The VCP may have active touch grabs. The touch records must be kept so
these touch grabs may be accepted/rejected in the future. This means the
touch class list will not represent the touch class of the attached
slave device if it does not have a touch class, but we already were
breaking that assumption by keeping a separate touches array for the
VCP.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The VCP has its own touches array, don't overwrite it when the class is
copied from the SD to the master.
Reported-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
In this case, we have ended the touch because the last owner has
rejected it. We need to return from the function right now so we don't
attempt to dereference another touch client for early acceptance
processing.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@ubuntu.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Similar to the fix in fcda98c486. This
ensures we show the correct logical state of the buttons in device focus
events too.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This doesn't really implement early accept as it should. Ideally, the
server should send end events to all subsequent touch clients as soon as
an early accept comes in. However, this implementation is still protocol
compliant. We can always improve it later.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This function is mostly correct for early reject usage. With a small
change to pass the client resource explicitly and making the
TouchOwnership event optional, it is usable for all rejection scenarios.
This change exports it for use outside Xi/exevents.c and modifies the
name accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The server often needs to generate and deliver TouchEnd events for
circumstances including touch grab acceptance and rejection. This change
refactors the code so it can be used more easily.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The current code short-circuits around the block that removes the
rejecting listener if it is the only listener left. It also does not
delete the touchpoint record if the touch has not physically ended.
This change ensures the listener is removed under these circumstances.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@ubuntu.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
A touchpoint is ended when no further processing will take place for it.
This includes the situation where there is only one grabbing client, and
the client receives a touch end before it has accepted/rejected the
touchpoint.
This change ensures that a delivered touch end event is converted into a
touch update event under the above scenario. If the event is left as a
touch end event, the touchpoint will be ended in ProcessTouchEvent().
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If the device is already grabbed, don't activate the passive grab, it screws
with our event masks. Just deliver to the grabbing client instead.
Reported-by: Carlos Garnacho <carlosg@gnome.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Ownership changes don't get processed directly when they happen, instead the
DIX submits an ownership event which goes through ProcessTouchEvents and
ProcessTouchOwnershipEvents.
Then on the required events are generated and sent to clients.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Includes a hack for implicit grab activation, because integrating this
requires a larger rewrite and I'm not sleeping enough as it is.
Right now, we deliver the event and check before/after if there is an
implicit grab on. If one activated, then store the event in the grab and
switch the listener type to a grab listener.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Does not include pointer emulation handling.
Does include partial ownership handling but not the actual processing of
ownership events.
Note: this commit is a retroactive commit extracted from a series of ~50
commits and may thus appear a bit more complicated than what you'd write out
from scratch.
Pointer processing tree is roughly:
- ProcessOtherEvents
- ProcessTouchEvents
- DeliverTouchEvents
- DeliverTouchBeginEvent|DeliverTouchEndEvent|...
- DeliverOneTouchEvent
Also hooks up the event history playing to the right function now.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Co-authored-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Update the logical button state for pointer-emulating events. Button state
must be kept separate from the ButtonClassRec to avoid clearing the button
state on a touch end if there is a physical button still down.
And obviously don't change the button state if we're currently replaying the
event history for some client.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
These structs will be used to store touch-related data, events and
information.
Drivers must call InitTouchClassDeviceStruct to set up a multi-touch capable
device.
Touchpoints for the DDX and the DIX are handled separately - touchpoints
submitted by the driver/DDX will be stored in the DDXTouchPointInfoRec. Once
the touchpoints are processed by the DIX, new TouchPointInfoRecs are created
and stored. This process is already used for pointer events with the
last.valuators field.
Note that this patch does not actually add the generation of touch events,
only the required structs.
TouchListeners are (future) recipients of touch or emulated pointer events.
Each listener is in a state, depending which event they have already
received. The type of listener defines how the listener got to be one.
Co-authored-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
No-one can generated them yet, but if they could, we'd be processing them
like there was no tomorrow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
The are the same as device events internally but require the touch ID
separately from the detail.button field (the protocol uses the detail field
for the touch id).
For simpler integration of pointer emulation we need to set the
detail.button field while keeping the touchid around.
Add the three new touch event types to the various places in the server
where they need to be handled. The actual handling of the events is somewhat
more complicated in most places.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
All the DeepCopy stuff really needs to be shared between the init calls the
drivers use and this code here. Too many bugs by not keeping the two in
sync.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
They achieve the same thing, re-use the more generic InputLevel so we can
convert to/fro easier.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Functional change: for a button mapped to 0, the motionHintWindow is not
updated to the NullWindow anymore. Before it got updated unconditionally to
the button mapping. I have no idea what the practical effect of this is, but
I guess it's closer to the correct behaviour: pressing a button that's
logically disabled now does not disrupt the motion hint delivery.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
'state' is shadowed by the XKB 'state' as well (which feeds into the event
too), so rename this one to clarify that this is the core event state only.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Once grabs start having nested memory locations, we can't just use the
GrabRec on the stack anymore, we need to alloc/copy/free the grabs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Does what it says on the box, complements MakeInputMask.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Currently not needed since the InputClientRec is a self-contained struct. As
part of the touch rework that won't be the case in the future and a function
to allocate/free memory appropriately is required.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Wherever it's obvious which device we need (keyboard or pointer), use
GetMaster() instead of GetPairedDevice(). It is more reliable in actually
getting the device type we want.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
They don't have a KeyClassRec, but we must still allow passive grabs on
them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Tested-by: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
If we're sending the event for a given device, make sure the deviceid is
that of the device.
This allows callers to use the same DCE for slave and master without having
to fiddle the DCE's internal fields.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Instead of device and master (and just using master), drop the master
argument and let the callers pass in the device the event is to be sent for.
No effective functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
For scroll wheel support, we used to send buttons 4/5 and 6/7 for
horizontal/vertical positive/negative scroll events. For touchpads, we
really want more fine-grained scroll values. GetPointerEvents now
accepts both old-school scroll button presses, and new-style scroll axis
events, while emitting both types of events to support both old and new
clients.
This works with the new XIScrollClass to mark axes as scrolling axes.
Drivers mark any valuators that send scroll events with SetScrollValuator.
(Currently missing: the XIDeviceChangeEvent being sent when a driver changes
a scroll axis at run-time. This can be added later.)
Note: the SCROLL_TYPE enums are intentionally different values to the XI2
proto values to avoid copy/overlapping range bugs.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Relative axes are initialized with 0, -1 but so far this never had any
effect as all users of this function (for relative axes) just set it to the
defaults anyway.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Return errors instead of silently ignoring them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Change the DeviceEvent InternalEvent to use doubles for its valuators,
instead of data and data_frac.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
exevents.c: In function 'UpdateDeviceState':
exevents.c:719:9: warning: variable 'bit' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
exevents.c: In function 'ProcessOtherEvent':
exevents.c:889:22: warning: variable 'v' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
exevents.c:888:17: warning: variable 'k' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
No functional changes, prep work for future changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@apple.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@apple.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
The macro is sufficient if called during a development cycle, but not
sufficient information when triggered by a user (e.g.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688693).
Expand what this does to print the event content and a backtrace, so at
least we know where we're coming from. Only the first 32 bytes are printed
since if something goes wrong, the event we have is almost certainly an
xEvent or xError, both restricted to 32 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
commit 678f5396c9 only fixed the
initialization, not the copy. After a slave device change, the valuator
were out of alignment again.
X.Org Bug 36119 <http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36119>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@apple.com>
