Summary:
1. Polish IterKey a little bit.
2. Turn to use it in local parameter of current_user_key in DBImpl::ProcessKeyValueCompaction(). Our profile showing that DBImpl::ProcessKeyValueCompaction() has about 14% costs in std::string (the base including reading and writing data but excluding compaction filtering), which is higher than it should be. There are two std::string used in DBImpl::ProcessKeyValueCompaction(), compaction_filter_value and current_user_key and it's hard to distinguish the two.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, ljin
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: igor, yhchiang, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17613
Conflicts:
db/db_impl.cc
258eac1772