EDID: Carp about 1.4 monitors with no preferred refresh rate
You would think, having finally tightened down the spec, that monitor vendors would bother to implement what the spec actually mandates. You would be wrong.
This commit is contained in:
parent
b2d2af76b4
commit
fb882b3da1
|
@ -398,8 +398,12 @@ print_detailed_monitor_section(int scrnIndex,
|
|||
if (r->supported_scaling & SCALING_VSTRETCH)
|
||||
xf86ErrorF(" vstretch");
|
||||
xf86ErrorF("\n");
|
||||
xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex, X_INFO, "Preferred refresh rate: %d\n",
|
||||
r->preferred_refresh);
|
||||
if (r->preferred_refresh)
|
||||
xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex, X_INFO, "Preferred refresh rate: %d\n",
|
||||
r->preferred_refresh);
|
||||
else
|
||||
xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex, X_INFO, "Buggy monitor, no preferred "
|
||||
"refresh rate given\n");
|
||||
} else if (r->max_clock != 0) {
|
||||
xf86ErrorF(" PixClock max %i MHz\n", r->max_clock);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue