49628c9a83
Summary: Right now we still don't fully use std::numeric_limits but use a macro, mainly for supporting VS 2013. Right now we only support VS 2017 and up so it is not a problem. The code comment claims that MinGW still needs it. We don't have a CI running MinGW so it's hard to validate. since we now require C++17, it's hard to imagine MinGW would still build RocksDB but doesn't support std::numeric_limits<>. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9954 Test Plan: See CI Runs. Reviewed By: riversand963 Differential Revision: D36173954 fbshipit-source-id: a35a73af17cdcae20e258cdef57fcf29a50b49e0 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
cf_options.cc | ||
cf_options.h | ||
configurable_helper.h | ||
configurable_test.cc | ||
configurable_test.h | ||
configurable.cc | ||
customizable_test.cc | ||
customizable.cc | ||
db_options.cc | ||
db_options.h | ||
options_helper.cc | ||
options_helper.h | ||
options_parser.cc | ||
options_parser.h | ||
options_settable_test.cc | ||
options_test.cc | ||
options.cc |