If the libEGL we are using has eglGetPlatformDisplayEXT, yet it still
returns NULL, then this very likely means that it does not support the
type (e.g. EGL_PLATFORM_GBM_MESA) passed in, and then returning NULL is
the right thing to do.
This avoids falling back to an eglGetDisplay() implementation which does
not understands the passed in gbm handle, treats it as a pointer to
something else completely, followed by a crash sooner or later.
Specifically this fixes using the nvidia binary driver, with nvidia's
libEGL + the modesetting driver on a secondary GPU crashing inside
glamor_egl_init() sometimes.
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The extension does not exist in the registry, thus needs to know they're
using EGL 1.5 in order to determine the eglGetPlatformDisplay function
pointer is valid.
Thus brings us into some lovely circular dependency.
Since mesa won't be able (in the foreseeable future) to export the KHR
flavour of extension (another way one could assume that EGL 1.5 is
available) just drop all the heuristics and use the
EGL_EXT_platform_base extension.
In practise (checked with the Mali driver) any EGL 1.5 driver will
advertise support for EGL_EXT_platform_base.
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
eglGetDisplay forces the implementation to guess which kind of display
it's been handed. glvnd does something different from Mesa, and in
general it's impossible for the library to get this right. Add a new
inline that gets the logic right, and works around a quirk in epoxy.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
