xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright © 2017 Red Hat Inc.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
|
|
|
|
* obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
|
|
|
|
* files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without
|
|
|
|
* restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy,
|
|
|
|
* modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies
|
|
|
|
* of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
|
|
|
|
* furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including
|
|
|
|
* the next paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial
|
|
|
|
* portions of the Software.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
|
|
|
|
* EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
|
|
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
|
|
|
|
* NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT
|
|
|
|
* HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
|
|
|
|
* WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
|
|
|
|
* OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
|
|
|
|
* DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Authors:
|
|
|
|
* Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2019-12-16 17:23:30 +01:00
|
|
|
#include <xwayland-config.h>
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define MESA_EGL_NO_X11_HEADERS
|
2019-11-04 20:03:17 +01:00
|
|
|
#define EGL_NO_X11
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
#include <glamor_egl.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <glamor.h>
|
2021-04-30 16:23:10 +02:00
|
|
|
#include <glamor_priv.h>
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
#include <glamor_transform.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <glamor_transfer.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <xf86drm.h>
|
2020-12-03 23:57:51 +01:00
|
|
|
#include <dri3.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <drm_fourcc.h>
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <epoxy/egl.h>
|
|
|
|
|
2019-12-16 17:23:30 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "xwayland-glamor.h"
|
2019-12-17 17:07:58 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "xwayland-pixmap.h"
|
2019-12-18 10:03:43 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "xwayland-screen.h"
|
2019-12-23 09:26:17 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "xwayland-window.h"
|
2019-12-16 17:23:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "wayland-eglstream-client-protocol.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "wayland-eglstream-controller-client-protocol.h"
|
2020-12-03 23:57:51 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "linux-dmabuf-unstable-v1-client-protocol.h"
|
2019-12-16 17:23:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
struct xwl_eglstream_private {
|
|
|
|
EGLDeviceEXT egl_device;
|
|
|
|
struct wl_eglstream_display *display;
|
|
|
|
struct wl_eglstream_controller *controller;
|
|
|
|
uint32_t display_caps;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EGLConfig config;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bool have_egl_damage;
|
2021-05-11 23:00:21 +02:00
|
|
|
Bool have_egl_stream_flush;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GLint blit_prog;
|
|
|
|
GLuint blit_vao;
|
|
|
|
GLuint blit_vbo;
|
|
|
|
GLuint blit_is_rgba_pos;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-03 23:57:51 +01:00
|
|
|
enum xwl_pixmap_type {
|
|
|
|
XWL_PIXMAP_EGLSTREAM, /* Pixmaps created by glamor. */
|
|
|
|
XWL_PIXMAP_DMA_BUF, /* Pixmaps allocated through DRI3. */
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
struct xwl_pixmap {
|
2020-12-03 23:57:51 +01:00
|
|
|
enum xwl_pixmap_type type;
|
|
|
|
/* add any new <= 4-byte member here to avoid holes on 64-bit */
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen;
|
2020-12-03 23:57:51 +01:00
|
|
|
struct wl_buffer *buffer;
|
2021-04-30 09:56:05 +02:00
|
|
|
struct wl_callback *pending_cb;
|
2021-05-04 10:56:38 +02:00
|
|
|
Bool wait_for_buffer_release;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-12-03 23:57:51 +01:00
|
|
|
/* XWL_PIXMAP_EGLSTREAM. */
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
EGLStreamKHR stream;
|
|
|
|
EGLSurface surface;
|
2020-12-03 23:57:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* XWL_PIXMAP_DMA_BUF. */
|
|
|
|
EGLImage image;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static DevPrivateKeyRec xwl_eglstream_private_key;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline struct xwl_eglstream_private *
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_get(struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return dixLookupPrivate(&xwl_screen->screen->devPrivates,
|
|
|
|
&xwl_eglstream_private_key);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static GLint
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_compile_glsl_prog(GLenum type, const char *source)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GLint ok;
|
|
|
|
GLint prog;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prog = glCreateShader(type);
|
|
|
|
glShaderSource(prog, 1, (const GLchar **) &source, NULL);
|
|
|
|
glCompileShader(prog);
|
|
|
|
glGetShaderiv(prog, GL_COMPILE_STATUS, &ok);
|
|
|
|
if (!ok) {
|
|
|
|
GLchar *info;
|
|
|
|
GLint size;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
glGetShaderiv(prog, GL_INFO_LOG_LENGTH, &size);
|
|
|
|
info = malloc(size);
|
|
|
|
if (info) {
|
|
|
|
glGetShaderInfoLog(prog, size, NULL, info);
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("Failed to compile %s: %s\n",
|
|
|
|
type == GL_FRAGMENT_SHADER ? "FS" : "VS", info);
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("Program source:\n%s", source);
|
|
|
|
free(info);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("Failed to get shader compilation info.\n");
|
|
|
|
FatalError("GLSL compile failure\n");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return prog;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static GLuint
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_build_glsl_prog(GLuint vs, GLuint fs)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GLint ok;
|
|
|
|
GLuint prog;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prog = glCreateProgram();
|
|
|
|
glAttachShader(prog, vs);
|
|
|
|
glAttachShader(prog, fs);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
glLinkProgram(prog);
|
|
|
|
glGetProgramiv(prog, GL_LINK_STATUS, &ok);
|
|
|
|
if (!ok) {
|
|
|
|
GLchar *info;
|
|
|
|
GLint size;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
glGetProgramiv(prog, GL_INFO_LOG_LENGTH, &size);
|
|
|
|
info = malloc(size);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
glGetProgramInfoLog(prog, size, NULL, info);
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("Failed to link: %s\n", info);
|
|
|
|
FatalError("GLSL link failure\n");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return prog;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_cleanup(struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_eglstream_private *xwl_eglstream =
