Summary:
MyRocks is using jemalloc latest version, not 3.6.0.
Combining multiple versions (3.6.0 in RocksDB and latest in MyRocks)
broke some features -- for example, getting SIGSEGV when heap profiling
was enabled.
This diff switches to use jemalloc latest, if
env variable ROCKSDB_FBCODE_BUILD_WITH_481=1 was set.
My understanding is this env was used by MyRocks only so it would be
safe to change.
Test Plan: building MyRocks then verified jemalloc heap profiling worked
Reviewers: igor, rven, yhchiang, jtolmer, maykov, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43479
Summary: Copy change from D37533 to gcc 4.8.1 config
Test Plan: make db_bench, `ldd db_bench`, try running it
Reviewers: MarkCallaghan, anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40845
Summary:
Currently, when we insert something into block cache, we say that the block cache capacity decreased by the size of the block. However, size of the block might be less than the actual memory used by this object. For example, 4.5KB block will actually use 8KB of memory. So even if we configure block cache to 10GB, our actually memory usage of block cache will be 20GB!
This problem showed up a lot in testing and just recently also showed up in MongoRocks production where we were using 30GB more memory than expected.
This diff will fix the problem. Instead of counting the block size, we will count memory used by the block. That way, a block cache configured to be 10GB will actually use only 10GB of memory.
I'm using non-portable function and I couldn't find info on portability on Google. However, it seems to work on Linux, which will cover majority of our use-cases.
Test Plan:
1. fill up mongo instance with 80GB of data
2. restart mongo with block cache size configured to 10GB
3. do a table scan in mongo
4. memory usage before the diff: 12GB. memory usage after the diff: 10.5GB
Reviewers: sdong, MarkCallaghan, rven, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40635
Summary: I don't think we need to use whole-archive to include jemalloc. This change only affects our development builds -- it does not affect our open source builds (which don't support jemalloc) or our fbcode third-party2 builds (which use open-source build codepaths).
Test Plan:
make
verify that jemalloc is running by running `MALLOC_CONF="prof:true" ./cache_test` and observing that file was created
Reviewers: MarkCallaghan
Reviewed By: MarkCallaghan
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D36783
Summary: We need this because we build MySQL with 4.8.1.
Test Plan: ROCKSDB_FBCODE_BUILD_WITH_481=1 make check
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, rven, yoshinorim
Reviewed By: yoshinorim
Subscribers: jonahcohen, yoshinorim, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D32073
