Refuse to create tiny modes from EDID detailed timing.
This commit is contained in:
parent
8522044635
commit
5ba4d9eedf
|
@ -107,6 +107,19 @@ DDCModeFromDetailedTiming(int scrnIndex, struct detailed_timings *timing,
|
|||
{
|
||||
DisplayModePtr Mode;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Refuse to create modes that are insufficiently large. 64 is a random
|
||||
* number, maybe the spec says something about what the minimum is. In
|
||||
* particular I see this frequently with _old_ EDID, 1.0 or so, so maybe
|
||||
* our parser is just being too aggresive there.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (timing->h_active < 64 || timing->v_active < 64) {
|
||||
xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex, X_INFO,
|
||||
"%s: Ignoring tiny %dx%d mode\n", __func__,
|
||||
timing->h_active, timing->v_active);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* We don't do stereo */
|
||||
if (timing->stereo) {
|
||||
xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex, X_INFO,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -197,6 +197,19 @@ DDCModeFromDetailedTiming(int scrnIndex, struct detailed_timings *timing,
|
|||
{
|
||||
DisplayModePtr Mode;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Refuse to create modes that are insufficiently large. 64 is a random
|
||||
* number, maybe the spec says something about what the minimum is. In
|
||||
* particular I see this frequently with _old_ EDID, 1.0 or so, so maybe
|
||||
* our parser is just being too aggresive there.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (timing->h_active < 64 || timing->v_active < 64) {
|
||||
xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex, X_INFO,
|
||||
"%s: Ignoring tiny %dx%d mode\n", __func__,
|
||||
timing->h_active, timing->v_active);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* We don't do stereo */
|
||||
if (timing->stereo) {
|
||||
xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex, X_INFO,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user