Summary:
Memtable will now be forced to flush if the one of the following
conditions is met:
1. Already allocated more than write_buffer_size + 60% arena block size.
(the overflowing condition)
2. Unable to safely allocate one more arena block without hitting the
overflowing condition AND the unused allocated memory < 25% arena
block size.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: sdong, haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16893
Summary:
This is is based on https://reviews.facebook.net/D15027. It's not finished but I would like to give a prototype to avoid arena over-allocation while making better use of the already allocated memory blocks.
Instead of check approximate memtable size, we will take a deeper look at the arena, which incorporate essential idea that @sdong suggests: flush when arena has allocated its last and the last is "almost full"
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: haobo, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb, sdong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15051
Summary:
I'm cleaning up some code preparing for the big diff review tomorrow. This is the first part of the cleanup.
Changes are mostly cosmetic. The goal is to decrease amount of code difference between columnfamilies and master branch.
This diff also fixes race condition when dropping column family.
Test Plan: Ran db_stress with variety of parameters
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16833
Summary:
(1) Fix SanitizeOptions() to also check HashLinkList. The current
dynamic case just happens to work because the 2 classes have the same
layout.
(2) Do not delete SliceTransform object in HashSkipListFactory and
HashLinkListFactory destructor. Reason: SanitizeOptions() enforces
prefix_extractor and SliceTransform to be the same object when
Hash**Factory is used. This makes the behavior strange: when
Hash**Factory is used, prefix_extractor will be released by RocksDB. If
other memtable factory is used, prefix_extractor should be released by
user.
Test Plan: db_bench && make asan_check
Reviewers: haobo, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16587
Summary:
this is the key component extracted from diff: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14271
I separate it to a dedicated patch to make the review easier.
Test Plan: added a unit test and passed it.
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16245
Summary: DBImpl now keeps a list of alive_log_files_. On every FindObsoleteFiles, it deletes all alive log files that are smaller than versions_->MinLogNumber()
Test Plan:
make check passes
no specific unit tests yet, will add
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16293
Summary:
This patch optimized Get() code paths by avoiding malloc of iterators. Iterator creation is moved to mem table rep implementations, where a callback is called when any key is found. This is the same practice as what we do in (SST) table readers.
db_bench result for readrandom following a writeseq, with no compression, single thread and tmpfs, we see throughput improved to 144958 from 139027, about 3%.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, yhchiang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14685
Summary: RocksDB doesn't compile on 32-bit architecture apparently. This is attempt to fix some of 32-bit errors. They are reported here: https://gist.github.com/paxos/8789697
Test Plan: RocksDB still compiles on 64-bit :)
Reviewers: kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15825
Summary:
Easy thing goes first. This patch moves arena to internal dir; based
on which, the coming patch will deal with memtable_rep.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15615
Summary: All memtables and immutable memtables are moved from DBImpl to ColumnFamilyData. For now, they are all referenced from default column family in DBImpl. It shouldn't be hard to get them from custom column family.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, kailiu, sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15459
Summary: Converting from length prefixed buffer back to internal key costs some CPU but it is not necessary. In this patch, internal keys are pass though the functions so that we don't need to convert back to it.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: igor, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15393
Summary: Commit "1304d8c8cefe66be1a3caa5e93413211ba2486f2" (Merge branch 'master' into performance) removes a line in performance branch by mistake. This patch fixes it.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15297
Summary: I'm separating code-cleanup part of https://reviews.facebook.net/D14517. This will make D14517 easier to understand and this diff easier to review.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, sdong, dhruba, tnovak
Reviewed By: tnovak
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15099
Summary:
This diff fixes 2 hacks:
* The callback function can modify the existing value inplace, if the merged value fits within the existing buffer size. But currently the existing buffer size is not being modified. Now the callback recieves a int* allowing the size to be modified. Since size is encoded as a varint in the internal key for memtable. It might happen that the entire value might have be copied to the new location if the new size varint is smaller than the existing size varint.
* The callback function has 3 functionalities
1. Modify existing buffer inplace, and update size correspondingly. Now to indicate that, Returns 1.
2. Generate a new buffer indicating merged value. Returns 2.
3. Fails to do either of above, based on whatever application logic. Returns 0.
Test Plan: Just make all for now. I'm adding another unit test to test each scenario.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, sdong, kailiu, xinyaohu, sumeet, danguo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15195
Summary:
shared_ptr is slower than unique_ptr (which literally comes with no performance cost compare with raw pointers).
In memtable and memtable rep, we use shared_ptr when we'd actually should use unique_ptr.
According to igor's previous work, we are likely to make quite some performance gain from this diff.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, igor, sdong, haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15213
Summary:
I will submit a sequence of diffs that are preparing master branch for column families. There are a lot of implicit assumptions in the code that are making column family implementation hard. If I make the change only in column family branch, it will make merging back to master impossible.
Most of the diffs will be simple code refactorings, so I hope we can have fast turnaround time. Feel free to grab me in person to discuss any of them.