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_get(xwl_screen);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_eglstream->display)
|
|
|
|
wl_eglstream_display_destroy(xwl_eglstream->display);
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_eglstream->controller)
|
|
|
|
wl_eglstream_controller_destroy(xwl_eglstream->controller);
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_eglstream->blit_prog) {
|
|
|
|
glDeleteProgram(xwl_eglstream->blit_prog);
|
|
|
|
glDeleteBuffers(1, &xwl_eglstream->blit_vbo);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
free(xwl_eglstream);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-05 19:38:36 +02:00
|
|
|
static Bool
|
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_egl_supports_device_probing(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return epoxy_has_egl_extension(NULL, "EGL_EXT_device_base");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void **
|
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_egl_get_devices(int *num_devices)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-16 02:37:16 +02:00
|
|
|
EGLDeviceEXT *devices, *tmp;
|
2018-06-05 19:38:36 +02:00
|
|
|
Bool ret;
|
|
|
|
int drm_dev_count = 0;
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!xwl_glamor_egl_supports_device_probing())
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Get the number of devices */
|
|
|
|
ret = eglQueryDevicesEXT(0, NULL, num_devices);
|
|
|
|
if (!ret || *num_devices < 1)
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
devices = calloc(*num_devices, sizeof(EGLDeviceEXT));
|
|
|
|
if (!devices)
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ret = eglQueryDevicesEXT(*num_devices, devices, num_devices);
|
|
|
|
if (!ret)
|
|
|
|
goto error;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* We're only ever going to care about devices that support
|
|
|
|
* EGL_EXT_device_drm, so filter out the ones that don't
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < *num_devices; i++) {
|
|
|
|
const char *extension_str =
|
|
|
|
eglQueryDeviceStringEXT(devices[i], EGL_EXTENSIONS);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!epoxy_extension_in_string(extension_str, "EGL_EXT_device_drm"))
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
devices[drm_dev_count++] = devices[i];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!drm_dev_count)
|
|
|
|
goto error;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*num_devices = drm_dev_count;
|
2018-10-16 02:37:16 +02:00
|
|
|
tmp = realloc(devices, sizeof(EGLDeviceEXT) * drm_dev_count);
|
|
|
|
if (!tmp)
|
|
|
|
goto error;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
devices = tmp;
|
2018-06-05 19:38:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return devices;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
error:
|
|
|
|
free(devices);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static Bool
|
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_egl_device_has_egl_extensions(void *device,
|
|
|
|
const char **ext_list, size_t size)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
EGLDisplay egl_display;
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
Bool has_exts = TRUE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
egl_display = glamor_egl_get_display(EGL_PLATFORM_DEVICE_EXT, device);
|
|
|
|
if (!egl_display || !eglInitialize(egl_display, NULL, NULL))
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
|
|
|
|
if (!epoxy_has_egl_extension(egl_display, ext_list[i])) {
|
|
|
|
has_exts = FALSE;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eglTerminate(egl_display);
|
|
|
|
return has_exts;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
static void
|
2021-04-15 10:59:36 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_destroy_pixmap_stream(struct xwl_pixmap *xwl_pixmap)
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen = xwl_pixmap->xwl_screen;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* If we're using this stream in the current egl context, unbind it so the
|
|
|
|
* driver doesn't keep it around until the next eglMakeCurrent()
|
|
|
|
* don't have to keep it around until something else changes the surface
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_egl_make_current(xwl_screen);
|
|
|
|
if (eglGetCurrentSurface(EGL_READ) == xwl_pixmap->surface ||
|
|
|
|
eglGetCurrentSurface(EGL_DRAW) == xwl_pixmap->surface) {
|
|
|
|
eglMakeCurrent(xwl_screen->egl_display,
|
|
|
|
EGL_NO_SURFACE, EGL_NO_SURFACE,
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen->egl_context);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-03 23:57:51 +01:00
|
|
|
if (xwl_pixmap->surface != EGL_NO_SURFACE)
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
eglDestroySurface(xwl_screen->egl_display, xwl_pixmap->surface);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-03 23:57:51 +01:00
|
|
|
if (xwl_pixmap->stream != EGL_NO_STREAM_KHR)
|
|
|
|
eglDestroyStreamKHR(xwl_screen->egl_display, xwl_pixmap->stream);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_pixmap->buffer)
|
|
|
|
wl_buffer_destroy(xwl_pixmap->buffer);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_pixmap->image != EGL_NO_IMAGE_KHR)
|
|
|
|
eglDestroyImageKHR(xwl_screen->egl_display, xwl_pixmap->image);
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
free(xwl_pixmap);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-15 10:59:36 +02:00
|
|
|
static void
|
2021-07-02 12:57:21 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_destroy_pending_cb(PixmapPtr pixmap)
|
2020-11-02 10:24:45 +01:00
|
|
|
{
|
2021-07-02 12:57:21 +02:00
|
|
|
struct xwl_pixmap *xwl_pixmap = xwl_pixmap_get(pixmap);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_pixmap && xwl_pixmap->pending_cb) {
|
2021-04-30 09:56:05 +02:00
|
|
|
wl_callback_destroy(xwl_pixmap->pending_cb);
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->pending_cb = NULL;
|
2020-11-02 10:24:45 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
static Bool
|
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_eglstream_destroy_pixmap(PixmapPtr pixmap)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_pixmap *xwl_pixmap = xwl_pixmap_get(pixmap);
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-30 13:17:34 +01:00
|
|
|
if (xwl_pixmap && pixmap->refcnt == 1) {
|
2021-07-02 12:57:21 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_destroy_pending_cb(pixmap);
|
2021-04-15 10:59:36 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_destroy_pixmap_stream(xwl_pixmap);
|
2019-10-30 13:17:34 +01:00
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap_del_buffer_release_cb(pixmap);
|
|
|
|
}
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
return glamor_destroy_pixmap(pixmap);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct wl_buffer *
|
2021-01-07 16:00:33 +01:00
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_eglstream_get_wl_buffer_for_pixmap(PixmapPtr pixmap)
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2021-05-18 17:56:50 +02:00
