Summary:
We're going to support more locking protocols such as range lock in transaction.
However, in current design, `TransactionBase` has a member `tracked_keys` which assumes that point lock (lock a single key) is used, and is used in snapshot checking (isolation protocol). When using range lock, we may use read committed instead of snapshot checking as the isolation protocol.
The most significant usage scenarios of `tracked_keys` are:
1. pessimistic transaction uses it to track the locked keys, and unlock these keys when commit or rollback.
2. optimistic transaction does not lock keys upfront, it only tracks the lock intentions in tracked_keys, and do write conflict checking when commit.
3. each `SavePoint` tracks the keys that are locked since the `SavePoint`, `RollbackToSavePoint` or `PopSavePoint` relies on both the tracked keys in `SavePoint`s and `tracked_keys`.
Based on these scenarios, if we can abstract out a `LockTracker` interface to hold a set of tracked locks (can be keys or key ranges), and have methods that can be composed together to implement the scenarios, then `tracked_keys` can be an internal data structure of one implementation of `LockTracker`. See `utilities/transactions/lock/lock_tracker.h` for the detailed interface design, and `utilities/transactions/lock/point_lock_tracker.cc` for the implementation.
In the future, a `RangeLockTracker` can be implemented to track range locks without affecting other components.
After this PR, a clean interface for lock manager should be possible, and then ideally, we can have pluggable locking protocols.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7013
Test Plan: Run `transaction_test` and `optimistic_transaction_test`.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D22163706
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: f2860577b5334e31dd2994f5bc6d7c40d502b1b4
Summary:
Confusing checks for null that are never null
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6933
Test Plan: make check
Reviewed By: cheng-chang
Differential Revision: D21885466
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 4b48e03c2a33727f2702b0d12292f9fda5a3c475
Summary:
The dynamic_cast in the filter benchmark causes release mode to fail due to
no-rtti. Replace with static_cast_with_check.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Pallas <derrick@pallas.us>
Addition by peterd: Remove unnecessary 2nd template arg on all static_cast_with_check
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6732
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D21304260
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 6e8eb437c4ca5a16dbbfa4053d67c4ad55f1608c
Summary:
When dynamically linking two binaries together, different builds of RocksDB from two sources might cause errors. To provide a tool for user to solve the problem, the RocksDB namespace is changed to a flag which can be overridden in build time.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6433
Test Plan: Build release, all and jtest. Try to build with ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE with another flag.
Differential Revision: D19977691
fbshipit-source-id: aa7f2d0972e1c31d75339ac48478f34f6cfcfb3e
Summary:
**NOTE**: this also needs to be back-ported to 6.4.6 and possibly older branches if further releases from them is envisaged.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6081
Differential Revision: D18710107
Pulled By: zhichao-cao
fbshipit-source-id: 03260f9316566e2bfc12c7d702d6338bb7941e01
Summary:
For MDEV-19670: MyRocks: key lookups into deleted data are very slow
BaseDeltaIterator remembers iterate_upper_bound and will not let delta_iterator_
walk above the iterate_upper_bound if base_iterator_ is not valid
anymore.
== Rationale ==
The most straightforward way would be to make the delta_iterator
(which is a rocksdb::WBWIIterator) to support iterator bounds. But
checking for bounds has an extra CPU overhead.
So we put the check into BaseDeltaIterator, and only make it when
base_iterator_ is not valid.
(note: We could take it even further, and move the check a few lines
down, and only check iterator bounds ourselves if base_iterator_ is
not valid AND delta_iterator_ hit a tombstone).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5403
Differential Revision: D15863092
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 8da458e7b9af95ff49356666f69664b4a6ccf49b
Summary:
This PR eliminates repeated lookups in associative or ordered containers when a single lookup suffices.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5875
Differential Revision: D17753172
Pulled By: anand1976
fbshipit-source-id: 796b02b760082521d8c42a1cb65a76bf0e6c1b8e
Summary:
Further apply formatter to more recent commits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5830
Test Plan: Run all existing tests.
Differential Revision: D17488031
fbshipit-source-id: 137458fd94d56dd271b8b40c522b03036943a2ab
Summary:
This avoids rehashing the key in TrackKey() in case the key is not already
in the map of tracked keys, which will happen at least once per key used in a
transaction.
Additionally fix two typos.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5696
Differential Revision: D17210178
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: 7e2c28e9e505c1d1c1535d435250cf2b191a6fdf
Summary:
Add savepoint support when the current transaction has flushed unprepared batches.
