The data is already swapped before, so we just post it to the client as-is,
without attempting to swap it again.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
inputstr includes XI2proto.h for the sole purpose of XI_LASTEVENT.
However, using XI_LASTEVENT in the server is prone to errors, if the server
is recompiled against a newer version of the protocol it would bump this
variable and associates bits, including potential ABI.
This patch defines an XI2LASTEVENT for use in the server and removes the
XI2proto.h require. XI2LASTEVENT is the current value of XI_LASTEVENT.
This patch is required by components that require access to inputInfo
(currently xf86-video-geode and xf86-video-cirrus) but should not have a
require for the XI2 protocol.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Two issues that combined to false positives and false negatives.
- The checking for invalid bits must be performed when there are enough bits
that an event outside of LASTEVENT may be selected.
- The first invalid bit is LASTEVENT + 1, not LASTEVENT.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The protocol allows for 16 bit device ids, but the implementation doesn't
yet. We need to break the input ABI once more to shift the DeviceIntRec's
CARD8 to a CARD16, along with some changes in the privates.
Once that is done, revert this patch.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
XIQueryVersion must return the client's version if the client's version is
lower than or equal to the server's version, or the server's version
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
86077f0058ce88ee9b3df5d1ab854eeca43 switched from a boolean to a grabtype
enum. ProcXGrabDevice didn't switch with it. PickPointer during an XI grab
on a slave device would thus return a wrong (or NULL) device and crash the
server.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
These grabs are suported through two fake devices inputInfo.all_devices and
inputInfo.all_master_devices. These devices are not part of the device list
and are only initialised for their device id, nothing else.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
There's use-cases where this is useful, so take the check out preventing
that.
Reported-by: Thomas Jaeger
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If a passive enter or focus in grab activates, send additional enter or
focus events with mode XIPassiveGrabNotify to the grabbing client.
Likewise, if the grab deactivates, send additional leave or focus out
events.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Enter grabs are checked for in CheckMotion(), each time the sprite window
changes the current grab is deactivated (if applicable) and the new grab is
activated (if applicable). Exception - if the grab is on a parent window of
the current window since we keep the grab across descendants.
Since CheckMotion() may change the grab status of a device, we mustn't get
"dev->deviceGrab.grab" in ProcessOtherEvents until after CheckMotion().
FocusIn grabs are checked in much the same manner.
The event delivery for grabs replaces the NotifyNormal on window change with
a NotifyGrab on window change. Note that this happens before the grab
activates, so the EnterNotify(NotifyGrab) is still delivered to the window,
not to the grabbing client. This is in line with the core protocol semantics
for NotifyGrab events.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Not having the resource mask set means we never match an existing grab,
hence we never actually ungrab.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
In the case of a RevertToFollowKeyboard, the master device should be used
(since this is the closest equivalent to the VCK as before). Only if the
master keyboard is the same as the device, revert to the VCK itself.
This didn't use to be a problem when devices could only be pointers or
keyboards, not both. Nowadays, slave devices may have both buttons and
keyboards, and in this case we don't want to deactivate a passive keyboard
grab when a button release is detected.
The wire layout is [struct xXIEventMask][mask bytes]. So the pointer needs
to not only be advanced by the mask bytes, but also by the size of the
struct.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
chdevcur.c:97: warning: ‘SecurityLookupIDByType’ is deprecated (declared at
../include/resource.h:269)
xiproperty.c:200: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘GetEventFilter’ from
incompatible pointer type
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
There's devices (e.g. some barcode readers) that have axes but no buttons.
When such a device sends a motion event, the valuator and button class is
copied into the master pointer (i.e. removing the button class).
So we need a couple of extra sanity checks for the button class to exist.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Copying all classes into the master device has drawbacks for hybrid devices
(devices that are both mice and keyboards). If such a device posts an event,
it's key classes are moved into the VCP. The key event itself is unaffected
by keyboard grabs and the like.
