c4bc30e12d
Summary: The function was left unimplemented. Although we currently don't have a use for that it was declared with an assert(0) to prevent mistakenly using the remove_prefix of the parent class. The function body with only assert(0) however causes issues with some compiler's warning levels. The patch implements the function to avoid the warning. It also piggybacks some minor code warning for unnecessary semicolons after the function definition.s Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6330 Differential Revision: D19559062 Pulled By: maysamyabandeh fbshipit-source-id: 3a022484f688c9abd4556e5412bcc2628ab96a00 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
rocksdb |