Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Maysam Yabandeh
10d14693ac WritePrepared: fix ValidateSnapshot with long-running txn (#4961)
Summary:
ValidateSnapshot checks if another txn has committed a value to about-to-be-locked key since a particular snapshot. It applies an optimization of looking into only the memtable if snapshot seq is larger than the earliest seq in the memtables. With a long-running txn in WritePrepared, the prepared value might be flushed out to the disk and yet it commits after the snapshot, which breaks this optimization. The patch fixes that by disabling this optimization when the min_uncomitted seq at the time the snapshot was taken is lower than earliest seq in the memtables.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4961

Differential Revision: D14009947

Pulled By: maysamyabandeh

fbshipit-source-id: 1d11679950326f7c4094b433e6b821b729f08850
2019-02-08 18:01:25 -08:00
Maysam Yabandeh
02693f64fc WritePrepared Txn: ValidateSnapshot
Summary:
Implements ValidateSnapshot for WritePrepared txns and also adds a unit test to clarify the contract of this function.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3101

Differential Revision: D6199405

Pulled By: maysamyabandeh

fbshipit-source-id: ace509934c307ea5d26f4bbac5f836d7c80fd240
2017-11-01 19:11:09 -07:00
Siying Dong
3c327ac2d0 Change RocksDB License
Summary: Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2589

Differential Revision: D5431502

Pulled By: siying

fbshipit-source-id: 8ebf8c87883daa9daa54b2303d11ce01ab1f6f75
2017-07-15 16:11:23 -07:00
Manuel Ung
9300ef5455 Fix shared lock upgrades
Summary:
Upgrading a shared lock was silently succeeding because the actual locking code was skipped. This is because if the keys are tracked, it is assumed that they are already locked and do not require locking. Fix this by recording in tracked keys whether the key was locked exclusively or not.

Note that lock downgrades are impossible, which is the behaviour we expect.

This fixes facebook/mysql-5.6#587.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2122

Differential Revision: D4861489

Pulled By: IslamAbdelRahman

fbshipit-source-id: 58c7ebe7af098bf01b9774b666d3e9867747d8fd
2017-04-10 16:06:00 -07:00
Baraa Hamodi
21e95811d1 Updated all copyright headers to the new format. 2016-02-09 15:12:00 -08:00
agiardullo
fe93bf9b5d Transaction::UndoGetForUpdate
Summary: MyRocks wants to be able to un-lock a key that was just locked by GetForUpdate().  To do this safely, I am now keeping track of the number of reads(for update) and writes for each key in a transaction.  UndoGetForUpdate() will only unlock a key if it hasn't been written and the read count reaches 0.

Test Plan: more unit tests

Reviewers: igor, rven, yhchiang, spetrunia, sdong

Reviewed By: spetrunia, sdong

Subscribers: spetrunia, dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D47043
2016-02-09 10:46:11 -08:00
agiardullo
3bfd3d39a3 Use SST files for Transaction conflict detection
Summary:
Currently, transactions can fail even if there is no actual write conflict.  This is due to relying on only the memtables to check for write-conflicts.  Users have to tune memtable settings to try to avoid this, but it's hard to figure out exactly how to tune these settings.

With this diff, TransactionDB will use both memtables and SST files to determine if there are any write conflicts.  This relies on the fact that BlockBasedTable stores sequence numbers for all writes that happen after any open snapshot.  Also, D50295 is needed to prevent SingleDelete from disappearing writes (the TODOs in this test code will be fixed once the other diff is approved and merged).

Note that Optimistic transactions will still rely on tuning memtable settings as we do not want to read from SST while on the write thread.  Also, memtable settings can still be used to reduce how often TransactionDB needs to read SST files.

Test Plan: unit tests, db bench

Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong

Reviewed By: sdong

Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb, yoshinorim

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50475
2015-12-11 12:34:11 -08:00
agiardullo
a3fc49bfdd Transactions: Release Locks when rolling back to a savepoint
Summary: Transaction::RollbackToSavePoint() will now release any locks that were taken since the previous SavePoint.  To do this cleanly, I moved tracked_keys_ management into TransactionBase.

Test Plan: New Transaction test.

Reviewers: igor, rven, sdong

Reviewed By: sdong

Subscribers: dhruba, spetrunia, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D46761
2015-09-11 18:10:50 -07:00
agiardullo
c3466eab07 Have Transactions use WriteBatch::RollbackToSavePoint
Summary:
Clean up transactions to use the new RollbackToSavePoint api in WriteBatchWithIndex.

Note, this diff depends on Pessimistic Transactions diff and ManagedSnapshot diff (D40869 and D43293).

Test Plan: unit tests

Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, spetrunia, sdong

Reviewed By: sdong

Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43371
2015-08-11 17:53:30 -07:00
agiardullo
c2f2cb0214 Pessimistic Transactions
Summary:
Initial implementation of Pessimistic Transactions.  This diff contains the api changes discussed in D38913.  This diff is pretty large, so let me know if people would prefer to meet up to discuss it.

MyRocks folks:  please take a look at the API in include/rocksdb/utilities/transaction[_db].h and let me know if you have any issues.

Also, you'll notice a couple of TODOs in the implementation of RollbackToSavePoint().  After chatting with Siying, I'm going to send out a separate diff for an alternate implementation of this feature that implements the rollback inside of WriteBatch/WriteBatchWithIndex.  We can then decide which route is preferable.

Next, I'm planning on doing some perf testing and then integrating this diff into MongoRocks for further testing.

Test Plan: Unit tests, db_bench parallel testing.

Reviewers: igor, rven, sdong, yhchiang, yoshinorim

Reviewed By: sdong

Subscribers: hermanlee4, maykov, spetrunia, leveldb, dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40869
2015-08-11 17:52:23 -07:00