Presumably, some intelligent, XI2-aware management app will be calling
XISetClientPointer on behalf of other clients; this check makes sure
the target client has permission on the device.
Requires changing the prototype to return status code instead of Bool.
Signed-off-by: Eamon Walsh <ewalsh@tycho.nsa.gov>
Acked-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
event->type is always GenericEvent for XI2 events. Instead, XI_ButtonPress
(the generic event's evtype must be stored.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
GetMaster is more reliable than GetPairedDevice, it always returns the
keyboard/pointer if desired, even if the wrong device was passed in.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Let EventToXI, EventToCore and EventToXI2 return BadMatch if there's no
matching event for this protocol spec.
Adjust the delivery paths to cope with BadMatch errors (and clean them up on
the way).
As a side-effect, this fixes server crashes on proximity events for a
grabbed device.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
For proximity events, the XI2 type is 0 and inputMasks never got set in the
preceding condition. As a result, proximity events got never delivered.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
These grabs are suported through two fake devices inputInfo.all_devices and
inputInfo.all_master_devices. These devices are not part of the device list
and are only initialised for their device id, nothing else.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
A passive XI2 grab always uses the paired master device as a modifier
device. After issuing a passive grab, the slave may be reattached to a
different master and hence the modifier device may change.
Rework addresses two issues:
- storing the master device's pointer is a bad idea, we need to store the ID
of the device in case it disappears during the grab.
- restoring the old master did not actually reattach the device. Fixed now.
grab->type is the device type and XI2 types overlap with core events (being
less than GenericEvent). Thus, for passive grabs the grab device would be
overwritten with whatever device was activating it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Extension devices have ActivateKeyboardGrab as their grab activation
function, hence we need to ensure the implicit passive grab flag is set
accordingly in the grab for further event delivery.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If an implicit passive grab is active, the XI event mask is in
grab->deviceMask. Otherwise, for explicit grabs, the XI event mask is in
grab->eventMask.
Reported-by: Thomas Jaeger
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If a passive enter or focus in grab activates, send additional enter or
focus events with mode XIPassiveGrabNotify to the grabbing client.
Likewise, if the grab deactivates, send additional leave or focus out
events.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Enter grabs are checked for in CheckMotion(), each time the sprite window
changes the current grab is deactivated (if applicable) and the new grab is
activated (if applicable). Exception - if the grab is on a parent window of
the current window since we keep the grab across descendants.
Since CheckMotion() may change the grab status of a device, we mustn't get
"dev->deviceGrab.grab" in ProcessOtherEvents until after CheckMotion().
FocusIn grabs are checked in much the same manner.
The event delivery for grabs replaces the NotifyNormal on window change with
a NotifyGrab on window change. Note that this happens before the grab
activates, so the EnterNotify(NotifyGrab) is still delivered to the window,
not to the grabbing client. This is in line with the core protocol semantics
for NotifyGrab events.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
There's devices (e.g. some barcode readers) that have axes but no buttons.
When such a device sends a motion event, the valuator and button class is
copied into the master pointer (i.e. removing the button class).
So we need a couple of extra sanity checks for the button class to exist.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
There's no need for internal events to be a struct with a single nested
union, we might as well make the union itself the InternalEvent.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
isMaster is not enough as long as we differ between master pointers and
keyboard. With flexible device classes, the usual checks for whether a
master device is a pointer (currently check for ->button, ->valuators or
->key) do not work as an SD may post an event through a master and mess this
check up.
Example, a device with valuators but no buttons would remove the button
class from the VCP and thus result in the
IsPointerDevice(inputInfo.pointer) == FALSE.
This will become worse in the future when new device classes are introduced
that aren't provided in the current system (e.g. a switch class).
This patch replaces isMaster with "type", one of SLAVE, MASTER_POINTER and
MASTER_KEYBOARD. All checks for dev->isMaster are replaced with an
IsMaster(dev).
Add a proper access mode, and reverse the logic of the return value.
Zero ("Success") is returned on success from the hook calls.
Signed-off-by: Eamon Walsh <ewalsh@tycho.nsa.gov>
Error: Write outside array bounds at Xext/geext.c:406
in function 'GEWindowSetMask' [Symbolic analysis]
In array dereference of cli->nextSib[extension] with index 'extension'
Array size is 128 elements (of 4 bytes each), index <= 128
Error: Buffer overflow at dix/events.c:592
in function 'SetMaskForEvent' [Symbolic analysis]
In array dereference of filters[deviceid] with index 'deviceid'
Array size is 20 elements (of 512 bytes each), index >= 0 and index <= 20
Error: Read buffer overflow at hw/xfree86/loader/loader.c:226
in function 'LoaderOpen' [Symbolic analysis]
In array dereference of refCount[new_handle] with index 'new_handle'
Array size is 256 elements (of 4 bytes each), index >= 1 and index <= 256
These bugs were found using the Parfait source code analysis tool.
For more information see http://research.sun.com/projects/parfait
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@sun.com>
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
All other functions are pushed into where they seemed to fit.
main.c is now linked separately into libmain.a and linked in by the various
DDXs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
All other functions are pushed into where they seemed to fit.
main.c is now linked separately into libmain.a and linked in by the various
DDXs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Yes, this means we have even more arguments to GrabDevice. But it beats having
a copy of most but not all of GrabDevice in ProcGrabPointer.
Also, reshuffle the order of parameters, the CARD* status is a return value
and should be last.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