|
|
|
struct xwl_pixmap *xwl_pixmap = xwl_pixmap_get(pixmap);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!xwl_pixmap)
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return xwl_pixmap->buffer;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-01 08:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
static const char *
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_get_error_str(EGLint error)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
switch (error) {
|
|
|
|
case EGL_BAD_PARAMETER:
|
|
|
|
return "EGL_BAD_PARAMETER";
|
|
|
|
case EGL_BAD_ATTRIBUTE:
|
|
|
|
return "EGL_BAD_ATTRIBUTE";
|
|
|
|
case EGL_BAD_MATCH:
|
|
|
|
return "EGL_BAD_MATCH";
|
|
|
|
case EGL_BAD_ACCESS:
|
|
|
|
return "EGL_BAD_ACCESS";
|
|
|
|
case EGL_BAD_STATE_KHR:
|
|
|
|
return "EGL_BAD_STATE_KHR";
|
|
|
|
case EGL_BAD_STREAM_KHR:
|
|
|
|
return "EGL_BAD_STREAM_KHR";
|
|
|
|
case EGL_BAD_DISPLAY:
|
|
|
|
return "EGL_BAD_DISPLAY";
|
|
|
|
case EGL_NOT_INITIALIZED:
|
|
|
|
return "EGL_NOT_INITIALIZED";
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
return "Unknown error";
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const char *
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_get_stream_state_str(EGLint state)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
switch (state) {
|
|
|
|
case EGL_STREAM_STATE_CREATED_KHR:
|
|
|
|
return "EGL_STREAM_STATE_CREATED_KHR";
|
|
|
|
case EGL_STREAM_STATE_CONNECTING_KHR:
|
|
|
|
return "EGL_STREAM_STATE_CONNECTING_KHR";
|
|
|
|
case EGL_STREAM_STATE_EMPTY_KHR:
|
|
|
|
return "EGL_STREAM_STATE_EMPTY_KHR";
|
|
|
|
case EGL_STREAM_STATE_NEW_FRAME_AVAILABLE_KHR:
|
|
|
|
return "EGL_STREAM_STATE_NEW_FRAME_AVAILABLE_KHR";
|
|
|
|
case EGL_STREAM_STATE_OLD_FRAME_AVAILABLE_KHR:
|
|
|
|
return "EGL_STREAM_STATE_OLD_FRAME_AVAILABLE_KHR";
|
|
|
|
case EGL_STREAM_STATE_DISCONNECTED_KHR:
|
|
|
|
return "EGL_STREAM_STATE_DISCONNECTED_KHR";
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
return "Unknown state";
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static EGLint
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_get_state(EGLDisplay egl_display, EGLStreamKHR egl_stream)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
EGLint state;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eglQueryStreamKHR(egl_display, egl_stream, EGL_STREAM_STATE_KHR, &state);
|
|
|
|
if (!eglQueryStreamKHR(egl_display, egl_stream,
|
|
|
|
EGL_STREAM_STATE_KHR, &state)) {
|
|
|
|
EGLint state_error = eglGetError();
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("eglstream: Failed to query state - error 0x%X: %s\n",
|
|
|
|
state_error, xwl_eglstream_get_error_str(state_error));
|
|
|
|
return EGL_FALSE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return state;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_print_error(EGLDisplay egl_display,
|
|
|
|
EGLStreamKHR egl_stream, EGLint error)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("eglstream: error 0x%X: %s\n", error,
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_get_error_str(error));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (error == EGL_BAD_STATE_KHR) {
|
|
|
|
EGLint state = xwl_eglstream_get_state(egl_display, egl_stream);
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("eglstream: stream state 0x%X: %s\n", state,
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_get_stream_state_str(state));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_consumer_ready_callback(void *data,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_callback *callback,
|
|
|
|
uint32_t time)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-04-30 09:56:05 +02:00
|
|
|
PixmapPtr pixmap = data;
|
2021-04-27 14:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
struct xwl_pixmap *xwl_pixmap = xwl_pixmap_get(pixmap);
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen = xwl_pixmap->xwl_screen;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
struct xwl_eglstream_private *xwl_eglstream =
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_get(xwl_screen);
|
|
|
|
|
2021-07-02 12:57:21 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_destroy_pending_cb(pixmap);
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_egl_make_current(xwl_screen);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->surface = eglCreateStreamProducerSurfaceKHR(
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen->egl_display, xwl_eglstream->config,
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->stream, (int[]) {
|
xwayland/eglstream: Dissociate pending stream from window
Previously, we would have pending streams associated with top level X11
windows, keeping temporary accounting for the pending streams before
they get fully initialized for the xwl_pixmap which would be associated
with X11 pixmaps.
If the window content changes before the stream is ready, the
corresponding pending stream would be marked as invalid and the pending
stream would be eventually removed once the stream becomes ready.
Since commit affc47452 - "xwayland: Drop the separate refcount for the
xwl_pixmap", we no longer keep a separate reference counter for the
xwl_pixmap, but rather tie it to the X11 pixmap lifespan. Yet, the
pending stream would still be associated with the X11 toplevel window.
Dissociate the pending streams from the X11 toplevel window, to keep it
tied only to the xwl_pixmap so that we can have:
- pixmap <-> xwl_pixmap
- xwl_pixmap <-> pending stream
Of course, the pending streams remain temporary and get removed as soon
as the ready callback is triggered, but the pending streams are not
linked to the X11 window anymore which can change their content, and
therefore their X11 pixmap at any time.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1156
2021-04-16 10:38:23 +02:00
|
|
|
EGL_WIDTH, pixmap->drawable.width,
|
|
|
|
EGL_HEIGHT, pixmap->drawable.height,
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
EGL_NONE
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-01 08:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
if (xwl_pixmap->surface == EGL_NO_SURFACE) {
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("eglstream: Failed to create EGLSurface for pixmap\n");
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_print_error(xwl_screen->egl_display,
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->stream, eglGetError());
|
2021-04-30 09:56:05 +02:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
DebugF("eglstream: completes eglstream for pixmap %p, congrats!\n",
|
|
|
|
pixmap);
|
2021-04-01 08:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const struct wl_callback_listener consumer_ready_listener = {
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_consumer_ready_callback
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
2020-09-22 09:54:15 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_buffer_release_callback(void *data)
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2021-05-04 10:56:38 +02:00
|
|
|
PixmapPtr pixmap = data;
