Summary: DBIter now uses a std::string for saved_key. Based on some profiling, it could be more expensive than we though. Optimize it with the same technique as LookupKey -- if it is short, we copy it to a static allocated char. Otherwise, dynamically allocate memory for it.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, ljin
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: dhruba, igor, yhchiang, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17289
Summary: Fix some more CompactionFilterV2 valgrind issues. Maybe it would make sense for CompactionFilterV2 to delete its prefix_extractor?
Test Plan: ran CompactionFilterV2* tests with valgrind. issues before patch -> no issues after
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, ljin, dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, danguo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17337
Summary: Since we are optimizing for server workloads, some default values are not optimized any more. We change some of those values that I feel it's less prone to regression bugs.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, ljin, igor, yhchiang
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, MarkCallaghan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16995
Summary:
This is the part that was not finished when doing the Options.max_num_files=-1 feature. For iterating non level0 SST files (which was done using two level iterator), table cache is not bypassed. With this patch, the leftover feature is done.
Test Plan: make all check; change Options.max_num_files=-1 in one of the tests to cover the codes.
Reviewers: haobo, igor, dhruba, ljin, yhchiang
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17001
Summary:
Currently if client uses kNULLString as the prefix, it will confuse
compaction filter v2. This diff added a bool to indicate if the prefix
has been intialized. I also added a unit test to cover this case and
make sure the new code path is hit.
Test Plan: db_test
Reviewers: igor, haobo
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17151
Summary:
This diff adds a new CompactionFilterV2 API that roll up the
decisions of kv pairs during compactions. These kv pairs must share the
same key prefix. They are buffered inside the db.
typedef std::vector<Slice> SliceVector;
virtual std::vector<bool> Filter(int level,
const SliceVector& keys,
const SliceVector& existing_values,
std::vector<std::string>* new_values,
std::vector<bool>* values_changed
) const = 0;
Application can override the Filter() function to operate
on the buffered kv pairs. More details in the inline documentation.
Test Plan:
make check. Added unit tests to make sure Keep, Delete,
Change all works.
Reviewers: haobo
CCs: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15087
Summary: D17067 breaks DBTest.UniversalCompactionTrigger because of wrong location of the checking. Fix it.
Test Plan: Run the test and make sure it passes.
Reviewers: igor, haobo
Reviewed By: igor
CC: dhruba, ljin, yhchiang, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17079
Summary: Add unit tests to make sure CompactionFilterContext::is_manual_compaction_ and CompactionFilterContext::is_full_compaction_ are set correctly.
Test Plan: run the new tests.
Reviewers: haobo, igor, dhruba, yhchiang, ljin
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: nkg-, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17067
Summary: Add a property to calculate number of background errors encountered to help users build their monitoring
Test Plan: Add a unit test. make all check
Reviewers: haobo, igor, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: ljin, nkg-, yhchiang, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16959
Summary: To partly address the request @nkg- raised, add three easy-to-add properties to compactions and flushes.
Test Plan: run unit tests and add a new unit test to cover new properties.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: nkg-, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13677
Summary: Prev() now can hang when there is a key with more than max_skipped number of appearance internally but all of them are newer than the sequence ID to seek. Add unit tests to confirm the bug and fix it.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: igor, haobo
Reviewed By: igor
CC: ljin, yhchiang, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16899
Summary:
This is is based on https://reviews.facebook.net/D15027. It's not finished but I would like to give a prototype to avoid arena over-allocation while making better use of the already allocated memory blocks.
Instead of check approximate memtable size, we will take a deeper look at the arena, which incorporate essential idea that @sdong suggests: flush when arena has allocated its last and the last is "almost full"
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: haobo, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb, sdong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15051
Summary: A bad Auto-Merge caused log buffer is flushed twice. Remove the unintended one.
Test Plan: Should already be tested (the code looks the same as when I ran unit tests).
Reviewers: haobo, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: ljin, yhchiang, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16821
Summary:
(1) Fix SanitizeOptions() to also check HashLinkList. The current
dynamic case just happens to work because the 2 classes have the same
layout.
