Blindly copying will override the focus setting of the master. If there's XI
applications running, they may set the SD focus, while leaving the
MD's focus as it was. In this case, after a class swap we still want to get
the MD's events to the same window as before.
Floating SDs are paired with themselves, so the paired device may not be a
proper keyboard or mouse. Put some extra checks in to avoid dereferencing a
nullpointer later.
Some pointer devices have key classes (e.g. MS Optical Desktop 2000). The
previous test was performed as Error if ptr -> keybd or keybd -> ptr. This
doesnt work with such devices. New test is Succeed if ptr->ptr or
keybd->keybd.
This is a significant shift in how input events are perceived. The common
approach was to treat a core event as a different entity than the XI event.
This could result in the XI event being delivered to a different client than
the core event. This doesn't work nicely if they come from the same device.
Instead, we treat an input event as a single event, that is delivered through
two separate APIs. So when delivering an event, we first try the XI event,
then the core event. If the window want's neither, we go to the parent and
repeat. Once either core or XI has been delivered, the processing stops.
Important: Different to the previous method, if a client registers for core
button events, the parent window will not get XI events. This should only
cause problems when you're mixing core and XI events, so don't do that!
Generic events don't fit into this yet, they cause me headaches.
This should restore the correct passive grab processing. When checking for
passive grabs, the core event is emulated and we check first for XI grabs on
the window, then for core grabs. Regardless of which event activates the grab,
the XI event is stored in the device's EQ.
When replaying the event, we take the XI event and replay it on the next
window, again including the emulation of the core event.
If two devices are attached to the same master device, pressing button 1 on
each of them leads to two button presses from the same device. Some apps
really don't like that.
So we just put a counter in place and only send the first press and the last
release.
The window ID includes the client ID anyway, so we might as well just look up
the client directly instead of trying to get the window first and the client
from the window.
This also fixes a possible issue with XACE. If the client had permission to
write on the client but not on the window, the previous approach would have
failed.
All the rest of XI uses rc and returns rc in case of error, so make
mpx-related stuff comply. This stops the rest of XI sending the error
manually.
This is just a cosmetic change to be in line with the rest.
This doesn't change much, as the struct previously given has the same size as
the ones now anyway. Still, we should be pendantic.
Thanks to Simon Thum for reporting.
If we have one global filter, one pointer may change the filter value and
affect another pointer.
Reproduceable effect:
blackbox and xterm, start dragging xterm then click anywhere with the other
pointer (attached to different masterd device!). The button release resets
the filter[Motion_Filter(button)] value, thus stopping dragging and no event
is sent to the client anymore.
Having the filters set per device gets around this.
Setting it to the size of a pointer is an interesting but equally wrong
approach. Luckily Xlib never used this field anyway so nobody got hurt so far.
Spotted by Simon Thum.
(cherry picked from commit 0f2398d06c)