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_pixmap *xwl_pixmap = xwl_pixmap_get(pixmap);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(xwl_pixmap);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_pixmap->wait_for_buffer_release) {
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->wait_for_buffer_release = FALSE;
|
|
|
|
/* drop the reference we took in the ready callback, freeing if necessary */
|
|
|
|
dixDestroyPixmap(pixmap, 0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const struct wl_buffer_listener xwl_eglstream_buffer_release_listener = {
|
2020-09-22 09:54:15 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap_buffer_release_cb,
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
2021-04-15 10:59:36 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_create_pixmap_and_stream(struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen,
|
|
|
|
WindowPtr window, PixmapPtr pixmap)
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_eglstream_private *xwl_eglstream =
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_get(xwl_screen);
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_pixmap *xwl_pixmap;
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_window *xwl_window = xwl_window_from_window(window);
|
|
|
|
struct wl_array stream_attribs;
|
|
|
|
int stream_fd = -1;
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-19 14:52:38 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap = calloc(1, sizeof(*xwl_pixmap));
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
if (!xwl_pixmap)
|
|
|
|
FatalError("Not enough memory to create pixmap\n");
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap_set_private(pixmap, xwl_pixmap);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-03 23:57:51 +01:00
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->type = XWL_PIXMAP_EGLSTREAM;
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->image = EGL_NO_IMAGE;
|
|
|
|
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_egl_make_current(xwl_screen);
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 10:56:38 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->wait_for_buffer_release = FALSE;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->xwl_screen = xwl_screen;
|
2020-12-03 23:57:51 +01:00
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->surface = EGL_NO_SURFACE;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->stream = eglCreateStreamKHR(xwl_screen->egl_display, NULL);
|
2021-04-01 08:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
if (xwl_pixmap->stream == EGL_NO_STREAM_KHR) {
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("eglstream: Couldn't create EGL stream.\n");
|
|
|
|
goto fail;
|
|
|
|
}
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
stream_fd = eglGetStreamFileDescriptorKHR(xwl_screen->egl_display,
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->stream);
|
2021-04-01 08:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
if (stream_fd == EGL_NO_FILE_DESCRIPTOR_KHR) {
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("eglstream: Couldn't get EGL stream file descriptor.\n");
|
|
|
|
goto fail;
|
|
|
|
}
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wl_array_init(&stream_attribs);
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->buffer =
|
|
|
|
wl_eglstream_display_create_stream(xwl_eglstream->display,
|
|
|
|
pixmap->drawable.width,
|
|
|
|
pixmap->drawable.height,
|
|
|
|
stream_fd,
|
|
|
|
WL_EGLSTREAM_HANDLE_TYPE_FD,
|
|
|
|
&stream_attribs);
|
2021-03-29 14:22:56 +02:00
|
|
|
if (!xwl_pixmap->buffer) {
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("eglstream: Failed to create buffer\n");
|
|
|
|
goto fail;
|
|
|
|
}
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wl_buffer_add_listener(xwl_pixmap->buffer,
|
|
|
|
&xwl_eglstream_buffer_release_listener,
|
2019-10-30 13:17:34 +01:00
|
|
|
pixmap);
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-22 09:54:15 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap_set_buffer_release_cb(pixmap,
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_buffer_release_callback,
|
|
|
|
pixmap);
|
|
|
|
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
wl_eglstream_controller_attach_eglstream_consumer(
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream->controller, xwl_window->surface, xwl_pixmap->buffer);
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-30 09:56:05 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->pending_cb = wl_display_sync(xwl_screen->display);
|
|
|
|
wl_callback_add_listener(xwl_pixmap->pending_cb, &consumer_ready_listener,
|
|
|
|
pixmap);
|
2021-03-29 14:22:56 +02:00
|
|
|
fail:
|
|
|
|
if (stream_fd >= 0)
|
|
|
|
close(stream_fd);
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static Bool
|
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_eglstream_allow_commits(struct xwl_window *xwl_window)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen = xwl_window->xwl_screen;
|
|
|
|
PixmapPtr pixmap =
|
|
|
|
(*xwl_screen->screen->GetWindowPixmap)(xwl_window->window);
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_pixmap *xwl_pixmap = xwl_pixmap_get(pixmap);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_pixmap) {
|
2021-04-30 09:56:05 +02:00
|
|
|
if (xwl_pixmap->pending_cb) {
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
/* Wait for the compositor to finish connecting the consumer for
|
|
|
|
* this eglstream */
|
xwayland/eglstream: Dissociate pending stream from window
Previously, we would have pending streams associated with top level X11
windows, keeping temporary accounting for the pending streams before
they get fully initialized for the xwl_pixmap which would be associated
with X11 pixmaps.
If the window content changes before the stream is ready, the
corresponding pending stream would be marked as invalid and the pending
stream would be eventually removed once the stream becomes ready.
Since commit affc47452 - "xwayland: Drop the separate refcount for the
xwl_pixmap", we no longer keep a separate reference counter for the
xwl_pixmap, but rather tie it to the X11 pixmap lifespan. Yet, the
pending stream would still be associated with the X11 toplevel window.
Dissociate the pending streams from the X11 toplevel window, to keep it
tied only to the xwl_pixmap so that we can have:
- pixmap <-> xwl_pixmap
- xwl_pixmap <-> pending stream
Of course, the pending streams remain temporary and get removed as soon
as the ready callback is triggered, but the pending streams are not
linked to the X11 window anymore which can change their content, and
therefore their X11 pixmap at any time.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1156
2021-04-16 10:38:23 +02:00
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-04-30 09:56:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_pixmap->surface != EGL_NO_SURFACE ||
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->type == XWL_PIXMAP_DMA_BUF) {
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* The pending stream got removed, we have a xwl_pixmap and
|
|
|
|
* yet we do not have a surface.