Rolling back to savepoint is similar to rolling back a transaction. It requires the set of keys that have changed since the savepoint, re-reading the keys at the snapshot at that savepoint, and the restoring the old keys by writing out another unprepared batch.
For this strategy to work though, we must be capable of reading keys at a savepoint. This does not work if keys were written out using the same sequence number before and after a savepoint. Therefore, when we flush out unprepared batches, we must split the batch by savepoint if any savepoints exist.
eg. If we have the following:
```
Put(A)
Put(B)
Put(C)
SetSavePoint()
Put(D)
Put(E)
SetSavePoint()
Put(F)
```
Then we will write out 3 separate unprepared batches:
```
Put(A) 1
Put(B) 1
Put(C) 1
Put(D) 2
Put(E) 2
Put(F) 3
```
This is so that when we rollback to eg. the first savepoint, we can just read keys at snapshot_seq = 1.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5627
Differential Revision: D16584130
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: 6d100dd548fb20c4b76661bd0f8a2647e64477fa
Summary:
Transaction::RollbackToSavePoint undos the modification made since the SavePoint beginning, and also unlocks the corresponding keys, which are tracked in the last SavePoint. Currently ::PopSavePoint simply discard these tracked keys, leaving them locked in the lock manager. This breaks a subsequent ::RollbackToSavePoint behavior as it loses track of such keys, and thus cannot unlock them. The patch fixes ::PopSavePoint by passing on the track key information to the previous SavePoint.
Fixes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/5618
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5628
Differential Revision: D16505325
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: 2bc3b30963ab4d36d996d1f66543c93abf358980
Summary:
When using `PRIu64` type of printf specifier, current code base does the following:
```
#ifndef __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS
#define __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS
#endif
#include <inttypes.h>
```
However, this can be simplified to
```
#include <cinttypes>
```
as long as flag `-std=c++11` is used.
This should solve issues like https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/5159
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5402
Differential Revision: D15701195
Pulled By: miasantreble
fbshipit-source-id: 6dac0a05f52aadb55e9728038599d3d2e4b59d03
Summary:
MultiGet batching was implemented in #5011 in order to reduce CPU utilization when looking up multiple keys at once. This PR implements corresponding ```MultiGet``` and ```MultiGetSingleCFForUpdate``` in ```rocksdb::Transaction``` that call the underlying batching implementation.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5210
Differential Revision: D15048164
Pulled By: anand1976
fbshipit-source-id: c52f6043102ab0cbc723f4cba2a7b7d1767f6f52
Summary:
Savepoints are assumed to be used in a stack-wise fashion (only
the top element should be used), so they were stored by `WriteBatch`
in a member variable `save_points` using an std::stack.
Conceptually this is fine, but the implementation had a few issues:
- the `save_points_` instance variable was a plain pointer to a heap-
allocated `SavePoints` struct. The destructor of `WriteBatch` simply
deletes this pointer. However, the copy constructor of WriteBatch
just copied that pointer, meaning that copying a WriteBatch with
active savepoints will very likely have crashed before. Now a proper
copy of the savepoints is made in the copy constructor, and not just
a copy of the pointer
- `save_points_` was an std::stack, which defaults to `std::deque` for
the underlying container. A deque is a bit over the top here, as we
only need access to the most recent savepoint (i.e. stack.top()) but
never any elements at the front. std::deque is rather expensive to
initialize in common environments. For example, the STL implementation
shipped with GNU g++ will perform a heap allocation of more than 500
bytes to create an empty deque object. Although the `save_points_`
container is created lazily by RocksDB, moving from a deque to a plain
`std::vector` is much more memory-efficient. So `save_points_` is now
a vector.
