dix: remove now-erroneous comment about frozen slave devices.
A direct grab on a slave device through XI2 detaches it, regardless of whether the grab is sync or async. So this comment doesn't apply to XI2 anyway. For XI1, aside from your life being miserable already, it doesn't matter as XI1 does not have a concept of attachment. You can freeze a device and if you don't freeze _all_ other devices at the same time, the master device can still happily send events to the client. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net> Acked-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
93ff1bc588
commit
c0d9419131
|
@ -1414,11 +1414,6 @@ CheckGrabForSyncs(DeviceIntPtr thisDev, Bool thisMode, Bool otherMode)
|
|||
thisDev->deviceGrab.sync.other = NullGrab;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
XXX: Direct slave grab won't freeze the paired master device.
|
||||
The correct thing to do would be to freeze all SDs attached to the
|
||||
paired master device.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (IsMaster(thisDev))
|
||||
{
|
||||
dev = GetPairedDevice(thisDev);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user