"master" points to the device this device is attached to. Event sent by the
device will also be routed through the master.
master and spriteOwner are mutually exclusive.
A lot of EDID writers apparently end up stuffing centimeters (like the
maximum image size field) into the detailed timings, instead of millimeters.
Some of them only get it wrong in one direction. Also, add a quirk to let
us mark the largest 75hz mode as preferred, which will often be used for
EDID 1.0 CRTs.
If none is present, a default one will be created. This will be attached
to either the first device section in the xorg.conf (allowing you to
specify something like using EXA without having a screen section) or a
default screen section if none is present in the file.
This will allow the screen to not explicitly have a device section. If
this is the case and there is a device section in the xorg.conf, the first
one will be used. If there is no device section at all, a default one will
be created that loads the automatically determined module.
This is what we're currently shipping in Debian. Enables the ability for
drivers to ship a text file listing PCI ID's they support, and have the
server read them on startup when no driver is specified. This works, but
isn't the final solution.
We re-pair them with the VCP, not a real device! If we would do otherwise,
somebody may change our keyboard focus and thus get us typing where we don't
want to type.
If the pairing client is not set, then the pairing is initiated internally
(e.g. when a new keyboard device is configured). In this case we _must_ pair
regardless of who is the pairing client.
* hw/kdrive/ephyr/ephyr.c:
(ephyrInitScreen): try and detect when the host has no
DRI support. In that case, switch to the -nodri behaviour.
When in the -nodri case, make sure not to skip glx visual
initialisation.
* hw/kdrive/ephyr/ephyrinit.c:
(ddxProcessArgument): disabling visual init here
is bad because it gets disabled even when we want
to use software GL, leading to Xephyr :1 -nodri
crashing in mesa.
This reverts commit 1365aeff54.
It defeated the optimization for drivers that don't provide a CreatePixmap
hook. The optimization makes no sense for drivers that do anyway, so disable
it for them completely.
We can now launch GL or XV apps in any of the
Xephyr screens we want.
* hw/kdrive/ephyr/hostx.c,h:
(hostx_get_window):
(hostx_create_window): make these functions be screen
number aware.
* hw/kdrive/ephyr/XF86dri.c : fix some compiler warnings.
* hw/kdrive/ephyr/ephyrdri.c:
(ephyrDRIQueryDirectRenderingCapable),
(ephyrDRIOpenConnection),
(ephyrDRIAuthConnection),
(ephyrDRICloseConnection),
(ephyrDRIGetClientDriverName),
(ephyrDRICreateContext),
(ephyrDRIDestroyContext),
(ephyrDRICreateDrawable),
(ephyrDRIGetDrawableInfo),
(ephyrDRIGetDeviceInfo): in all those functions, don't forward
the screen number we receive - from the client - to the host X.
We (Xephyr) are always targetting the same X display screen, which is
the one Xephyr got launched against. So we enforce that in the code.
* hw/kdrive/ephyr/ephyrdriext.c:
(EphyrMirrorHostVisuals): make this duplicate the visuals of the host X
default screen into a given Xephyr screen. This way we have a chance
to update the visuals of all Xephyr screen to make them mirror those
of the host X.
(many other places): specify screen number where required by the api
change in hostx.h.
* hw/kdrive/ephyr/ephyrglxext.c: specify screen number where required
by the api change in hostx.h
* hw/kdrive/ephyr/ephyrhostglx.c: don't forward the screen number we
receive - from the client - to the host X.
We (Xephyr) are always targetting the same
X display screen, which is
the one Xephyr got launched against. So we enforce that in the code.
* hw/kdrive/ephyr/ephyrhostvideo.c,h: take in account the screen number received
from the client app. This is useful to know on which Xephyr screen we
need to display video stuff.
* hw/kdrive/ephyr/ephyrvideo.c: update this to reflect the API change
in hw/kdrive/ephyr/ephyrhostvideo.h.
(ephyrSetPortAttribute): when parameters are not valid
- they exceed their validity range - send them to the host anyway
and do not return an error to clients.
Some host expose buggy validity range, so rejecting client for that
is too harsh.