- `save_points_` was changed from a plain pointer to an `std::unique_ptr`,
making ownership more explicit.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5192
Differential Revision: D15024074
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 5b128786d3789cde94e46465c9e91badd07a25d7
Summary:
The LockInfo struct is not easy to copy because it contains std::vector. Reduce copies by using move constructor and `unordered_map::emplace`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5172
Differential Revision: D14882053
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: 93999ec6ab1a5841fb5115abb764b6c1831a6de1
Summary:
The patch adds the sequence number of the rollback patch to the PrepareHeap when two_write_queues is enabled. Although the current behavior is still correct, the change simplifies reasoning about the code, by having all uncommitted batches registered with the PreparedHeap.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5026
Differential Revision: D14249401
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 1e3424edee5cd14e56ee35931ad3c93ed997cd5a
Summary:
The transaction stress tests, stress a high concurrency scenario. In WritePrepared/WriteUnPrepared we need to also stress the scenarios where an inserting/reading transaction is very slow. This would stress the corner cases that the caching is not sufficient and other slower data structures are engaged. To emulate such cases we make use of slow inserter/verifier threads and also reduce the size of cache data structures.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4974
Differential Revision: D14143070
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 81eb674678faf9fae0f654cd60ebcc74e26aeee7
Summary:
Transaction::GetForUpdate is extended with a do_validate parameter with default value of true. If false it skips validating the snapshot (if there is any) before doing the read. After the read it also returns the latest value (expects the ReadOptions::snapshot to be nullptr). This allows RocksDB applications to use GetForUpdate similarly to how InnoDB does. Similarly ::Merge, ::Put, ::Delete, and ::SingleDelete are extended with assume_exclusive_tracked with default value of false. It true it indicates that call is assumed to be after a ::GetForUpdate(do_validate=false).
The Java APIs are accordingly updated.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4680
Differential Revision: D13068508
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: f0b59db28f7f6a078b60844d902057140765e67d
Summary:
Current implementation of `current_over_upper_bound_` fails to take into consideration that keys might be invalid in either base iterator or delta iterator. Calling key() in such scenario will lead to assertion failure and runtime errors.
This PR addresses the bug by adding check for valid keys before calling `IsOverUpperBound()`, also added test coverage for iterate_upper_bound usage in BaseDeltaIterator
Also recommit https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4656 (It was reverted earlier due to bugs)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4702
Differential Revision: D13146643
Pulled By: miasantreble
fbshipit-source-id: 6d136929da12d0f2e2a5cea474a8038ec5cdf1d0
Summary:
Currently transaction iterator does not apply `ReadOptions.iterate_upper_bound` when iterating. This PR attempts to fix the problem by having `BaseDeltaIterator` enforcing the upper bound check when iterator state is changed.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4656
Differential Revision: D13039257
Pulled By: miasantreble
fbshipit-source-id: 909eb9f6b4597a4d80418fb139f32ec82c6ec1d1
Summary:
Transaction has had methods to deal with SavePoints already, but
was missing the PopSavePoint method provided by WriteBatch and
WriteBatchWithIndex.
This PR adds PopSavePoint to Transaction as well. Having the method
on Transaction-level too is useful for applications that repeatedly
execute a sequence of operations that normally succeed, but infrequently
need to get rolled back. Using SavePoints here is sensible, but as
operations normally succeed the application may pile up a lot of
useless SavePoints inside a Transaction, leading to slightly increased
memory usage for managing the unneeded SavePoints.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4256
Differential Revision: D9326932
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 53a0af18a6c7e87feff8a56f1f3eab9df7f371d6
Summary:
This adds support for recovering WriteUnprepared transactions through the following changes:
- The information in `RecoveredTransaction` is extended so that it can reference multiple batches.
- `MarkBeginPrepare` is extended with a bool indicating whether it is an unprepared begin, and this is passed down to `InsertRecoveredTransaction` to indicate whether the current transaction is prepared or not.
- `WriteUnpreparedTxnDB::Initialize` is overridden so that it will rollback unprepared transactions from the recovered transactions. This can be done without updating the prepare heap/commit map, because this is before the DB has finished initializing, and after writing the rollback batch, those data structures should not contain information about the rolled back transaction anyway.
Commit/Rollback of live transactions is still unimplemented and will come later.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4078
Differential Revision: D8703382
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: 7e0aada6c23bd39299f1f20d6c060492e0e6b60a
Summary:
This patch clarifies and refactors the logic around tracked keys in transactions.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3140
Differential Revision: D6290258
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 03b50646264cbcc550813c060b180fc7451a55c1
Summary:
Looks like the API is simply missing. Adding it.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2937
Differential Revision: D5919955
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 6e2e9c96c29882b0bb4113d1f8efb72bffc57878
Summary:
The ::Get from DB is not augmented with an overload method that takes a PinnableSlice instead of a string. Transactions however are not yet upgraded to use the new API. As a result, transaction users such as MyRocks cannot benefit from it. This patch updates the transactional API with a PinnableSlice overload.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2736
Differential Revision: D5645770
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: f6af520df902f842de1bcf99bed3e8dfc43ad96d
Summary:
Upgrading a shared lock was silently succeeding because the actual locking code was skipped. This is because if the keys are tracked, it is assumed that they are already locked and do not require locking. Fix this by recording in tracked keys whether the key was locked exclusively or not.
