSTD compression type. The same way as adding LZ4.
Test Plan: run all tests. Generate files in db_bench. Make sure reads succeed. But the SST files cannot be opened in older versions. Also some other adhoc tests.
Reviewers: rven, anthony, IslamAbdelRahman, kradhakrishnan, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, maykov, yoshinorim, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D45747
Summary:
MyRocks is using jemalloc latest version, not 3.6.0.
Combining multiple versions (3.6.0 in RocksDB and latest in MyRocks)
broke some features -- for example, getting SIGSEGV when heap profiling
was enabled.
This diff switches to use jemalloc latest, if
env variable ROCKSDB_FBCODE_BUILD_WITH_481=1 was set.
My understanding is this env was used by MyRocks only so it would be
safe to change.
Test Plan: building MyRocks then verified jemalloc heap profiling worked
Reviewers: igor, rven, yhchiang, jtolmer, maykov, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43479
Summary: Copy change from D37533 to gcc 4.8.1 config
Test Plan: make db_bench, `ldd db_bench`, try running it
Reviewers: MarkCallaghan, anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40845
Summary:
Currently, when we insert something into block cache, we say that the block cache capacity decreased by the size of the block. However, size of the block might be less than the actual memory used by this object. For example, 4.5KB block will actually use 8KB of memory. So even if we configure block cache to 10GB, our actually memory usage of block cache will be 20GB!
This problem showed up a lot in testing and just recently also showed up in MongoRocks production where we were using 30GB more memory than expected.
This diff will fix the problem. Instead of counting the block size, we will count memory used by the block. That way, a block cache configured to be 10GB will actually use only 10GB of memory.
I'm using non-portable function and I couldn't find info on portability on Google. However, it seems to work on Linux, which will cover majority of our use-cases.
Test Plan:
1. fill up mongo instance with 80GB of data
2. restart mongo with block cache size configured to 10GB
3. do a table scan in mongo
4. memory usage before the diff: 12GB. memory usage after the diff: 10.5GB
Reviewers: sdong, MarkCallaghan, rven, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40635
Summary: I don't think we need to use whole-archive to include jemalloc. This change only affects our development builds -- it does not affect our open source builds (which don't support jemalloc) or our fbcode third-party2 builds (which use open-source build codepaths).
Test Plan:
make
verify that jemalloc is running by running `MALLOC_CONF="prof:true" ./cache_test` and observing that file was created
Reviewers: MarkCallaghan
Reviewed By: MarkCallaghan
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D36783
Summary: We need this because we build MySQL with 4.8.1.
Test Plan: ROCKSDB_FBCODE_BUILD_WITH_481=1 make check
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, rven, yoshinorim
Reviewed By: yoshinorim
Subscribers: jonahcohen, yoshinorim, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D32073
