When using autoconf/automake to build Xwayland, the actual path to
Xwayland is not fully qualified and refers to the "exec_prefix".
As a result, the path provided by the generated pkg-config file is wrong
when using autoconf to build the Xserver.
Fix the xwayland.pc file to also set the variable "prefix" and
"exec_prefix" so that the path to Xwayland is fully resolved.
Add those variables to the meson build as well for good measure.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
Since commit 20c78f38, we use the relative pointer for enter/leave
events.
However, sprite_check_lost_focus() which verifies whether the pointer has
left an Xwayland surface still explicitly check for the absolute
pointer.
As a result, no LeaveNotify event is emitted anymore now when the
pointer crosses from an Xwayland surface to a Wayland native one.
Make sure to check the last slave device against get_pointer_event() as
well, not just the absolute pointer.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@mupuf.org>
Acked-by: Roman Gilg <subdiff@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Roman Gilg <subdiff@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Fixes: 20c78f38 - xwayland: use get_pointer_device() for enter/leave
handling too
The code path added by commit 69e4b8e6 (xfree86: attempt to autoconfig
gpu slave devices (v3)) assumes that it will only be run if the primary
device on the screen is the first device in xf86configptr->conf_device_lst.
While this is true most of the time, there are two specific cases where
this assumption fails.
First, if the first device in conf_device_lst is assigned to a different
seat than the running X server, it will be skipped by the previous
FIND_SUITABLE macro usage. Second, if the primary device was explicitly
assigned to the screen but auto_gpu_device is still set and no secondary
devices were explicitly listed, that device may not be the first device
in conf_device_lst.
When the first device in conf_device_lst is not the primary device
assigned to the screen, two problems emerge. First, the first device in
conf_device_lst will never be assigned to the screen as a secondary
device. Second, the primary device is additionally assigned to the
screen as a secondary device. The combination of these problems causes
certain otherwise valid configurations to be invalid. For example, if a
primary device is assigned to a screen and a secondary device is listed
in the config but not explicitly assigned to the screen, then one order
of the device sections results in a usable PRIME or Reverse PRIME setup
and the other order does not.
This commit removes the assumption that the primary device is the first
device in conf_device_lst by starting the loop from the start of
conf_device_lst and skipping the primary device when it is encountered.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Cherry <jcherry@nvidia.com>
Xwayland won't emulate XWarpPointer requests if the cursor is visible,
this is to avoid having the cursor jumping on screen and preventing
random X11 clients from controlling the pointer in Wayland, while
allowing games which use that mechanism with a hidden cursor to work in
Xwayland.
There are, however, games which tend to do it in the wrong order, i.e.
show the cursor before moving the pointer, and because Xwayland will not
allow an X11 client to move the pointer while the cursor is visible, the
requests will fail.
Add a workaround for such X11 clients, when the cursor is being shown,
keep it invisible until the cursor is actually moved. This way, X11
clients which show their cursor just before moving it would still have a
chance to succeed.
v2: Add a timeout to show the cursor for well behaved clients.
v3: Some cleanup (Michel)
v4: Do not cancel cursor delay when updating the cursor to avoid
delaying cursor visibility indefinitely if the client keeps
settings different cursors (Michel)
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jaap Buurman jaapbuurman@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/734
A change during the 1.20 development cycle resulted in fbconfigs being walked
and deallocated individually during __glXScreenDestroy. This change
now avoids a use-after-free caused by that change.
==50859==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x00010d3819c8 at pc 0x0001009d4230 bp 0x00016feca7a0 sp 0x00016feca798
READ of size 8 at 0x00010d3819c8 thread T5
#0 0x1009d422c in __glXScreenDestroy glxscreens.c:448
#1 0x10091cc98 in __glXAquaScreenDestroy indirect.c:510
#2 0x1009d2734 in glxCloseScreen glxscreens.c:169
#3 0x100740a24 in dix_main main.c:325
#4 0x10023ed50 in server_thread quartzStartup.c:65
#5 0x199ae7fd0 in _pthread_start+0x13c (libsystem_pthread.dylib:arm64e+0x6fd0)
#6 0x199ae2d38 in thread_start+0x4 (libsystem_pthread.dylib:arm64e+0x1d38)
0x00010d3819c8 is located 200 bytes inside of 12800-byte region [0x00010d381900,0x00010d384b00)
freed by thread T5 here:
#0 0x101477ba8 in wrap_free+0x98 (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:arm64e+0x3fba8)
#1 0x1009d4240 in __glXScreenDestroy glxscreens.c:449
#2 0x10091cc98 in __glXAquaScreenDestroy indirect.c:510
#3 0x1009d2734 in glxCloseScreen glxscreens.c:169
#4 0x100740a24 in dix_main main.c:325
#5 0x10023ed50 in server_thread quartzStartup.c:65
#6 0x199ae7fd0 in _pthread_start+0x13c (libsystem_pthread.dylib:arm64e+0x6fd0)
#7 0x199ae2d38 in thread_start+0x4 (libsystem_pthread.dylib:arm64e+0x1d38)
previously allocated by thread T5 here:
#0 0x101477e38 in wrap_calloc+0x9c (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:arm64e+0x3fe38)
#1 0x100925a40 in __glXAquaCreateVisualConfigs visualConfigs.c:116
#2 0x10091cb24 in __glXAquaScreenProbe+0x224 (X11.bin:arm64+0x100730b24)
#3 0x1009cd840 in xorgGlxServerInit glxext.c:528
#4 0x10074539c in _CallCallbacks dixutils.c:743
#5 0x100932a70 in CallCallbacks callback.h:83
#6 0x100932478 in GlxExtensionInit vndext.c:244
#7 0x10020a364 in InitExtensions miinitext.c:267
#8 0x10073fe7c in dix_main main.c:197
#9 0x10023ed50 in server_thread quartzStartup.c:65
#10 0x199ae7fd0 in _pthread_start+0x13c (libsystem_pthread.dylib:arm64e+0x6fd0)
#11 0x199ae2d38 in thread_start+0x4 (libsystem_pthread.dylib:arm64e+0x1d38)
Regressed-in: 4b0a3cbab1
CC: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <jeremyhu@apple.com>
It violates @autoreleasepool best practices, and this helps collapse quartzCocoa.m into quartz.c
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <jeremyhu@apple.com>
There is a place where this code was called on the main thread.