|
|
|
|
* So something went wrong with the surface creation, retry.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_destroy_pixmap_stream(xwl_pixmap);
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Glamor pixmap has no backing stream yet; begin making one and disallow
|
|
|
|
* commits until then
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2021-04-15 10:59:36 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_create_pixmap_and_stream(xwl_screen, xwl_window->window,
|
|
|
|
pixmap);
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-31 13:57:45 +02:00
|
|
|
static Bool
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_eglstream_post_damage(struct xwl_window *xwl_window,
|
|
|
|
PixmapPtr pixmap, RegionPtr region)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen = xwl_window->xwl_screen;
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_eglstream_private *xwl_eglstream =
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_get(xwl_screen);
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_pixmap *xwl_pixmap = xwl_pixmap_get(pixmap);
|
|
|
|
BoxPtr box = RegionExtents(region);
|
|
|
|
EGLint egl_damage[] = {
|
|
|
|
box->x1, box->y1,
|
|
|
|
box->x2 - box->x1, box->y2 - box->y1
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
GLint saved_vao;
|
2021-03-31 09:49:35 +02:00
|
|
|
int status;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-27 13:23:44 +02:00
|
|
|
if (xwl_pixmap->type != XWL_PIXMAP_EGLSTREAM)
|
|
|
|
/* This can happen if a client does X11 rendering on a
|
|
|
|
* flipping OpenGL or Vulkan window. In that case, we don't
|
|
|
|
* need to do the copy below.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2021-03-31 13:57:45 +02:00
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
2020-12-03 23:57:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
/* Unbind the framebuffer BEFORE binding the EGLSurface, otherwise we
|
|
|
|
* won't actually draw to it
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_egl_make_current(xwl_screen);
|
2021-04-30 16:23:10 +02:00
|
|
|
glamor_set_alu(xwl_screen->screen, GXcopy);
|
|
|
|
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
glBindFramebuffer(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (eglGetCurrentSurface(EGL_READ) != xwl_pixmap->surface ||
|
|
|
|
eglGetCurrentSurface(EGL_DRAW) != xwl_pixmap->surface)
|
|
|
|
eglMakeCurrent(xwl_screen->egl_display,
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->surface, xwl_pixmap->surface,
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen->egl_context);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Save current GL state */
|
|
|
|
glGetIntegerv(GL_VERTEX_ARRAY_BINDING, &saved_vao);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Setup our GL state */
|
|
|
|
glUseProgram(xwl_eglstream->blit_prog);
|
|
|
|
glViewport(0, 0, pixmap->drawable.width, pixmap->drawable.height);
|
|
|
|
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0);
|
|
|
|
glBindVertexArray(xwl_eglstream->blit_vao);
|
|
|
|
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, glamor_get_pixmap_texture(pixmap));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
glUniform1i(xwl_eglstream->blit_is_rgba_pos,
|
|
|
|
pixmap->drawable.depth >= 32);
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-31 09:49:35 +02:00
|
|
|
status = glCheckFramebufferStatus(GL_FRAMEBUFFER);
|
|
|
|
if (status != GL_FRAMEBUFFER_COMPLETE) {
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("eglstream: Framebuffer incomplete 0x%X, not posting damage\n", status);
|
|
|
|
status = FALSE;
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
/* Blit rendered image into EGLStream surface */
|
|
|
|
glDrawBuffer(GL_BACK);
|
|
|
|
glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLE_FAN, 0, 4);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_eglstream->have_egl_damage)
|
2021-04-30 09:02:29 +02:00
|
|
|
status = eglSwapBuffersWithDamageKHR(xwl_screen->egl_display,
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->surface,
|
|
|
|
egl_damage, 1);
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
else
|
2021-04-30 09:02:29 +02:00
|
|
|
status = eglSwapBuffers(xwl_screen->egl_display,
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->surface);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!status) {
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("eglstream: buffer swap failed, not posting damage\n");
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-11 23:00:21 +02:00
|
|
|
#ifdef EGL_NV_stream_flush
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_eglstream->have_egl_stream_flush)
|
|
|
|
/* block until stream state is updated on the compositor's side */
|
|
|
|
eglStreamFlushNV(xwl_screen->egl_display,
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->stream);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 10:56:38 +02:00
|
|
|
if (!xwl_pixmap->wait_for_buffer_release) {
|
|
|
|
/* hang onto the pixmap until the compositor has released it */
|
|
|
|
pixmap->refcnt++;
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->wait_for_buffer_release = TRUE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-03-31 09:49:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
out:
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
/* Restore previous state */
|
|
|
|
glBindVertexArray(saved_vao);
|
|
|
|
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-31 09:49:35 +02:00
|
|
|
return status;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-03 11:56:41 +01:00
|
|
|
static Bool
|
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_eglstream_check_flip(PixmapPtr pixmap)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-12-03 23:57:51 +01:00
|
|
|
return xwl_pixmap_get(pixmap)->type == XWL_PIXMAP_DMA_BUF;
|
2021-03-03 11:56:41 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_display_handle_caps(void *data,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_eglstream_display *disp,
|
|
|
|
int32_t caps)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_get(data)->display_caps = caps;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_display_handle_swapinterval_override(void *data,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_eglstream_display *disp,
|
|
|
|
int32_t swapinterval,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_buffer *stream)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const struct wl_eglstream_display_listener eglstream_display_listener = {
|
|
|
|
.caps = xwl_eglstream_display_handle_caps,
|
|
|
|
.swapinterval_override = xwl_eglstream_display_handle_swapinterval_override,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-05 19:38:43 +02:00
|
|
|
static Bool
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_eglstream_init_wl_registry(struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_registry *wl_registry,
|
2018-06-05 19:38:37 +02:00
|
|
|
uint32_t id, const char *name,
|
|
|
|
uint32_t version)
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_eglstream_private *xwl_eglstream =
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_get(xwl_screen);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (strcmp(name, "wl_eglstream_display") == 0) {
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream->display = wl_registry_bind(
|
|
|
|
wl_registry, id, &wl_eglstream_display_interface, version);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wl_eglstream_display_add_listener(xwl_eglstream->display,
|
|
|
|
&eglstream_display_listener,
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen);
|
2018-06-05 19:38:43 +02:00
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
} else if (strcmp(name, "wl_eglstream_controller") == 0) {
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream->controller = wl_registry_bind(
|
|
|
|
wl_registry, id, &wl_eglstream_controller_interface, version);
|
2018-06-05 19:38:43 +02:00
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
2020-12-03 23:57:51 +01:00
|
|
|
} else if (strcmp(name, "zwp_linux_dmabuf_v1") == 0) {
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen_set_dmabuf_interface(xwl_screen, id, version);
