Summary:
RocksDB does auto-readahead for iterators on noticing more than two sequential reads for a table file if user doesn't provide readahead_size. The readahead starts at 8KB and doubles on every additional read up to max_auto_readahead_size. However at each level, if iterator moves over next file, readahead_size starts again from 8KB.
This PR introduces a new ReadOption "adaptive_readahead" which when set true will maintain readahead_size at each level. So when iterator moves from one file to another, new file's readahead_size will continue from previous file's readahead_size instead of scratch. However if reads are not sequential it will fall back to 8KB (default) with no prefetching for that block.
1. If block is found in cache but it was eligible for prefetch (block wasn't in Rocksdb's prefetch buffer), readahead_size will decrease by 8KB.
2. It maintains readahead_size for L1 - Ln levels.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9056
Test Plan:
Added new unit tests
Ran db_bench for "readseq, seekrandom, seekrandomwhilewriting, readrandom" with --adaptive_readahead=true and there was no regression if new feature is enabled.
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D31773640
Pulled By: akankshamahajan15
fbshipit-source-id: 7332d16258b846ae5cea773009195a5af58f8f98
Summary:
BlockPrefetcher is used by iterators to prefetch data if they
anticipate more data to be used in future and this is valid for forward sequential
scans. But BlockPrefetcher tracks only num_file_reads_ and not if reads
are sequential. This presents problem for MultiGet with large number of
keys when it reseeks index iterator and data block. FilePrefetchBuffer
can end up doing large readahead for reseeks as readahead size
increases exponentially once readahead is enabled. Same issue is with
BlockBasedTableIterator.
Add previous length and offset read as well in BlockPrefetcher (creates
FilePrefetchBuffer) and FilePrefetchBuffer (does prefetching of data) to
determine if reads are sequential and then prefetch.
Update the last block read after cache hit to take reads from cache also
in account.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7394
Test Plan: Add new unit test case
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D23737617
Pulled By: akankshamahajan15
fbshipit-source-id: 8e6917c25ed87b285ee495d1b68dc623d71205a3
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
