XkbRemoveResourceClient() returns immediately if dev->key is NULL.
CloseDevice calls XkbRemoveResourceClient until it removes all resources.
If we free dev->key and NULL it before XkbRemoveResourceClient, then
infinite loop ensues, and the server appears to hang on exit or crash.
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@sun.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
NewInputDeviceRequest (and RemoveDevice) have checks in place to not allow
removal of the VCP/VCK. When shutting down, they need to be cleaned up
nonetheless to free the memory associated.
X.Org Bug 25028 <http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25028>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
The "counterpart to biggest hack" included checking for the motion history
function - which is unified in 1.7. Hence the check (which is already
removed) would evaluate to true anyway, and this comment isn't needed.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
InitValuatorClassDeviceStruct always initializes with the default profile.
The default profile allocs data and adds a few properties which become
obsolete if the profile is changed lateron by the driver.
The property handlers are stored in the device's devPrivates and cleaned up.
Ideally, the property handler ID's could be stored somewhere more obvious,
but that seems to require breaking the ABI.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Simon Thum <simon.thum@gmx.de>
Currently the XTEST device is limited to the same number of buttons the core
device has. This breaks if a user has a mouse with more than 3 buttons
connected and is using a core client to fake button 8+ presses.
Rather than expecting all clients to fix themselves, just increase the
default number of buttons to 10, which is somewhat a compromise. Ideally,
the XTEST devices should adjust themselves to the highest number of buttons
available on the slave devices (like the master pointers already do), but
that's a taks for another day.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
libX11 ModMap.c believes that GetModifierMapping can never return an error
Xserver devices.c believes that GetModifierMapping can return an error if
the ModMap couldn't be generated
According to the protocol document I have, libX11 is right, so adjust the
server to send back an empty modmap if one couldn't be made...
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24621
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Instead of returning BadAccess when "read" permission is denied
on a device, falsify the device state (buttons down, keys pressed).
This is nicer to applications, but may still have undesired side
effects. The long-term solution is not to use these requests in
event-driven code!
Requests affected: QueryPointer, QueryKeymap, XiQueryDevice.
Signed-off-by: Eamon Walsh <ewalsh@tycho.nsa.gov>
Now that all event queues hold internal events only, they never need
to be resized. Resizing them led to memory corruption as they would
get sized for an appropriate xEvent, not an internal event.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
AlwaysCore and SendCoreEvents specify whether a device is to send core
events. A device that has either disabled is not supposed to send core
events.
With MPX/XI2, a device that is attached automatically sends core events when
the event is routed through the master device. Floating a slave device
disables core events by breaking the route.
This patch automatically floats devices that have coreEvents disabled in the
xorg.conf/HAL. This replicates the behaviour of a SendCoreEvents "false"
device in server 1.6 and earlier.
The devices may still be reattached to a master at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
In theory, the MD should change back to its old, original classes when the
last SD is detached. Thanks to the XTEST devices, we'll always have an SD
attached until the MD is removed. So let's not worry about that and do
nothing instead of having some code that's essentially untested.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This patch corrects a misnaming of XTest-related functions.
The extension itself announces itself as XTEST. Xtst is the library name
itself, but all library functions are prefixed by XTest. Same with the
naming in the server.
- Rename all *Xtst* functions to *XTest* for consistency with the library
and in-server API.
- Rename the "Xtst device" property to "XTEST device" for consistency with
the extension naming.
- Rename the device naming to "<master device name> XTEST device". The
default xtest devices become "Virtual core XTEST pointer" and "Virtual
core XTEST keyboard".
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The extern declaration in xichangehierarchy.c was broken anyway.
This fixes a crash on creating a new master device.
Reported-by: Maxim Levitsky
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
PointerWindows[x] would be set after removing a master pointer. Destroying
this window then crashed the server.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
InternalEvents shouldn't be used anywhere outside the X server itself. Split
up into events.h for opaque typedefs for the events needed by various
headers and eventstr.h for the actual struct definitions.
eventstr.h must only be included by code that requires internal events and
is not part of the SDK.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The code that didn't list attached slave devices for XI1 clients doesn't
exist anymore, so there's no need for these presence events.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Master devices must have the standard button map applied for all buttons to
ensure buttons larger than 7 (the default for MDs) are mapped appropriately.
We can't copy the button map from SDs to MDs since that breaks the chained
button mapping. However, by ensuring all buttons (even non-existing ones)
are mapped, devices that send such buttons continue to work.
X.Org Bug 22594 <http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22594>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Xtst devices get this property assigned automatically so they can be
detected easily by a client.
The property is read-only.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Rather than storing a simple boolean in the devPrivate for XTest devices,
store the actual master device's id (since it is constant for the life of
the device anyway).