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-06-05 19:38:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* no match */
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-05 19:38:41 +02:00
|
|
|
static Bool
|
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_eglstream_has_wl_interfaces(struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_eglstream_private *xwl_eglstream =
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_get(xwl_screen);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_eglstream->display == NULL) {
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("glamor: 'wl_eglstream_display' not supported\n");
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_eglstream->controller == NULL) {
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("glamor: 'wl_eglstream_controller' not supported\n");
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
static inline void
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_init_shaders(struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_eglstream_private *xwl_eglstream =
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_get(xwl_screen);
|
|
|
|
GLint fs, vs, attrib;
|
|
|
|
GLuint vbo;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const char *blit_vs_src =
|
|
|
|
"attribute vec2 texcoord;\n"
|
|
|
|
"attribute vec2 position;\n"
|
|
|
|
"varying vec2 t;\n"
|
|
|
|
"void main() {\n"
|
|
|
|
" t = texcoord;\n"
|
|
|
|
" gl_Position = vec4(position, 0, 1);\n"
|
|
|
|
"}";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const char *blit_fs_src =
|
|
|
|
"varying vec2 t;\n"
|
|
|
|
"uniform sampler2D s;\n"
|
|
|
|
"uniform bool is_rgba;\n"
|
|
|
|
"void main() {\n"
|
|
|
|
" if (is_rgba)\n"
|
|
|
|
" gl_FragColor = texture2D(s, t);\n"
|
|
|
|
" else\n"
|
|
|
|
" gl_FragColor = vec4(texture2D(s, t).rgb, 1.0);\n"
|
|
|
|
"}";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const float position[] = {
|
|
|
|
/* position */
|
|
|
|
-1, -1,
|
|
|
|
1, -1,
|
|
|
|
1, 1,
|
|
|
|
-1, 1,
|
|
|
|
/* texcoord */
|
|
|
|
0, 1,
|
|
|
|
1, 1,
|
|
|
|
1, 0,
|
|
|
|
0, 0,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs = xwl_eglstream_compile_glsl_prog(GL_VERTEX_SHADER, blit_vs_src);
|
|
|
|
fs = xwl_eglstream_compile_glsl_prog(GL_FRAGMENT_SHADER, blit_fs_src);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream->blit_prog = xwl_eglstream_build_glsl_prog(vs, fs);
|
|
|
|
glDeleteShader(vs);
|
|
|
|
glDeleteShader(fs);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Create the blitter's vao */
|
|
|
|
glGenVertexArrays(1, &xwl_eglstream->blit_vao);
|
|
|
|
glBindVertexArray(xwl_eglstream->blit_vao);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Set the data for both position and texcoord in the vbo */
|
|
|
|
glGenBuffers(1, &vbo);
|
|
|
|
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vbo);
|
|
|
|
glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(position), position, GL_STATIC_DRAW);
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream->blit_vbo = vbo;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Define each shader attribute's data location in our vbo */
|
|
|
|
attrib = glGetAttribLocation(xwl_eglstream->blit_prog, "position");
|
|
|
|
glVertexAttribPointer(attrib, 2, GL_FLOAT, TRUE, 0, NULL);
|
|
|
|
glEnableVertexAttribArray(attrib);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attrib = glGetAttribLocation(xwl_eglstream->blit_prog, "texcoord");
|
|
|
|
glVertexAttribPointer(attrib, 2, GL_FLOAT, TRUE, 0,
|
|
|
|
(void*)(sizeof(float) * 8));
|
|
|
|
glEnableVertexAttribArray(attrib);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Save the location of uniforms we'll set later */
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream->blit_is_rgba_pos =
|
|
|
|
glGetUniformLocation(xwl_eglstream->blit_prog, "is_rgba");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-03 23:57:51 +01:00
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
xwl_dri3_open_client(ClientPtr client,
|
|
|
|
ScreenPtr screen,
|
|
|
|
RRProviderPtr provider,
|
|
|
|
int *pfd)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* Not supported with this backend. */
|
|
|
|
return BadImplementation;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static PixmapPtr
|
|
|
|
xwl_dri3_pixmap_from_fds(ScreenPtr screen,
|
|
|
|
CARD8 num_fds, const int *fds,
|
|
|
|
CARD16 width, CARD16 height,
|
|
|
|
const CARD32 *strides, const CARD32 *offsets,
|
|
|
|
CARD8 depth, CARD8 bpp,
|
|
|
|
uint64_t modifier)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PixmapPtr pixmap;
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen = xwl_screen_get(screen);
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_pixmap *xwl_pixmap;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int texture;
|
|
|
|
EGLint image_attribs[48];
|
|
|
|
uint32_t mod_hi = modifier >> 32, mod_lo = modifier & 0xffffffff, format;
|
|
|
|
int attrib = 0, i;
|
|
|
|
struct zwp_linux_buffer_params_v1 *params;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
format = wl_drm_format_for_depth(depth);
|
|
|
|
if (!xwl_glamor_is_modifier_supported(xwl_screen, format, modifier)) {
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("glamor: unsupported format modifier\n");
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap = calloc(1, sizeof (*xwl_pixmap));
|
|
|
|
if (!xwl_pixmap)
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->type = XWL_PIXMAP_DMA_BUF;
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->xwl_screen = xwl_screen;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->buffer = NULL;
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->stream = EGL_NO_STREAM_KHR;
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->surface = EGL_NO_SURFACE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
params = zwp_linux_dmabuf_v1_create_params(xwl_screen->dmabuf);
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < num_fds; i++) {
|
|
|
|
zwp_linux_buffer_params_v1_add(params, fds[i], i,
|
|
|
|
offsets[i], strides[i],
|
|
|
|
mod_hi, mod_lo);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->buffer =
|
|
|
|
zwp_linux_buffer_params_v1_create_immed(params, width, height,
|
|
|
|
format, 0);
|
|
|
|
zwp_linux_buffer_params_v1_destroy(params);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_WIDTH;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = width;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_HEIGHT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = height;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_LINUX_DRM_FOURCC_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = drm_format_for_depth(depth, bpp);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (num_fds > 0) {
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE0_FD_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = fds[0];
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE0_OFFSET_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = offsets[0];
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE0_PITCH_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = strides[0];
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE0_MODIFIER_HI_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = mod_hi;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE0_MODIFIER_LO_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = mod_lo;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (num_fds > 1) {
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE1_FD_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = fds[1];
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE1_OFFSET_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = offsets[1];
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE1_PITCH_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = strides[1];
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE1_MODIFIER_HI_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = mod_hi;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE1_MODIFIER_LO_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = mod_lo;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (num_fds > 2) {
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE2_FD_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = fds[2];
