From 454cb0802eec3c2c2cdbcc17971bced868462b83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maarten Maathuis <madman2003@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:28:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] damage: DamageReportRawRegion should set pDamage->damage

- I found no evidence in the protocol, that it should be differently from all the other modes.
- It seems to have been like this from day 1.
- If anyone has evidence to the contrary, please enlighten me.
---
 miext/damage/damage.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/miext/damage/damage.c b/miext/damage/damage.c
index 80fcddf80..60acdca87 100755
--- a/miext/damage/damage.c
+++ b/miext/damage/damage.c
@@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ damageReportDamage (DamagePtr pDamage, RegionPtr pDamageRegion)
 
     switch (pDamage->damageLevel) {
     case DamageReportRawRegion:
+	REGION_UNION(pScreen, &pDamage->damage, &pDamage->damage,
+			 pDamageRegion);
 	(*pDamage->damageReport) (pDamage, pDamageRegion, pDamage->closure);
 	break;
     case DamageReportDeltaRegion: