Most (but not all) of these were found by using
codespell --builtin clear,rare,usage,informal,code,names
but not everything reported by that was fixed.
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
When Retrieving touch delivery data we need to check if we have an active
grab on such device, and in that case use it to delivery events.
If we don't do this, when rejecting the touch events in DeactivatePointerGrab,
we will end-up in creating an implicit grab that will change the device
deviceGrab's state, causing a recursion during TouchEndTouch.
Fixes#7https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96536
Commits 816015648f and
fee0827a9a made it so that
wl_keyboard::enter doesn't result in X clients getting KeyPress events
while still updating our internal xkb state to be in sync with the
host compositor.
wl_keyboard::leave needs to be handled in the same way as its
semantics from an X client POV should be the same as an X grab getting
triggered, i.e. X clients shouldn't get KeyRelease events for keys
that are still down at that point.
This patch uses LeaveNotify for these events on wl_keyboard::leave and
changes the current use of KeymapNotify to EnterNotify instead just to
keep some symmetry between both cases.
On ProcessDeviceEvent() we still need to deactivate X grabs if needed
for KeyReleases.
Signed-off-by: Rui Matos <tiagomatos@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This removes all of the SIGIO handling support used for input
throughout the X server, preparing the way for using threads for input
handling instead.
Places calling OsBlockSIGIO and OsReleaseSIGIO are marked with calls
to stub functions input_lock/input_unlock so that we don't lose this
information.
xfree86 SIGIO support is reworked to use internal versions of
OsBlockSIGIO and OsReleaseSIGIO.
v2: Don't change locking order (Peter Hutterer)
v3: Comment weird && FALSE in xf86Helper.c
Leave errno save/restore in xf86ReadInput
Squash with stub adding patch (Peter Hutterer)
v4: Leave UseSIGIO config parameter so that
existing config files don't break (Peter Hutterer)
v5: Split a couple of independent patch bits out
of kinput.c (Peter Hutterer)
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The touchpoint knows whether it should be emulating or not and we have a check
for that later. Check for this before we generate the event and try to deliver
it, lest we trigger a bug warning.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282252
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Add a new event source type for keypress events synthesised from focus
notifications (e.g. KeymapNotify from the parent server, when running
nested). This is used to keep the keys-down array in sync with the host
server's, without sending actual keypress events to clients.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The client window can be closed in the middle of a touch sequence,
e.g. Qt 4 closes popup windows on MousePress and Qt 5.5 will do it
on TouchBegin. In this case the state of mouse buttons will not be
updated on TouchEnd because ProcessTouchEvent() calls UpdateDeviceState()
only when the event has been sent to the client. It results in a
stuck left mouse button.
This patch leads to calling UpdateDeviceState() in case the client
can't be found.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Volkov <a.volkov@rusbitech.ru>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
While it's documented in the XACE spec, the XACE_KEY_AVAIL hook is
currently never actually invoked by the xserver.
This hook was added in 13c6713c82 (25 Aug 2006), but as the keyboard
processing was moved into XKB, the hook was forgotten and silently
dropped. The code calling this hook was removed by 7af53799c (4 Jan
2009), but it was probably already unused before that.
This patch re-adds support for this hook. The "count" hook parameter is
unused.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Eikum <aeikum@codeweavers.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
I've been seeing sporadic (anywhere from once every few days to 3-4
times a day) crashes and freezes in X. The problematic behaviour isn't
always the same, but I chose a particular incident to debug, and found
that X was segfaulting in updateMotionHistory, on line 575 of
dix/getevents.c.
After some further investigation, I found that the bug was being
triggered when a SIGIO was received in DeepCopyPointerClasses, between
the AllocValuatorClass call (line 540) and updating the to->valuator
pointer (line 545). AllocValuatorClass calls realloc() on to->valuator,
so between these lines, it's not guaranteed to point to allocated
memory.
It seems the SIGIO handler is calling updateMotionHistory, which is
reading the memory pointed to by to->valuator and getting a wrong value
for last_motion, which updates buff to point to wildly the wrong place
and thus generates a segfault when a memcpy() is done into buff.
I am attaching a patch which I've been running on that machine for the
past three days, and haven't yet observed any more crashing or freezing
behaviour. The patch simply calls OsBlockSIGIO while
DeepCopyDeviceClasses is in progress, as the state of the X server's
device data structures is not guaranteed to be in a consistent state
during that time.
Debian bug#744303 <https://bugs.debian.org/744303>
Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
==26141== Invalid read of size 8
==26141== at 0x58FAEA: DeliverEmulatedMotionEvent (exevents.c:1484)
An InternalEvent is bigger than a DeviceEvent, thus copying one to the other
reads past the allocated boundary. Shouldn't have any real effect since we
shouldn't access anything past the DeviceEvent boundary if the event type is
correct.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
This will also make it useful for cases when we have a new keymap to
apply to a device but don't have a source device.
Reviewed-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@bitplanet.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The other values are checked correctly, but if a modifier was outside the
allowed range, it would go unnoticed and cause a out-of-bounds read error for
any mask equal or larger than 256. The DetailRec where we store the grab masks
is only sized to 8 * sizeof(Mask).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
This lets us stop using the 'pointer' typedef in Xdefs.h as 'pointer'
is used throughout the X server for other things, and having duplicate
names generates compiler warnings.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
When a grab on a slave device is deactivated, the master device must
be checked, just in case there were events from other devices while
the slave device was stolen away by the passive grab. This may
introduce misbehaviors on mismatching valuators and device features
later on UpdateDeviceState().
Signed-off-by: Carlos Garnacho <carlosg@gnome.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If an touch triggers an async button grab and that grab does not have the
ButtonReleaseMask set, the TouchEnd is never delivered, deliveries is 0 and
the grab is never deactivated.
If the grab is pointer async and keyboard sync, the keyboard events are stuck
in EnqueueEvent until some other pointer event terminates the grab.
Change this to check for the number of listeners. If we're about to deliver a
TouchEnd to a passive pointer grab, the number of listeners is already 1 -
pointer grabs always accept so other listeners were removed.
X.Org Bug 71878 <http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71878>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Bug #71878 describes a bug resulting in the server ceasing to respond to
keyboard input after a touch event. The problem might be the following:
DeliverTouchBeginEvent tries to deliver an event to a listener of type
LISTENER_POINTER_REGULAR, taking the following if branch,
if (listener->type == LISTENER_POINTER_REGULAR ||
listener->type == LISTENER_POINTER_GRAB) {
rc = DeliverTouchEmulatedEvent(dev, ti, ev, listener, client, win,
grab, xi2mask);
if (rc == Success) {
listener->state = LISTENER_IS_OWNER;
/* async grabs cannot replay, so automatically accept this touch */
if (dev->deviceGrab.grab &&
dev->deviceGrab.fromPassiveGrab &&
dev->deviceGrab.grab->pointerMode == GrabModeAsync)
ActivateEarlyAccept(dev, ti);
}
goto out;
}
DeliverTouchEmulatedEvent succeeds. The deviceGrab meets all
three of the conditions of the inner if, enters
ActivateEarlyAccept which then fails due to,
BUG_RETURN(ti->listeners[0].type != LISTENER_GRAB &&
ti->listeners[0].type != LISTENER_POINTER_GRAB);
That is, despite listener->type == LISTENER_POINTER_REGULAR. With my
non-existent knowledge of XINPUT, it seems like the solution here
might be to only ActivateEarlyAccept when listener->type ==
LISTENER_POINTER_GRAB.
Signed-off-by: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
gcc -Wlogical-op
exevents.c: In function 'DeliverEmulatedMotionEvent':
exevents.c:1480:13: warning: logical 'or' of collectively exhaustive
tests is always true [-Wlogical-op]
The relevant snippet of exevents.c:
1479 if (ti->listeners[0].type != LISTENER_POINTER_REGULAR ||
1480 ti->listeners[0].type != LISTENER_POINTER_GRAB)
1481 return;
This condition was always true, causing dropped motion events.
Reported-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Ungrabbing a device during an active touch grab rejects the grab. Ungrabbing
a device during an active pointer grab accepts the grab.
Rejection is not really an option for a pointer-emulated grab, if a client
has a button mask on the window it would get a ButtonPress emulated after
UngrabDevice. That is against the core grab behaviour.
X.Org Bug 66720 <http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66720>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre@mecheye.net>
If we have one listener left but it's not a grab, it cannot be in
LISTENER_HAS_ACCEPTED state.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Introduced in xorg-server-1.13.99.901-2-g9ad0fdb. Storing the grab pointer
in the listener turns out to be a bad idea. If the grab is not an active
grab or an implicit grab, the pointer stored is the one to the grab attached
on the window. This grab may be removed if the client calls UngrabButton or
similar while the touch is still active, leaving a dangling pointer.
To avoid this, copy the grab wherever we need to reference it later. This
is also what we do for pointer/keyboard grabs, where we copy the grab as
soon as it becomes active.
Reported-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
EmitTouchEnd calls DeliverTouchEvents directly instead of through
public.processInputProc. If a device is frozen, the TouchEnd is
processed while the device is waiting for a XAllowEvents and thus ends the
touch point (and the grab) before the client decided what to do with it. In
the case of ReplayPointer, this loses the event.
This is a hack, but making EmitTouchEnd use processInputProc breaks
approximately everything, especially the touch point is cleaned up during
ProcessTouchEvents. Working around that is a bigger hack than this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If a device is frozen in results to a grab, we need to enqueue the events.