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE2_OFFSET_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = offsets[2];
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE2_PITCH_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = strides[2];
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE2_MODIFIER_HI_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = mod_hi;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE2_MODIFIER_LO_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = mod_lo;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (num_fds > 3) {
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE3_FD_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = fds[3];
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE3_OFFSET_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = offsets[3];
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE3_PITCH_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = strides[3];
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE3_MODIFIER_HI_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = mod_hi;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_DMA_BUF_PLANE3_MODIFIER_LO_EXT;
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = mod_lo;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
image_attribs[attrib++] = EGL_NONE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_egl_make_current(xwl_screen);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* eglCreateImageKHR will close fds */
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap->image = eglCreateImageKHR(xwl_screen->egl_display,
|
|
|
|
EGL_NO_CONTEXT,
|
|
|
|
EGL_LINUX_DMA_BUF_EXT,
|
|
|
|
NULL, image_attribs);
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_pixmap->image == EGL_NO_IMAGE_KHR) {
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("eglCreateImageKHR failed!\n");
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_pixmap->buffer)
|
|
|
|
wl_buffer_destroy(xwl_pixmap->buffer);
|
|
|
|
free(xwl_pixmap);
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
glGenTextures(1, &texture);
|
|
|
|
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture);
|
|
|
|
glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_NEAREST);
|
|
|
|
glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_NEAREST);
|
|
|
|
glEGLImageTargetTexture2DOES(GL_TEXTURE_2D, xwl_pixmap->image);
|
|
|
|
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pixmap = glamor_create_pixmap(screen, width, height, depth,
|
|
|
|
GLAMOR_CREATE_PIXMAP_NO_TEXTURE);
|
|
|
|
glamor_set_pixmap_texture(pixmap, texture);
|
|
|
|
glamor_set_pixmap_type(pixmap, GLAMOR_TEXTURE_DRM);
|
|
|
|
wl_buffer_add_listener(xwl_pixmap->buffer,
|
|
|
|
&xwl_eglstream_buffer_release_listener,
|
|
|
|
pixmap);
|
|
|
|
xwl_pixmap_set_private(pixmap, xwl_pixmap);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return pixmap;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const dri3_screen_info_rec xwl_dri3_info = {
|
|
|
|
.version = 2,
|
|
|
|
.open = NULL,
|
|
|
|
.pixmap_from_fds = xwl_dri3_pixmap_from_fds,
|
|
|
|
.fds_from_pixmap = NULL,
|
|
|
|
.open_client = xwl_dri3_open_client,
|
|
|
|
.get_formats = xwl_glamor_get_formats,
|
|
|
|
.get_modifiers = xwl_glamor_get_modifiers,
|
|
|
|
.get_drawable_modifiers = glamor_get_drawable_modifiers,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
static Bool
|
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_eglstream_init_egl(struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_eglstream_private *xwl_eglstream =
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_get(xwl_screen);
|
|
|
|
EGLConfig config;
|
|
|
|
const EGLint attrib_list[] = {
|
|
|
|
EGL_CONTEXT_OPENGL_PROFILE_MASK_KHR,
|
|
|
|
EGL_CONTEXT_OPENGL_CORE_PROFILE_BIT_KHR,
|
|
|
|
EGL_CONTEXT_MAJOR_VERSION_KHR,
|
|
|
|
GLAMOR_GL_CORE_VER_MAJOR,
|
|
|
|
EGL_CONTEXT_MINOR_VERSION_KHR,
|
|
|
|
GLAMOR_GL_CORE_VER_MINOR,
|
|
|
|
EGL_CONTEXT_PRIORITY_LEVEL_IMG, EGL_CONTEXT_PRIORITY_HIGH_IMG,
|
|
|
|
EGL_NONE
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const EGLint config_attribs[] = {
|
|
|
|
EGL_SURFACE_TYPE, EGL_STREAM_BIT_KHR,
|
|
|
|
EGL_RENDERABLE_TYPE, EGL_OPENGL_BIT,
|
|
|
|
EGL_RED_SIZE, 8,
|
|
|
|
EGL_GREEN_SIZE, 8,
|
|
|
|
EGL_BLUE_SIZE, 8,
|
|
|
|
EGL_ALPHA_SIZE, 8,
|
|
|
|
EGL_NONE,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
int n;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen->egl_display = glamor_egl_get_display(
|
|
|
|
EGL_PLATFORM_DEVICE_EXT, xwl_eglstream->egl_device);
|
|
|
|
if (!xwl_screen->egl_display)
|
|
|
|
goto error;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!eglInitialize(xwl_screen->egl_display, NULL, NULL)) {
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen->egl_display = NULL;
|
|
|
|
goto error;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-05 19:38:45 +02:00
|
|
|
if (!epoxy_has_egl_extension(xwl_screen->egl_display,
|
|
|
|
"EGL_IMG_context_priority")) {
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("EGL_IMG_context_priority not available\n");
|
|
|
|
goto error;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
eglChooseConfig(xwl_screen->egl_display, config_attribs, &config, 1, &n);
|
|
|
|
if (!n) {
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("No acceptable EGL configs found\n");
|
|
|
|
goto error;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream->config = config;
|
|
|
|
#if 0
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen->formats =
|
|
|
|
XWL_FORMAT_RGB565 | XWL_FORMAT_XRGB8888 | XWL_FORMAT_ARGB8888;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eglBindAPI(EGL_OPENGL_API);
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen->egl_context = eglCreateContext(
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen->egl_display, config, EGL_NO_CONTEXT, attrib_list);
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_screen->egl_context == EGL_NO_CONTEXT) {
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("Failed to create main EGL context: 0x%x\n", eglGetError());
|
|
|
|
goto error;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!eglMakeCurrent(xwl_screen->egl_display,
|
|
|
|
EGL_NO_SURFACE, EGL_NO_SURFACE,
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen->egl_context)) {
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("Failed to make EGL context current\n");
|
|
|
|
goto error;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream->have_egl_damage =
|
|
|
|
epoxy_has_egl_extension(xwl_screen->egl_display,
|
|
|
|
"EGL_KHR_swap_buffers_with_damage");
|
|
|
|
if (!xwl_eglstream->have_egl_damage)
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("Driver lacks EGL_KHR_swap_buffers_with_damage, performance "
|
|
|
|
"will be affected\n");
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-11 23:00:21 +02:00
|
|
|
#ifdef EGL_NV_stream_flush
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream->have_egl_stream_flush =
|
|
|
|
epoxy_has_egl_extension(xwl_screen->egl_display,
|
|
|
|
"EGL_NV_stream_flush");
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream->have_egl_stream_flush = FALSE;
|
|
|
|
#endif /* EGL_NV_stream_flush */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!xwl_eglstream->have_egl_stream_flush)
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("EGL_NV_stream_flush not available, "
|
|
|
|
"this may cause visible corruption.\n");
|
|
|
|
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_init_shaders(xwl_screen);
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-17 18:20:57 +02:00
|
|
|
if (epoxy_has_gl_extension("GL_OES_EGL_image")) {
|
|
|
|
if (dri3_screen_init(xwl_screen->screen, &xwl_dri3_info))
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen->glvnd_vendor = "nvidia";
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("DRI3 initialization failed. Performance will be affected.\n");
|
2021-05-20 16:46:33 +02:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("Driver lacks GL_OES_EGL_image, performance will be affected.\n");
|
2020-12-03 23:57:51 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
|
|
|
error:
