Summary:
- New Uint64 comparator
- Modify Reader and Builder to take custom user comparators instead of bytewise comparator
- Modify logic for choosing unused user key in builder
- Modify iterator logic in reader
- test changes
Test Plan:
cuckoo_table_{builder,reader,db}_test
make check all
Reviewers: ljin, sdong
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22377
Summary:
I will move compression related options in a separate diff since this
diff is already pretty lengthy.
I guess I will also need to change JNI accordingly :(
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21915
Summary:
Adding num_column_families flag. Adding support for column families in DoWrite and ReadRandom methods.
[Igor, please let me know if this approach sounds good. I shall add it to other methods too.]
Test Plan: Ran fillseq on 1M keys and 10 Column families and ran readrandom.
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21387
Summary: Adding flags to use cuckoo table SST in db_bench.cc
Test Plan: Ran benchmark with fillseq and readrandom
Reviewers: sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21729
Summary: This is a linux-specific system call.
Test Plan: ran db_bench
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: haobo, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21183
Summary:
Add block_restart_interval in db_bench, default value 16
Test Plan:
make
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20331
Summary:
Since we have a lot of options for PlainTable, add a struct PlainTableOptions
to manage them
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20175
Summary:
add a flag called use_hash_search in db_bench
Test Plan:
make all check
./db_bench --use_hash_search=1
Reviewers: ljin, haobo, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: igor, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20067
Summary:
Changes:
- Adding numa_aware flag to db_bench.cc
- Using numa.h library to bind memory and cpu of threads to a fixed NUMA node
Result: There seems to be no significant change in the micros/op time with numa_aware enabled. I also tried this with other implementations, including a combination of pthread_setaffinity_np, sched_setaffinity and set_mempolicy methods. It'd be great if someone could point out where I'm going wrong and if we can achieve a better micors/op.
Test Plan:
Ran db_bench tests using following command:
./db_bench --db=/mnt/tmp --num_levels=6 --key_size=20 --prefix_size=20 --keys_per_prefix=0 --value_size=100 --block_size=4096 --cache_size=17179869184 --cache_numshardbits=6 --compression_type=none --compression_ratio=1 --min_level_to_compress=-1 --disable_seek_compaction=1 --hard_rate_limit=2 --write_buffer_size=134217728 --max_write_buffer_number=2 --level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=8 --target_file_size_base=134217728 --max_bytes_for_level_base=1073741824 --disable_wal=0 --wal_dir=/mnt/tmp --sync=0 --disable_data_sync=1 --verify_checksum=1 --delete_obsolete_files_period_micros=314572800 --max_grandparent_overlap_factor=10 --max_background_compactions=4 --max_background_flushes=0 --level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=16 --level0_stop_writes_trigger=24 --statistics=0 --stats_per_interval=0 --stats_interval=1048576 --histogram=0 --use_plain_table=1 --open_files=-1 --mmap_read=1 --mmap_write=0 --memtablerep=prefix_hash --bloom_bits=10 --bloom_locality=1 --perf_level=0 --duration=300 --benchmarks=readwhilewriting --use_existing_db=1 --num=157286400 --threads=24 --writes_per_second=10240 --numa_aware=[False/True]
The tests were run in private devserver with 24 cores and the db was prepopulated using filluniquerandom test. The tests resulted in 0.145 us/op with numa_aware=False and 0.161 us/op with numa_aware=True.
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, ljin, igor
Reviewed By: ljin, igor
Subscribers: igor, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19353
Summary:
RandomGenerator::Generate() currently has an assertion len < data_.size().
However, it is actually fine to have len == data_.size().
This diff change the assertion to len <= data_.size().
Test Plan:
make db_bench
./db_bench
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19269
Summary: as title
Test Plan: make release
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19227
Summary: as requested by mark
Test Plan: make release
Reviewers: sdong, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19221
Summary:
As discussed in our internal group, we don't get much use of seek compaction at the moment, while it's making code more complicated and slower in some cases.
This diff removes seek compaction and (hopefully) all code that was introduced to support seek compaction.