(2) Do not delete SliceTransform object in HashSkipListFactory and
HashLinkListFactory destructor. Reason: SanitizeOptions() enforces
prefix_extractor and SliceTransform to be the same object when
Hash**Factory is used. This makes the behavior strange: when
Hash**Factory is used, prefix_extractor will be released by RocksDB. If
other memtable factory is used, prefix_extractor should be released by
user.
Test Plan: db_bench && make asan_check
Reviewers: haobo, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16587
Summary: I wrote a test that triggers assertion in MergingIterator. I have not touched that code ever, so I'm looking for somebody with good understanding of the MergingIterator code to fix this. The solution is probably a one-liner. Let me know if you're willing to take a look.
Test Plan: This test fails with an assertion `use_heap_ == false`
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16521
Summary:
Add an optional input parameter ReadOptions to DB::GetUpdateSince(),
which allows the verification of checksums to be disabled by setting
ReadOptions::verify_checksums to false.
Test Plan: Tests are done off-line and will not be included in the regular unit test.
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, xjin, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16305
Summary: Provide a public API for users to access the table properties for each SSTable.
Test Plan: Added a unit tests to test the function correctness under differnet conditions.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, sdong
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16083
Summary: Added a bit more information to compaction context, requested by internal team at FB.
Test Plan: Modified CompactionFilter test to make sure is_manual_compaction is properly set.
Reviewers: haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16095
Summary: This covers existing table files before DB open happens and avoids contention on table cache
Test Plan: db_test
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, igor, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16089
Summary:
Use super_version insider NewIterator to avoid Ref() each component
separately under mutex
The new added bench shows NewIterator QPS increases from 515K to 719K
No meaningful improvement for multiget I guess due to its relatively small
cost comparing to 90 keys fetch in the test.
Test Plan: unit test and db_bench
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15609
Summary: In PlainTable, use one single byte to represent 8 bytes of internal bytes, if seqID = 0 and it is value type (which should be common for bottom most files). It is to save 7 bytes for uncompressed cases.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: igor, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15489
Summary: By removing some includes form options.h and reply on forward declaration, we can more easily reason the dependencies.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: kailiu, haobo, igor, dhruba
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15411
Summary:
Mixing index/filter blocks with data blocks resulted in some known
issues. To make sure in next release our users won't be affected,
we added a new option in BlockBasedTableFactory::TableOption to
conceal this functionality for now.
This patch also introduced a BlockBasedTableReader::OpenOptions,
which avoids the "infinite" growth of parameters in
BlockBasedTableReader::Open().
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, igor, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, tnovak
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15327
Summary: as title
Test Plan:
make all check
What else tests shall I cover?
Reviewers: igor, haobo
CC:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15339
Summary:
This diff implements a special type of iterator that doesn't create a snapshot
(can be used to read newly inserted data) and is optimized for doing sequential
reads.
TailingIterator uses current superversion number to determine whether to
invalidate its internal iterators. If the version hasn't changed, it can often
avoid doing expensive seeks over immutable structures (sst files and immutable
memtables).
Test Plan:
* new unit tests
* running LD with this patch
Reviewers: igor, dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb, lovro, march
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15285
Summary:
This diff does two things:
* Rethinks how we call Recover() with read_only option. Before, we call it with pointer to memtable where we'd like to apply those changes to. This memtable is set in db_impl_readonly.cc and it's actually DBImpl::mem_. Why don't we just apply updates to mem_ right away? It seems more intuitive.
* Changes when we apply updates to manifest. Before, the process is to recover all the logs, flush it to sst files and then do one giant commit that atomically adds all recovered sst files and sets the next log number. This works good enough, but causes some small troubles for my column family approach, since I can't have one VersionEdit apply to more than single column family[1]. The change here is to commit the files recovered from logs right away. Here is the state of the world before the change:
1. Recover log 5, add new sst files to edit
2. Recover log 7, add new sst files to edit
3. Recover log 8, add new sst files to edit
4. Commit all added sst files to manifest and mark log files 5, 7 and 8 as recoverd (via SetLogNumber(9) function)
After the change, we'll do:
1. Recover log 5, commit the new sst files and set log 5 as recovered
2. Recover log 7, commit the new sst files and set log 7 as recovered
3. Recover log 8, commit the new sst files and set log 8 as recovered
The added (small) benefit is that if we fail after (2), the new recovery will only have to recover log 8. In previous case, we'll have to restart the recovery from the beginning. The bigger benefit will be to enable easier integration of multiple column families in Recovery code path.
