Summary:
Currently it is not possible to change bloom filter config without restart the db, which is causing a lot of operational complexity for users.
This PR aims to make it possible to dynamically change bloom filter config.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3601
Differential Revision: D7253114
Pulled By: miasantreble
fbshipit-source-id: f22595437d3e0b86c95918c484502de2ceca120c
Summary:
db/column_family.h :
79 ColumnFamilyHandleInternal()
CID 1322806 (#1 of 1): Uninitialized pointer field (UNINIT_CTOR)
2. uninit_member: Non-static class member internal_cfd_ is not initialized in this constructor nor in any functions that it calls.
80 : ColumnFamilyHandleImpl(nullptr, nullptr, nullptr) {}
db/compacted_db_impl.cc:
18CompactedDBImpl::CompactedDBImpl(
19 const DBOptions& options, const std::string& dbname)
20 : DBImpl(options, dbname) {
2. uninit_member: Non-static class member cfd_ is not initialized in this constructor nor in any functions that it calls.
4. uninit_member: Non-static class member version_ is not initialized in this constructor nor in any functions that it calls.
CID 1396120 (#1 of 1): Uninitialized pointer field (UNINIT_CTOR)
6. uninit_member: Non-static class member user_comparator_ is not initialized in this constructor nor in any functions that it calls.
21}
db/compaction_iterator.cc:
9. uninit_member: Non-static class member current_user_key_sequence_ is not initialized in this constructor nor in any functions that it calls.
11. uninit_member: Non-static class member current_user_key_snapshot_ is not initialized in this constructor nor in any functions that it calls.
CID 1419855 (#1 of 1): Uninitialized scalar field (UNINIT_CTOR)
13. uninit_member: Non-static class member current_key_committed_ is not initialized in this constructor nor in any functions that it calls.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3084
Differential Revision: D6172999
Pulled By: sagar0
fbshipit-source-id: 084d73393faf8022c01359cfb445807b6a782460
Summary:
Add a new function in Listener to let the caller know when rocksdb
is stalling writes.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2897
Differential Revision: D5860124
Pulled By: schischi
fbshipit-source-id: ee791606169aa64f772c86f817cebf02624e05e1
Summary:
PinnableSlice
Summary:
Currently the point lookup values are copied to a string provided by the
user. This incures an extra memcpy cost. This patch allows doing point lookup
via a PinnableSlice which pins the source memory location (instead of
copying their content) and releases them after the content is consumed
by the user. The old API of Get(string) is translated to the new API
underneath.
Here is the summary for improvements:
value 100 byte: 1.8% regular, 1.2% merge values
value 1k byte: 11.5% regular, 7.5% merge values
value 10k byte: 26% regular, 29.9% merge values
The improvement for merge could be more if we extend this approach to
pin the merge output and delay the full merge operation until the user
actually needs it. We have put that for future work.
PS:
Sometimes we observe a small decrease in performance when switching from
t5452014 to this patch but with the old Get(string) API. The d
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1756
Differential Revision: D4391738
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 6f3edd3
Summary:
Currently the point lookup values are copied to a string provided by the user.
This incures an extra memcpy cost. This patch allows doing point lookup
via a PinnableSlice which pins the source memory location (instead of
copying their content) and releases them after the content is consumed
by the user. The old API of Get(string) is translated to the new API
underneath.
Here is the summary for improvements:
1. value 100 byte: 1.8% regular, 1.2% merge values
2. value 1k byte: 11.5% regular, 7.5% merge values
3. value 10k byte: 26% regular, 29.9% merge values
The improvement for merge could be more if we extend this approach to
pin the merge output and delay the full merge operation until the user
actually needs it. We have put that for future work.
PS:
Sometimes we observe a small decrease in performance when switching from
t5452014 to this patch but with the old Get(string) API. The difference
is a little and could be noise. More importantly it is safely
cancelled
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1732
Differential Revision: D4374613
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: a077f1a
Summary:
During Get()/MultiGet(), build up a RangeDelAggregator with range
tombstones as we search through live memtable, immutable memtables, and
SST files. This aggregator is then used by memtable.cc's SaveValue() and
GetContext::SaveValue() to check whether keys are covered.
added tests for Get on memtables/files; end-to-end tests mainly in https://reviews.facebook.net/D64761
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1456
Differential Revision: D4111271
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 6e388d4
Summary: Use ImmutableDBOptions/MutableDBOptions internally and DBOptions only for user-facing APIs. MutableDBOptions is barely a placeholder for now. I'll start to move options to MutableDBOptions in following diffs.
Test Plan:
make all check
Reviewers: yhchiang, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D64065
Summary: CompactedDB skips memtable. So we shouldn't use compacted DB if there is outstanding WAL files.
Test Plan: Change to options.max_open_files = -1 perf context test to create a compacted DB, which we shouldn't do.
Reviewers: yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: leveldb, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57057
Summary: Seems like the cleanest way to resolve this is to move CompactedDBImpl into db/. CompactedDBImpl should probably live in the same place as DBImplReadonly since Opening the latter could end up instantiating the former. Both DBImplReadonly and CompactedDBImpl inherit from DBImpl access protected members of DBImpl( and the latter access friendly private methods).
Test Plan: unit tests
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42027
