New access modes are being passed to the device access hook for XI2:
DixCreateAccess for creating a new master device;
DixAdd/RemoveAccess for attaching/removing slave devices to a master; and
DixListProp/GetProp/SetPropAccess for device properties.
Refer to the XACE-Spec document in xorg-docs, section "Device Access."
Signed-off-by: Eamon Walsh <ewalsh@tycho.nsa.gov>
Master devices provide the union of all attached slave devices' buttons,
i.e. the number of buttons on the master device is always the number of
buttons of the slave device with the highest number of buttons. When slaves
are attached or detached, the master device adjusts the button number to
reflect the new buttons.
On a slave switch, this slave's button labels are copied into the master (up
to slave->num_buttons). The remaining button labels (if any) stay as they
are. Thus, if any of the higher buttons is still pressed, it reflects the
label of the last pressed device that provided this button.
If two devices press the same button and it is differently labelled the last
pressed one will be reflected in the master device.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The previous code would always skip the last valuator due to a wrong
upper boundary in the loop. last_valuator is the index of the last set
valuator - which also means it must be initialized to -1, not 0.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Some files (notably those merged with MPX before XI2 came along) didn't use
a 'xi' prefix. This patch changes all of them to meaningful names.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
zero-length masks are supposed to clear the device's mask.
ProcXISelectEvents passes these masks through directly, so we need to clear
the bits here if such a mask is supplied.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If a passive enter or focus in grab activates, send additional enter or
focus events with mode XIPassiveGrabNotify to the grabbing client.
Likewise, if the grab deactivates, send additional leave or focus out
events.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Enter grabs are checked for in CheckMotion(), each time the sprite window
changes the current grab is deactivated (if applicable) and the new grab is
activated (if applicable). Exception - if the grab is on a parent window of
the current window since we keep the grab across descendants.
Since CheckMotion() may change the grab status of a device, we mustn't get
"dev->deviceGrab.grab" in ProcessOtherEvents until after CheckMotion().
FocusIn grabs are checked in much the same manner.
The event delivery for grabs replaces the NotifyNormal on window change with
a NotifyGrab on window change. Note that this happens before the grab
activates, so the EnterNotify(NotifyGrab) is still delivered to the window,
not to the grabbing client. This is in line with the core protocol semantics
for NotifyGrab events.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
In the case of a RevertToFollowKeyboard, the master device should be used
(since this is the closest equivalent to the VCK as before). Only if the
master keyboard is the same as the device, revert to the VCK itself.
This didn't use to be a problem when devices could only be pointers or
keyboards, not both. Nowadays, slave devices may have both buttons and
keyboards, and in this case we don't want to deactivate a passive keyboard
grab when a button release is detected.
There's devices (e.g. some barcode readers) that have axes but no buttons.
When such a device sends a motion event, the valuator and button class is
copied into the master pointer (i.e. removing the button class).
So we need a couple of extra sanity checks for the button class to exist.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Copying all classes into the master device has drawbacks for hybrid devices
(devices that are both mice and keyboards). If such a device posts an event,
it's key classes are moved into the VCP. The key event itself is unaffected
by keyboard grabs and the like.
Partial class copying copies depending on the event and copies the classes
into the right master device (i.e. the VCK for key events, the VCP for
pointer events).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
There's no need for internal events to be a struct with a single nested
union, we might as well make the union itself the InternalEvent.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
isMaster is not enough as long as we differ between master pointers and
keyboard. With flexible device classes, the usual checks for whether a
master device is a pointer (currently check for ->button, ->valuators or
->key) do not work as an SD may post an event through a master and mess this
check up.
Example, a device with valuators but no buttons would remove the button
class from the VCP and thus result in the
IsPointerDevice(inputInfo.pointer) == FALSE.
This will become worse in the future when new device classes are introduced
that aren't provided in the current system (e.g. a switch class).
This patch replaces isMaster with "type", one of SLAVE, MASTER_POINTER and
MASTER_KEYBOARD. All checks for dev->isMaster are replaced with an
IsMaster(dev).
dev->u.lastSlave was not signal safe since it was accessed by the DIX and
during signal handling.
Replaced with:
'dev->last.slave' for the signal handler's lastSlave (used to generate
DeviceChangedEvents), .
'dev->u.lastSlave' for the DIX lastSlave (currently only used in
change_modmap)
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Key events may change the modifier state, so we need to get the prev_state for
those (i.e. without the changes by the event already applied).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Some keyboards (?) advertise more than MAX_VALUATORS axes. Parts of the
internal event delivery relies on not having more than MAX_VALUATOR axes, so
let's cap it down.
If there's real devices that require more than the current 36, I'm sure we can
bump this up.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Virtually all callers use
XkbGetRulesDefault(&rmlvo);
InitKeyboardDeviceStruct(..., rmlvo);
Let's save them the trouble and accept NULL as a hint to take the
default RMLVO.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Benjamin Close <Benjamin.Close@clearchain.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Split ChangeMasterDeviceClasses into an extra XISendDeviceChangedEvent that
assembles the XI2 wire event for the DeviceChanged event. Re-use this when
detaching the last SD.
Not quite perfect yet, we still copy the device classes from the slave now
rather than from the data we had when the event occured. But it's a start.
(We can now unexport SizeDeviceInfo and CopySwapDevices, not needed anymore)
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The masks were originally designed to generically handle event masks for
extensions. Since all that is in-server anyway, it's much better writing
custom event masks for those extensions that need it and not providing a
unified mechanism.
XI2 needs more than the current implementation, which is already too complex
for most other extensions. good riddance.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Best to FatalError if a wrong event comes in. At least that forces me to fix
it really quickly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
dixLookupResource attempted to automatically detect whether the caller
wanted a lookup by-type or by-class, unfortunately, it guessed wrong for
RT_NONE. Instead of trying to make the guess better, this patch just reverts
the unification and creates separate functions for each operation.