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_cleanup(xwl_screen);
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static Bool
|
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_eglstream_init_screen(struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ScreenPtr screen = xwl_screen->screen;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* We can just let glamor handle CreatePixmap */
|
|
|
|
screen->DestroyPixmap = xwl_glamor_eglstream_destroy_pixmap;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static EGLDeviceEXT
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream_get_device(struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
void **devices = NULL;
|
|
|
|
const char *exts[] = {
|
|
|
|
"EGL_KHR_stream",
|
|
|
|
"EGL_KHR_stream_producer_eglsurface",
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
int num_devices, i;
|
|
|
|
EGLDeviceEXT device = EGL_NO_DEVICE_EXT;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* No device specified by the user, so find one ourselves */
|
|
|
|
devices = xwl_glamor_egl_get_devices(&num_devices);
|
|
|
|
if (!devices)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < num_devices; i++) {
|
|
|
|
if (xwl_glamor_egl_device_has_egl_extensions(devices[i], exts,
|
|
|
|
ARRAY_SIZE(exts))) {
|
|
|
|
device = devices[i];
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
free(devices);
|
|
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
if (!device)
|
|
|
|
ErrorF("glamor: No eglstream capable devices found\n");
|
|
|
|
return device;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-05 19:38:43 +02:00
|
|
|
void
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_glamor_init_eglstream(struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct xwl_eglstream_private *xwl_eglstream;
|
|
|
|
EGLDeviceEXT egl_device;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-05 19:38:43 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_screen->eglstream_backend.is_available = FALSE;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
egl_device = xwl_eglstream_get_device(xwl_screen);
|
|
|
|
if (egl_device == EGL_NO_DEVICE_EXT)
|
2018-06-05 19:38:43 +02:00
|
|
|
return;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!dixRegisterPrivateKey(&xwl_eglstream_private_key, PRIVATE_SCREEN, 0))
|
2018-06-05 19:38:43 +02:00
|
|
|
return;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-31 09:04:19 +01:00
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream = calloc(1, sizeof(*xwl_eglstream));
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
if (!xwl_eglstream) {
|
2018-06-05 19:38:43 +02:00
|
|
|
ErrorF("Failed to allocate memory required to init EGLStream support\n");
|
|
|
|
return;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dixSetPrivate(&xwl_screen->screen->devPrivates,
|
|
|
|
&xwl_eglstream_private_key, xwl_eglstream);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xwl_eglstream->egl_device = egl_device;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-05 19:38:43 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_screen->eglstream_backend.init_egl = xwl_glamor_eglstream_init_egl;
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen->eglstream_backend.init_wl_registry = xwl_glamor_eglstream_init_wl_registry;
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen->eglstream_backend.has_wl_interfaces = xwl_glamor_eglstream_has_wl_interfaces;
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen->eglstream_backend.init_screen = xwl_glamor_eglstream_init_screen;
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen->eglstream_backend.get_wl_buffer_for_pixmap = xwl_glamor_eglstream_get_wl_buffer_for_pixmap;
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen->eglstream_backend.post_damage = xwl_glamor_eglstream_post_damage;
|
|
|
|
xwl_screen->eglstream_backend.allow_commits = xwl_glamor_eglstream_allow_commits;
|
2021-03-03 11:56:41 +01:00
|
|
|
xwl_screen->eglstream_backend.check_flip = xwl_glamor_eglstream_check_flip;
|
2018-06-05 19:38:43 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_screen->eglstream_backend.is_available = TRUE;
|
2020-09-14 14:26:34 +02:00
|
|
|
xwl_screen->eglstream_backend.backend_flags = XWL_EGL_BACKEND_NO_FLAG;
|
xwayland: Add glamor egl_backend for EGLStreams
This adds initial support for displaying Xwayland applications through
the use of EGLStreams and nvidia's custom wayland protocol by adding
another egl_backend driver. This also adds some additional egl_backend
hooks that are required to make things work properly.
EGLStreams work a lot differently then the traditional way of handling
buffers with wayland. Unfortunately, there are also a LOT of various
pitfalls baked into it's design that need to be explained.
This has a very large and unfortunate implication: direct rendering is,
for the time being at least, impossible to do through EGLStreams. The
main reason being that the EGLStream spec mandates that we lose the
entire color buffer contents with each eglSwapBuffers(), which goes
against X's requirement of not losing data with pixmaps. no way to use
an allocated EGLSurface as the storage for glamor rendering like we do
with GBM, we have to rely on blitting each pixmap to it's respective
EGLSurface producer each frame. In order to pull this off, we add two
different additional egl_backend hooks that GBM opts out of
implementing:
- egl_backend.allow_commits for holding off displaying any EGLStream
backed pixmaps until the point where it's stream is completely
initialized and ready for use
- egl_backend.post_damage for blitting the content of the EGLStream
surface producer before Xwayland actually damages and commits the
wl_surface to the screen.
The other big pitfall here is that using nvidia's wayland-eglstreams
helper library is also not possible for the most part. All of it's API
for creating and destroying streams rely on being able to perform a
roundtrip in order to bring each stream to completion since the wayland
compositor must perform it's job of connecting a consumer to each
EGLstream. Because Xwayland has to potentially handle both responding to
the wayland compositor and it's own X clients, the situation of the
wayland compositor being one of our X clients must be considered. If we
perform a roundtrip with the Wayland compositor, it's possible that the
wayland compositor might currently be connected to us as an X client and
thus hang while both Xwayland and the wayland compositor await responses
from eachother. To avoid this, we work directly with the wayland
protocol and use wl_display_sync() events along with release() events to
set up and destroy EGLStreams asynchronously alongside handling X
clients.
Additionally, since setting up EGLStreams is not an atomic operation we
have to take into consideration the fact that an EGLStream can
potentially be created in response to a window resize, then immediately
deleted due to another pending window resize in the same X client's
pending reqests before Xwayland hits the part of it's event loop where
we read from the wayland compositor. To make this even more painful, we
also have to take into consideration that since EGLStreams are not
atomic that it's possible we could delete wayland resources for an
EGLStream before the compositor even finishes using them and thus run
into errors. So, we use quite a bit of tracking logic to keep EGLStream
objects alive until we know the compositor isn't using them (even if
this means the stream outlives the pixmap it backed).
While the default backend for glamor remains GBM, this patch exists for
users who have had to deal with the reprecussion of their GPU
manufacturers ignoring the advice of upstream and the standardization of
GBM across most major GPU manufacturers. It is not intended to be a
final solution to the GBM debate, but merely a baindaid so our users
don't have to suffer from the consequences of companies avoiding working
upstream. New drivers are strongly encouraged not to use this as a
backend, and use GBM like everyone else. We even spit this out as an
error from Xwayland when using the eglstream backend.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 20:38:05 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|