[1] I'm happy to dicuss this decison, but I believe this is the cleanest way to go. It also makes backward compatibility much easier. We don't have a requirement of adding multiple column families atomically.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15237
Summary: I'm separating code-cleanup part of https://reviews.facebook.net/D14517. This will make D14517 easier to understand and this diff easier to review.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, sdong, dhruba, tnovak
Reviewed By: tnovak
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15099
Summary:
This diff fixes 2 hacks:
* The callback function can modify the existing value inplace, if the merged value fits within the existing buffer size. But currently the existing buffer size is not being modified. Now the callback recieves a int* allowing the size to be modified. Since size is encoded as a varint in the internal key for memtable. It might happen that the entire value might have be copied to the new location if the new size varint is smaller than the existing size varint.
* The callback function has 3 functionalities
1. Modify existing buffer inplace, and update size correspondingly. Now to indicate that, Returns 1.
2. Generate a new buffer indicating merged value. Returns 2.
3. Fails to do either of above, based on whatever application logic. Returns 0.
Test Plan: Just make all for now. I'm adding another unit test to test each scenario.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, sdong, kailiu, xinyaohu, sumeet, danguo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15195
Summary:
When doing CompactRange(), we should first flush the memtable and then calculate max_level_with_files. Also, we want to compact all the levels that have files, including level `max_level_with_files`.
This patch fixed the unit test.
Test Plan: Added a failing unit test and a fix, so it's not failing anymore.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14421
Summary:
I will submit a sequence of diffs that are preparing master branch for column families. There are a lot of implicit assumptions in the code that are making column family implementation hard. If I make the change only in column family branch, it will make merging back to master impossible.
Most of the diffs will be simple code refactorings, so I hope we can have fast turnaround time. Feel free to grab me in person to discuss any of them.
This diff removes number of level check from VersionEdit. It is used only when VersionEdit is read, not written, but has to be set when it is written. I believe it is a right thing to make VersionEdit dumb and check consistency on the caller side. This will also make it much easier to implement Column Families, since different column families can have different number of levels.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15159
Summary: When building batch group, don't actually build a new batch since it requires heavy-weight mem copy and malloc. Only store references to the batches and build the batch group without lock held.
Test Plan:
`make check`
I am also planning to run performance tests. The workload that will benefit from this change is readwhilewriting. I will post the results once I have them.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15063
Summary: The application can set a callback function, which is applied on the previous value. And calculates the new value. This new value can be set, either inplace, if the previous value existed in memtable, and new value is smaller than previous value. Otherwise the new value is added normally.
Test Plan: fbmake. Added unit tests. All unit tests pass.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: sdong, kailiu, xinyaohu, sumeet, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14745
Summary:
In some use cases, table readers for all live files should always be cached. In that case, there will be an opportunity to avoid the table cache look-up while Get() and NewIterator().
We define options.max_open_files = -1 to be the mode that table readers for live files will always be kept. In that mode, table readers are cached in FileMetaData (with a reference count hold in table cache). So that when executing table_cache.Get() and table_cache.newInterator(), LRU cache checking can be by-passed, to reduce latency.
Test Plan: add a test case in db_test
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: dhruba, igor, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15039
Summary:
Implement a mem table, in which keys are hashed based on prefixes. In each bucket, entries are organized in a sorted linked list. It has the same thread safety guarantee as skip list.
The motivation is to optimize memory usage for the case that prefix hashing is primary way of seeking to the entry. Compared to hash skip list implementation, this implementation is more memory efficient, but inside each bucket, search is always linear. The target scenario is that there are only very limited number of records in each hash bucket.
Test Plan: Add a test case in db_test
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: igor, nkg-, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14979