There is one test case that relied on didIO information. I'll try to find another way to implement it.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: sdong, haobo, yhchiang, ljin, dhruba
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19161
Summary:
Forward iterator puts everything together in a flat structure instead of
a hierarchy of nested iterators. this should simplify the code and
provide better performance. It also enables more optimization since all
information are accessiable in one place.
Init evaluation shows about 6% improvement
Test Plan: db_test and db_bench
Reviewers: dhruba, igor, tnovak, sdong, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
Subscribers: sdong, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18795
Summary: One more option to allow iterator refreshing when using normal iterator
Test Plan: ran db_bench
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18849
Summary: Key size limit doesn't seem to be applicable anymore. Remove it.
Test Plan: run a couple of tests in db_bench
Reviewers: haobo, igor, yhchiang, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18723
Summary:
Newer gflags switched from `google` namespace to `gflags` namespace. See: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/139 and https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/102
Unfortunately, they don't define any macro with their namespace, so we need to actually try to compile gflags with two different namespace to figure out which one is the correct one.
Test Plan: works in fbcode environemnt. I'll also try in ubutnu with newer gflags
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18537
Summary:
= Major Changes =
* Add a new mem-table representation, HashCuckooRep, which is based cuckoo hash.
Cuckoo hash uses multiple hash functions. This allows each key to have multiple
possible locations in the mem-table.
- Put: When insert a key, it will try to find whether one of its possible
locations is vacant and store the key. If none of its possible
locations are available, then it will kick out a victim key and
store at that location. The kicked-out victim key will then be
stored at a vacant space of its possible locations or kick-out
another victim. In this diff, the kick-out path (known as
cuckoo-path) is found using BFS, which guarantees to be the shortest.
- Get: Simply tries all possible locations of a key --- this guarantees
worst-case constant time complexity.
- Time complexity: O(1) for Get, and average O(1) for Put if the
fullness of the mem-table is below 80%.
- Default using two hash functions, the number of hash functions used
by the cuckoo-hash may dynamically increase if it fails to find a
short-enough kick-out path.
- Currently, HashCuckooRep does not support iteration and snapshots,
as our current main purpose of this is to optimize point access.
= Minor Changes =
* Add IsSnapshotSupported() to DB to indicate whether the current DB
supports snapshots. If it returns false, then DB::GetSnapshot() will
always return nullptr.
Test Plan:
Run existing tests. Will develop a test specifically for cuckoo hash in
the next diff.
Reviewers: sdong, haobo
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb, dhruba, igor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16155
Summary:
also add an override option total_order_iteration if you want to use full
iterator with prefix_extractor
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: igor, haobo, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17805
Summary: While debugging Mac-only issue with ThreadLocalPtr, this was very useful. Let's print out stack trace in MAC OS, too.
Test Plan: Verified that somewhat useful stack trace was generated on mac. Will run PrintStack() on linux, too.
Reviewers: ljin, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18189
Summary: Added benchmark functionality on the lines of folly/Benchmark.h
Test Plan: Added unit tests
Reviewers: igor, haobo, sdong, ljin, yhchiang, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17973
Summary: multireadrandom is broken. Fix it
Test Plan: run it and see segfault has gone.
Reviewers: ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17781
Summary: This patch introduces a new parameter num_multi_db in db_bench. When this parameter is larger than 1, multiple DBs will be created. In all benchmarks, any operation applies to a random DB among them. This is to benchmark the performance of similar applications.
Test Plan: run db_bench on both of num_multi_db=0 and more.
Reviewers: haobo, ljin, igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: igor, yhchiang, dhruba, nkg-, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17769
Summary: as title
Test Plan: ran it
Reviewers: igor, haobo, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17751
Summary: as title
Test Plan: ran it
Reviewers: igor, haobo, yhchiang
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17655
Summary: Compiling for iOS has by default turned on -Wmissing-prototypes, which causes rocksdb to fail compiling. This diff turns on -Wmissing-prototypes in our compile options and cleans up all functions with missing prototypes.