Partial class copying copies depending on the event and copies the classes
into the right master device (i.e. the VCK for key events, the VCP for
pointer events).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
There's no need for internal events to be a struct with a single nested
union, we might as well make the union itself the InternalEvent.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
isMaster is not enough as long as we differ between master pointers and
keyboard. With flexible device classes, the usual checks for whether a
master device is a pointer (currently check for ->button, ->valuators or
->key) do not work as an SD may post an event through a master and mess this
check up.
Example, a device with valuators but no buttons would remove the button
class from the VCP and thus result in the
IsPointerDevice(inputInfo.pointer) == FALSE.
This will become worse in the future when new device classes are introduced
that aren't provided in the current system (e.g. a switch class).
This patch replaces isMaster with "type", one of SLAVE, MASTER_POINTER and
MASTER_KEYBOARD. All checks for dev->isMaster are replaced with an
IsMaster(dev).
dev->u.lastSlave was not signal safe since it was accessed by the DIX and
during signal handling.
Replaced with:
'dev->last.slave' for the signal handler's lastSlave (used to generate
DeviceChangedEvents), .
'dev->u.lastSlave' for the DIX lastSlave (currently only used in
change_modmap)
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This type is only used in XI to give a hint of what type this device may be.
Call it xinput_type for clarity.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This approach is broken anyway. DIPT only checked for the XInput type
"MOUSE" and the only user of this is xf86ActivateDevice when it sets the
Activate/DeactivateGrab functions.
Since synaptics and wacom set their own types, evdev only sets MOUSE for,
well, mice half the devices didn't have this set correctly anyway.
Instead, ActivatePointerGrab should be merged together with
ActivateKeyboardGrab.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Buttons append 4-byte units to the end of the reply, they need to be
included too.
Reported-by: Mark Dokter
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Both values need to fail the request, so we need to check them before
looping through the modifier masks. Otherwise, a wrong grab_window will
show up in each failed modifier return but not actually cause an error.
There's only two reasons for hierarchy events:
- device is added, removed, etc. In this case we want to send the event as
it happens.
- devices are added in a XIChangeDeviceHierarchy request. In this case we
only want one event cumulating all changes.
Rather than have one field per hierarchy change, XI2 has two fields - one
generic one and one per-device that include the device-specific flags.
This requires some funky handling for removed devices, but oh well.
This wrong check may cause BadLength to be returned to the client even if the
length is correct.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This wrong check may cause BadLength to be returned to the client even if the
length is correct.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Key events may change the modifier state, so we need to get the prev_state for
those (i.e. without the changes by the event already applied).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
A XTest virtual slave device pair (kbd/ptr) exists for every master
device pair. This is so XTest events are correctly propogated via slave
devices up to Master devices and the classes are correctly changed along
the way. We add the XTest slave device pair to the Virtual Core pointer
and provide a simple way of creating the devices.
A XTest Slave Device is identified by the XTstDevicePrivateKey property
being set in the devices devProperties
XI events are still propagated through the matching device, in the hope the
client knows what it is doing.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Allocating a slave device is essentially the same as allocating a master device.
Hence we rename AllocMaster to AllocDevicePair and provided the ability to
indicate if a master or slave device pair is required.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Some keyboards (?) advertise more than MAX_VALUATORS axes. Parts of the
internal event delivery relies on not having more than MAX_VALUATOR axes, so
let's cap it down.
If there's real devices that require more than the current 36, I'm sure we can
bump this up.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Some keyboards (?) advertise more than MAX_VALUATORS axes. Parts of the
internal event delivery relies on not having more than MAX_VALUATOR axes, so
let's cap it down.
If there's real devices that require more than the current 36, I'm sure we can
bump this up.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Virtually all callers use
XkbGetRulesDefault(&rmlvo);
InitKeyboardDeviceStruct(..., rmlvo);
Let's save them the trouble and accept NULL as a hint to take the
default RMLVO.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Benjamin Close <Benjamin.Close@clearchain.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Yes, this means we have even more arguments to GrabDevice. But it beats having
a copy of most but not all of GrabDevice in ProcGrabPointer.
Also, reshuffle the order of parameters, the CARD* status is a return value
and should be last.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