Note that lock downgrades are impossible, which is the behaviour we expect.
This fixesfacebook/mysql-5.6#587.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2122
Differential Revision: D4861489
Pulled By: IslamAbdelRahman
fbshipit-source-id: 58c7ebe7af098bf01b9774b666d3e9867747d8fd
Summary:
Extend TransactionOptions to include max_write_batch_size which determines the maximum size of the writebatch representation. If memory limit is exceeded, the operation will abort with subcode kMemoryLimit.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2124
Differential Revision: D4861842
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: 46fd172ea67cc90bbba829bf0d70cfab2261c161
Summary:
This is an implementation of non-exclusive locks for pessimistic transactions. It is relatively simple and does not prevent starvation (ie. it's possible that request for exclusive access will never be granted if there are always threads holding shared access). It is done by changing `KeyLockInfo` to hold an set a transaction ids, instead of just one, and adding a flag specifying whether this lock is currently held with exclusive access or not.
Some implementation notes:
- Some lock diagnostic functions had to be updated to return a set of transaction ids for a given lock, eg. `GetWaitingTxn` and `GetLockStatusData`.
- Deadlock detection is a bit more complicated since a transaction can now wait on multiple other transactions. A BFS is done in this case, and deadlock detection depth is now just a limit on the number of transactions we visit.
- Expirable transactions do not work efficiently with shared locks at the moment, but that's okay for now.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1573
Differential Revision: D4239097
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: da7c074
Summary: Previously, reusing a transaction (by passing it as an argument to BeginTransaction) would not clear the transaction's snapshot. This is not a clear, well-definited behavior.
Test Plan: improved test
Reviewers: sdong, IslamAbdelRahman, horuff, jkedgar
Reviewed By: jkedgar
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D55053
Summary: Add function to reinitialize a transaction object so that it can be reused. This is an optimization so users can potentially avoid reallocating transaction objects.
Test Plan: added tests
Reviewers: yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: jkedgar, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D53835
Summary: MyRocks wants to be able to un-lock a key that was just locked by GetForUpdate(). To do this safely, I am now keeping track of the number of reads(for update) and writes for each key in a transaction. UndoGetForUpdate() will only unlock a key if it hasn't been written and the read count reaches 0.
Test Plan: more unit tests
Reviewers: igor, rven, yhchiang, spetrunia, sdong
Reviewed By: spetrunia, sdong
Subscribers: spetrunia, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D47043
Summary:
D51183 was reverted due to breaking the LITE build.
This diff is the same as D51183 but with a fix for the LITE BUILD(D51693)
Test Plan: run all unit tests
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D51711
Summary:
D50475 enables using SST files for transaction write-conflict checking. In order for this to work, we need to make sure not to compact out SingleDeletes when there is an earlier transaction snapshot(D50295). If there is a long-held snapshot, this could reduce the benefit of the SingleDelete optimization.
This diff allows Transactions to mark snapshots as being used for write-conflict checking. Then, during compaction, we will be able to optimize SingleDeletes better in the future.
This diff adds a flag to SnapshotImpl which is used by Transactions. This diff also passes the earliest write-conflict snapshot's sequence number to CompactionIterator. This diff does not actually change Compaction (after this diff is pushed, D50295 will be able to use this information).
Test Plan: no behavior change, ran existing tests
Reviewers: rven, kradhakrishnan, yhchiang, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D51183
Summary: When SetSnapshot() is used the caller immediately knows a snapshot has been created, but when SetSnapshotOnNextOperation() is used the caller needs a way to get notified when that snapshot has been generated. This creates an interface that the client can implement that will be called at the time the snapshot is created.
Test Plan: Added a new SetSnapshotOnNextOperationWithNotification test into the transaction_test.
Reviewers: sdong, anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: yoshinorim, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D51177
Summary: Support for Transaction::CreateSnapshotOnNextOperation(). This is to fix a write-conflict race-condition that Yoshinori was running into when testing MyRocks with LinkBench.
Test Plan: New tests
Reviewers: yhchiang, spetrunia, rven, igor, yoshinorim, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D48099