This makes things complicated, and hard to follow since touch events are now
replayed in the history, pushed into EnqueueEvent, then replayed later
during PlayReleasedEvents in response to an XAllowEvents.
While the device is frozen, no touch events are processed, so if there is a
touch client with ownership mask _below_ the grab this will delay the
delivery and potentially screw gesture recognition. However, this is the
behaviour we have already anyway if the top-most client is a sync pgrab or
there is a sync grab active on the device when the TouchBegin was generated.
(also note, such a client would only reliably work in case of ReplayPointer
anyway)
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If a touch is pending_finish and we just punted it to the next owner, that
client must receive a TouchEnd event.
If we just punted to the last owner and that owner not a touch grab, we need
to end the touch since this is the last event to be sent, and the client
cannot accept/reject this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Delivering an event changes the state to LISTENER_IS_OWNER and we thus lose
the information of early acceptance.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
ActivateEarlyAccept() can only be called from a grabbing client, so we can
ignore the rest. And it's easy enough to get the client from that since
9ad0fdb135.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If a TouchBegin is sent to a core client, that client is now the owner.
By the time the TouchEnd is being processed, the client cannot replay
anymore, so we can assume that this is the final touch end and we can clean
up the touch record.
Note: DeliverTouchEmulatedEvent is called for all listeners and immediately
bails out if the client is not the owner and thus shouldn't yet get the
event. Thus, check the return code.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
ef64b5ee97 (which introduced the
TOUCH_CLIENT_ID check) has a wrong assumption that generated touch events
(TOUCH_CLIENT_ID) should not terminate passive grabs.
This is untrue, a TouchEnd may be generated in response to a TouchReject
higher up. If we _deliver_ an event to a client, terminate the passive grab.
This requires us to count the actually delivered events too (first hunk).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If we only have a single touch-grabbing client, setting the client as owner
would clean up the touch once the TouchEnd was processed. If the client then
calls XIAllowTouches() it will receive a BadValue for the touch ID (since
the internal record is already cleaned up).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If drivers supply incorrect values don't just quietly return False, spew to
the log so we can detect what's going on. All these cases are driver bugs
and should be fixed immediately.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Comment dates back to a pre-release version of XI2 that supported keysym
grabs. That never made it into a release, it was ditched before.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
The event struct is different, causing memory corruption on 1.13 and 1.14,
as can be witnessed in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56578
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The commit message to 6764471901 explains it,
but that doesn't stop the WTF moment when reading the code.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
We do the same thing here, compress them into one body.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Instead of accessing ti->listener[0] all the time.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
All callers currently ignore the new value, so this patch has no effect.
Inverse call graph:
DeliverTouchEmulatedEvent
DeliverEmulatedMotionEvent Ignores value
DeliverTouchBeginEvent
DeliverTouchEvent
DeliverTouchEvents Ignores value
DeliverTouchEndEvent
DeliverTouchEvent
DeliverTouchEvents Ignores value
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
mask[(MAX_VALUATORS + 7)/8] is larger than data[MAX_VALUATORS], so static
code checkers think we may be running OOB on the data array. Mask is
initialized to 0, so this should not happen, but change it anyway to shut up
code analyzer noise.
X.Org Bug 59939 <http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59939>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Instead of guessing what resource type the listener is and what property to
retrieve, store the resource type in the listener directly.
Breaks XIT test cases:
TouchGrabTestMultipleTaps.PassiveGrabPointerEmulationMultipleTouchesFastSuccession
Fixes https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56557
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@ubuntu.com>
This places a pointer to the grab related to a TouchListener directly
in the TouchListener structure rather than hoping to find the grab
later on using the resource ID.
Passive grabs have resource ID in the resource DB so they can be
removed when a client exits, and those resource IDs get copied when
activated, but implicit grabs are constructed on-the-fly and have no
resource DB entry.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Conflicts:
Xi/xichangehierarchy.c
Small conflict with the patch from
Xi: don't use devices after removing them
Was easily resolved by hand.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
If the grab_window is the barrier window and the client owns the grab,
deliver as normal grabbed event (respecting owner_events). Otherwise,
deliver as usual.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre@mecheye.net>
This adds support for clients that would like to get a notification
every time a barrier is hit, and allows clients to temporarily release
a barrier so that pointers can go through them, without having to
destroy and recreate barriers.
Based on work by Chris Halse Rogers <chris.halse.rogers@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre@mecheye.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Alan Coopersmith
Adam Jackson
Marco Trevisan (Treviño)
Rui Matos
Keith Packard
Peter Hutterer
Daniel Stone
Alexander Volkov
Andrew Eikum
Olivier Fourdan
Steven McDonald
Carlos Garnacho
Ben Gamari
Maarten Lankhorst
Jasper St. Pierre