This is done by the XKB code these days anyway, so we might as well ignore it
and keep using the stanard stuff.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
A grep on xorg/* revealed there's no consumer of this define.
Quote Alan Coopersmith:
"The consumer was in past versions of the headers now located
in proto/x11proto - for instance, in X11R6.0's xc/include/Xproto.h,
all the event definitions were only available if NEED_EVENTS were
defined, and all the reply definitions required NEED_REPLIES.
Looks like Xproto.h dropped them by X11R6.3, which didn't have
the #ifdef's anymore, so these are truly ancient now."
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Rather than assuming rules in the CoreKeyboardProc, init the default rules in
InitCoreDevices, then re-use them later.
In the xfree86 DDX, set the rules to "base" or "evdev", depending on whether
we'll load kbd or evdev.
If we create a new MD, use pc105,us as default and re-use the rules file used
previously.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@redhat.com>
Some pointer devices have key classes (e.g. MS Optical Desktop 2000). The
previous test was performed as Error if ptr -> keybd or keybd -> ptr. This
doesnt work with such devices. New test is Succeed if ptr->ptr or
keybd->keybd.