Test Plan: compiles
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, ljin, sdong
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17649
Summary:
filluniquerandom is painfully slow due to the naive bitmap check to find
out if a key has been seen before. Majority of time is spent on searching
the last few keys. Split a giant BitSet to smaller ones so that we can
quickly check if a BitSet is full and thus can skip quickly.
It used to take over one hour to filluniquerandom for 100M keys, now it
takes about 10 mins.
Test Plan:
unit test
also verified correctness in db_bench and make sure all keys are
generated
Reviewers: igor, haobo, yhchiang
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17607
Summary:
clean up the db_bench a little bit. also avoid allocating memory for key
in the loop
Test Plan:
I verified a run with filluniquerandom & readrandom. Iterator seek will be used lot
to measure performance. Will fix whatever comes up
Reviewers: haobo, igor, yhchiang
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17559
Summary: per sdong's request, this will help processor prefetch on n->key case.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: sdong, haobo, igor
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17415
Summary:
By constraining the probes within cache line(s), we can improve the
cache miss rate thus performance. This probably only makes sense for
in-memory workload so defaults the option to off.
Numbers and comparision can be found in wiki:
https://our.intern.facebook.com/intern/wiki/index.php/Ljin/rocksdb_perf/2014_03_17#Bloom_Filter_Study
Test Plan: benchmarked this change substantially. Will run make all check as well
Reviewers: haobo, igor, dhruba, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17133
Summary:
(1) Fix SanitizeOptions() to also check HashLinkList. The current
dynamic case just happens to work because the 2 classes have the same
layout.
(2) Do not delete SliceTransform object in HashSkipListFactory and
HashLinkListFactory destructor. Reason: SanitizeOptions() enforces
prefix_extractor and SliceTransform to be the same object when
Hash**Factory is used. This makes the behavior strange: when
Hash**Factory is used, prefix_extractor will be released by RocksDB. If
other memtable factory is used, prefix_extractor should be released by
user.
Test Plan: db_bench && make asan_check
Reviewers: haobo, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16587
Summary:
Add helper function to print perf context data in db_bench if enabled.
I didn't find any code that actually exports perf context data. Not sure
if I missed anything
Test Plan: ran db_bench
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16575
Summary:
For HashSkipList case, DBImpl has sanity check to see if prefix_extractor in
options is the same as the one in memtable factory. If not, it falls
back to SkipList. As result, I was experimenting with SkipList
performance. No wonder it is much worse than LinkedList
Test Plan: ran benchmark
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16569
Summary: as title
Test Plan: make release
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16437
Summary:
The issue is that when FLAGS_num is small, the leading bytes of the key
are padded with 0s. This makes all keys have the same prefix 00000000
Most of the changes are just to make lint happy
Test Plan: ran db_bench
Reviewers: sdong, haobo, igor
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16317
Summary: as title
Test Plan: ran db_bench
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16269
Summary: as title
Test Plan: ran db_bench to gather stats
Reviewers: haobo, sdong
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16059
Summary:
Added an option for readrandom benchmark to run with tailing iterator instead of Get. Benefit of tailing iterator is that it doesn't require locking DB mutex on access.
I also have some results when running on my machine. The results highly depend on number of cache shards. With our current benchmark setting of 4 table cache shards and 6 block cache shards, I don't see much improvements of using tailing iterator. In that case, we're probably seeing cache mutex contention.
Here are the results for different number of shards
cache shards tailing iterator get
6 1.38M 1.16M
10 1.58M 1.15M
As soon as we get rid of cache mutex contention, we're seeing big improvements in using tailing iterator vs. ordinary get.
Test Plan: ran regression test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, ljin, kailiu, sding
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: tnovak
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15867
Summary:
Use super_version insider NewIterator to avoid Ref() each component
separately under mutex
The new added bench shows NewIterator QPS increases from 515K to 719K
No meaningful improvement for multiget I guess due to its relatively small
cost comparing to 90 keys fetch in the test.
Test Plan: unit test and db_bench
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15609
Summary: By removing some includes form options.h and reply on forward declaration, we can more easily reason the dependencies.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: kailiu, haobo, igor, dhruba
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15411