Callers should use GetXtstDevice now instead of digging around in the
devPrivates themselves.
This patch allows for a cleanup in the creation of new master devices since
GetMaster and GetXtstDevice spare the need for loops, IsPointer checks and
similar.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Benjamin Close <Benjamin.Close@clearchain.com>
The callers should need to use the dev privates key to look up xtest
devices.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Benjamin Close <Benjamin.Close@clearchain.com>
Master devices provide the union of all attached slave devices' buttons,
i.e. the number of buttons on the master device is always the number of
buttons of the slave device with the highest number of buttons. When slaves
are attached or detached, the master device adjusts the button number to
reflect the new buttons.
On a slave switch, this slave's button labels are copied into the master (up
to slave->num_buttons). The remaining button labels (if any) stay as they
are. Thus, if any of the higher buttons is still pressed, it reflects the
label of the last pressed device that provided this button.
If two devices press the same button and it is differently labelled the last
pressed one will be reflected in the master device.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
MD's will soon be the union of all devices anyway. XTest pointers are only
for the core protocol XTest stuff, so 7 buttons (lmr + 4 wheel buttons)
should do.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Note: ABI break, but ABI_XINPUT_VERSION has NOT been bumped. Recompile input
drivers.
Revert "Xi: return BadImplementation for deviceids 256 and above"
This reverts commit 2b459f44f3.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Some files (notably those merged with MPX before XI2 came along) didn't use
a 'xi' prefix. This patch changes all of them to meaningful names.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Copying all classes into the master device has drawbacks for hybrid devices
(devices that are both mice and keyboards). If such a device posts an event,
it's key classes are moved into the VCP. The key event itself is unaffected
by keyboard grabs and the like.
Partial class copying copies depending on the event and copies the classes
into the right master device (i.e. the VCK for key events, the VCP for
pointer events).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
For hybrid devices (keys + buttons/axes) the attached master device is
generally the wrong one. One shouldn't post a button event through a
keyboard and vice versa.
GetMaster(dev) returns the right master device for the given type needed.
This may be the MD paired with this device's MD.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
isMaster is not enough as long as we differ between master pointers and
keyboard. With flexible device classes, the usual checks for whether a
master device is a pointer (currently check for ->button, ->valuators or
->key) do not work as an SD may post an event through a master and mess this
check up.
Example, a device with valuators but no buttons would remove the button
class from the VCP and thus result in the
IsPointerDevice(inputInfo.pointer) == FALSE.
This will become worse in the future when new device classes are introduced
that aren't provided in the current system (e.g. a switch class).
This patch replaces isMaster with "type", one of SLAVE, MASTER_POINTER and
MASTER_KEYBOARD. All checks for dev->isMaster are replaced with an
IsMaster(dev).
dev->u.lastSlave was not signal safe since it was accessed by the DIX and
during signal handling.
Replaced with:
'dev->last.slave' for the signal handler's lastSlave (used to generate
DeviceChangedEvents), .
'dev->u.lastSlave' for the DIX lastSlave (currently only used in
change_modmap)
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
There's only two reasons for hierarchy events:
- device is added, removed, etc. In this case we want to send the event as
it happens.
- devices are added in a XIChangeDeviceHierarchy request. In this case we
only want one event cumulating all changes.
Rather than have one field per hierarchy change, XI2 has two fields - one
generic one and one per-device that include the device-specific flags.
This requires some funky handling for removed devices, but oh well.
Xephyr doesn't manually set Activate/DeactivateGrab for new devices,
resulting in a NULL-pointer dereference later when a grab is activated.
Avoid the segfault by ensuring that the pointer is always valid.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
A XTest virtual slave device pair (kbd/ptr) exists for every master
device pair. This is so XTest events are correctly propogated via slave
devices up to Master devices and the classes are correctly changed along
the way. We add the XTest slave device pair to the Virtual Core pointer
and provide a simple way of creating the devices.
A XTest Slave Device is identified by the XTstDevicePrivateKey property
being set in the devices devProperties
XI events are still propagated through the matching device, in the hope the
client knows what it is doing.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Allocating a slave device is essentially the same as allocating a master device.
Hence we rename AllocMaster to AllocDevicePair and provided the ability to
indicate if a master or slave device pair is required.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Some keyboards (?) advertise more than MAX_VALUATORS axes. Parts of the
internal event delivery relies on not having more than MAX_VALUATOR axes, so
let's cap it down.
If there's real devices that require more than the current 36, I'm sure we can
bump this up.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Some keyboards (?) advertise more than MAX_VALUATORS axes. Parts of the
internal event delivery relies on not having more than MAX_VALUATOR axes, so
let's cap it down.
If there's real devices that require more than the current 36, I'm sure we can
bump this up.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