This diff removes number of level check from VersionEdit. It is used only when VersionEdit is read, not written, but has to be set when it is written. I believe it is a right thing to make VersionEdit dumb and check consistency on the caller side. This will also make it much easier to implement Column Families, since different column families can have different number of levels.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15159
Summary: The application can set a callback function, which is applied on the previous value. And calculates the new value. This new value can be set, either inplace, if the previous value existed in memtable, and new value is smaller than previous value. Otherwise the new value is added normally.
Test Plan: fbmake. Added unit tests. All unit tests pass.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: sdong, kailiu, xinyaohu, sumeet, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14745
Summary:
Added an option (max_successive_merges) that can be used to specify the
maximum number of successive merge operations on a key in the memtable.
This can be used to improve performance of the "get" operation. If many
successive merge operations are performed on a key, the performance of "get"
operations on the key deteriorates, as the value has to be computed for each
"get" operation by applying all the successive merge operations.
FB Task ID: #3428853
Test Plan:
make all check
db_bench --benchmarks=readrandommergerandom
counter_stress_test
Reviewers: haobo, vamsi, dhruba, sdong
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: zshao
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14991
Summary:
I have added three new value types:
* kTypeColumnFamilyDeletion
* kTypeColumnFamilyValue
* kTypeColumnFamilyMerge
which include column family Varint32 before the data (value, deletion and merge). These values are used only in WAL (not in memtables yet).
This endeavour required changing some WriteBatch internals.
Test Plan: Added a unittest
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15045
Summary:
In some places we have NotFound status created with empty message, but it doesn't avoid a malloc. With this patch, the malloc is avoided for that case.
The motivation of it is that I found in db_bench readrandom test when all keys are not existing, about 4% of the total running time is spent on malloc of Status, plus a similar amount of CPU spent on free of them, which is not necessary.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14691
Summary: In get operations, merge_operands is only used in few cases. Lazily initialize it can reduce average latency in some cases
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: igor, nkg-, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14415
Conflicts:
db/db_impl.cc
db/memtable.cc
Summary: as title
Test Plan: dynamic_bloom_test
Reviewers: dhruba, sdong, kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14385
Summary: In get operations, merge_operands is only used in few cases. Lazily initialize it can reduce average latency in some cases
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: igor, nkg-, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14415
Summary:
I went through all remaining shared_ptrs and removed the ones that I found not-necessary. Only GenerateCachePrefix() is called fairly often, so don't expect much perf wins.
The ones that are left are accessed infrequently and I think we're fine with keeping them.
Test Plan: make asan_check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14427
Summary: liveness of the statistics object is already ensured by the shared pointer in DB options. There's no reason to pass again shared pointer among internal functions. Raw pointer is sufficient and efficient.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, MarkCallaghan, igor
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, reconnect.grayhat
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14289
Summary:
Provide a framework to profile a query in detail to figure out latency bottleneck. Currently, in Get(), Put() and iterators, 2-3 simple timing is used. We can easily add more profile counters to the framework later.
Test Plan: Enable this profiling in seveal existing tests.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu, emayanke, vamsi, igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14001
Conflicts:
table/merger.cc
Summary:
Provide a framework to profile a query in detail to figure out latency bottleneck. Currently, in Get(), Put() and iterators, 2-3 simple timing is used. We can easily add more profile counters to the framework later.
Test Plan: Enable this profiling in seveal existing tests.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu, emayanke, vamsi, igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14001
Summary:
For prefix mem tables, encoding mem table key may be unnecessary if the prefix doesn't have any key. This patch is a little bit hacky but I want to try out the performance gain of removing this lazy initialization.
In longer term, we might want to revisit the way we abstract mem tables implementations.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, igor, kailiu
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14265
Summary: Added a prefix_seek flag in ReadOptions to indicate that Seek is prefix aware(might not return data with different prefix), and also not bound to a specific prefix. Multiple Seeks and range scans can be invoked on the same iterator. If a specific prefix is specified, this flag will be ignored. Just a quick prototype that works for PrefixHashRep, the new lockless memtable could be easily extended with this support too.
Test Plan: test it on Leaf
Reviewers: dhruba, kailiu, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13929
Summary:
Currently for each put, a fresh memory is allocated, and a new entry is added to the memtable with a new sequence number irrespective of whether the key already exists in the memtable. This diff is an attempt to update the value inplace for existing keys. It currently handles a very simple case:
1. Key already exists in the current memtable. Does not inplace update values in immutable memtable or snapshot
2. Latest value type is a 'put' ie kTypeValue
3. New value size is less than existing value, to avoid reallocating memory
TODO: For a put of an existing key, deallocate memory take by values, for other value types till a kTypeValue is found, ie. remove kTypeMerge.
TODO: Update the transaction log, to allow consistent reload of the memtable.
Test Plan: Added a unit test verifying the inplace update. But some other unit tests broken due to invalid sequence number checks. WIll fix them next.
Reviewers: xinyaohu, sumeet, haobo, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12423
Automatic commit by arc
