Summary:
Newer gflags switched from `google` namespace to `gflags` namespace. See: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/139 and https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/102
Unfortunately, they don't define any macro with their namespace, so we need to actually try to compile gflags with two different namespace to figure out which one is the correct one.
Test Plan: works in fbcode environemnt. I'll also try in ubutnu with newer gflags
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18537
Summary: A bad Auto-Merge caused log buffer is flushed twice. Remove the unintended one.
Test Plan: Should already be tested (the code looks the same as when I ran unit tests).
Reviewers: haobo, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: ljin, yhchiang, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16821
Summary: RocksDB doesn't compile on 32-bit architecture apparently. This is attempt to fix some of 32-bit errors. They are reported here: https://gist.github.com/paxos/8789697
Test Plan: RocksDB still compiles on 64-bit :)
Reviewers: kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15825
Summary:
It looks like we might have some trouble when building the new release with 4.8, since fbcode is using glibc2.17-fb by default and we are using glibc2.17. It was reported by Benjamin Renard in our internal group.
This diff moves our fbcode build to use glibc2.17-fb by default. I got some linker errors when compiling, complaining that `google::SetUsageMessage()` was undefined. After deleting all offending lines, the compile was successful and everything works.
Test Plan:
Compiled
Ran ./db_bench ./db_stress ./db_repl_stress
Reviewers: kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15405
Summary: This diff invoves some more complicated issues in the posix environment.
Test Plan: works under mac os. will need to verify dev box.
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14061
Summary:
Archive cleaning will still happen every WAL_ttl seconds
but archived logs will be deleted only if archive size
is greater then a WAL_size_limit value.
Empty archived logs will be deleted evety WAL_ttl.
Test Plan:
1. Unit tests pass.
2. Benchmark.
Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu, igor
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13869
Summary: Converted db_stress, db_repl_stress and db_bench to use gflags
Test Plan: I tested by printing out all the flags from old and new versions. Tried defaults, + various combinations with "interesting flags". Also, tested by running db_crashtest.py and db_crashtest2.py.
Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13581
Summary:
Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb. This allows a single
application to link in open-source leveldb code as well as
rocksdb code into the same process.
Test Plan: compile rocksdb
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13287
Summary: Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.
Test Plan:
make clean; make check
make clean; make release
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12489
Summary: Also expanded class LogFile to have startSequene and FileSize and exposed it publicly
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12087
Summary:
Store the last flushed, seq no. in db_impl. Check against it in
transaction Log iterator. Do not attempt to read ahead if we do not know
if the data is flushed completely.
Does not work if flush is disabled. Any ideas on fixing that?
* Minor change, iter->Next is called the first time automatically for
* the first time.
Test Plan:
existing test pass.
More ideas on testing this?
Planning to run some stress test.
Reviewers: dhruba, heyongqiang
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9087
Summary:
Previously, if you opened a db with num_levels set lower than
the database, you received the unhelpful message "Corruption:
VersionEdit: new-file entry." Now you get a more verbose message
describing the issue.
Also, fix handling of compression_levels (both the run-over-the-end
issue and the memory management of it).
Lastly, unique_ptr'ify a couple of minor calls.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8151
Summary:
Create an Executable with
* A thread to do Put's
* A thread to use GetUpdatesSince. Check if we miss any sequence
Numbers.
Test Plan: It runs.
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D7383
