d80ce7f99a
Summary: Since Andres' internship is over, I took over https://reviews.facebook.net/D42555 and rebased and simplified it a bit. The behavior in this diff is a bit simpler than in D42555: * only merge operators are passed through FilterMergeValue(). If fitler function returns true, the merge operator is ignored * compaction filter is *not* called on: 1) results of merge operations and 2) base values that are getting merged with merge operands (the second case was also true in previous diff) Do we also need a compaction filter to get called on merge results? Test Plan: make && make check Reviewers: lovro, tnovak, rven, yhchiang, sdong Reviewed By: sdong Subscribers: noetzli, kolmike, leveldb, dhruba, sdong Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D47847
8 lines
155 B
Plaintext
8 lines
155 B
Plaintext
c_simple_example
|
|
column_families_example
|
|
compact_files_example
|
|
compaction_filter_example
|
|
optimistic_transaction_example
|
|
simple_example
|
|
transaction_example
|