We're using a rather nasty anti-pattern to just call a block inline rather
than synchonously calling it on the main thread if we're already on the main
thread. This code could use a good overhaul, but I don't have time to rip
it apart right now. This will address the immediate issue.
Fixes: https://github.com/XQuartz/XQuartz/issues/40
Fixes: https://github.com/XQuartz/XQuartz/issues/48
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <jeremyhu@apple.com>
This fixes an problem left in f682e0563f
due to an incorrect cherry-pick.
We must use old listener->listener to deliver the touch event. Otherwise
grab won't let the event through and the abovementioned commit has no
effect.
Signed-off-by: Povilas Kanapickas <povilas@radix.lt>
In Weston, clicking the window decoration of an Xwayland client gives us a
wl_pointer.button event immediately followed by a wl_pointer.leave event.
The leave event does not contain any button state information, so the button
remains logically down in the DIX.
Once the pointer button is released, a wl_pointer.enter event is sent with
the current button state (zero). This needs to trigger a ButtonRelease event
but for that we need to ensure that the device is the same as the one we send
ButtonPress events through.
Fixes a regression introduced in a4095162ca.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Trying to change the pointer control settings on a device without
PtrFeedbackPtr would be a bug and a crash in the Xserver.
Guard against that case by returning early with a BadImplementation
error, that might kill the X11 client but the Xserver would survive.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Related: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1137
Trying to change the acceleration/threshold on Xwayland cannot work, and
the corresponding handler xwl_pointer_control() is a no-op.
Yet, an X11 client trying to change those on the touch device may
possibly cause a crash because the touch device in Xwayland doesn't set
that.
Initialize the touch device's PtrFeedback to make sure that just cannot
happen.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1137
We are using the relative pointer for motion events, but buttons and
axis events still go through the absolute pointer device.
That means additional DeviceChanged events that could be avoided if the
buttons and axis events were coming from the same device as motion
events.
Route those events to the relative pointer if available so that motion,
buttons and axis events come from the same device (most of the time).
Suggested-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Related: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1130
The relative pointer only has 2 axis, if we want to route the mouse
wheel events to that device, we need to add the axis definition, similar
to what is done for the absolute pointer.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Related: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1130
This is a cleanup patch, no functional change.
Split the function dispatch_pointer_motion_event() into three separate
simpler functions, relative motion with a warp emulator, relative motion
and absolute motion.
This makes the code a lot easier to read for me, rather than having
everything in a single function with nested if/else conditions.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Xwayland supports relative motion events from the Wayland compositor via
the relative-pointer protocol, and converts those to the absolute range
in device units for raw events.
Some X11 clients however wrongly assume relative values in the axis
values even for devices explicitly labeled as absolute. While this is a
bug in the client, such applications would work fine in plain Xorg but
not with Xwayland.
To avoid that issue, use the relative values for raw events without
conversion, so that such application continue to work in Xwayland.
Thanks Peter for figuring out the root cause.
v2: Don't duplicate relative and absolute events (Peter)
v3: Use POINTER_RAWONLY (Peter)
Suggested-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1130
This add a new flag POINTER_RAWONLY for GetPointerEvents() which does
pretty much the opposite of POINTER_NORAW.
Basically, this tells GetPointerEvents() that we only want the
DeviceChanged events and any raw events for this motion but no actual
motion events.
This is preliminary work for Xwayland to be able to use relative motion
events for raw events. Xwayland would use absolute events for raw
events, but some X11 clients (wrongly) assume raw events to be always
relative.
To allow such clients to work with Xwayland, it needs to switch to
relative raw events (if those are available from the Wayland
compositor).
However, Xwayland cannot use relative motion events for actual pointer
location because that would cause a drift over time, the pointer being
actually controlled by the Wayland compositor.
So Xwayland needs to be able to send only relative raw events, hence
this API.
Bump the ABI_XINPUT_VERSION minor version to reflect that API addition.
v2: Actually avoid sending motion events (Peter)
v3: Keep sending raw emulated events with RAWONLY (Peter)
Suggested-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Related: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1130
Delivery of emulated events usually happens only to the owning client.
If there are grabs, only the grabbing client may receive these events.
This logic does not work during the touch event replay in
DeactivatePointerGrab(), as the previous grab is no longer in the
listener queue of the touch, so the next owner gets whole emulated event
sequence. This may trigger implicit grabs. After replay,
DeactivatePointerGrab() will update the global grab without regard to
this new implicit grab, which leads to issues down the line.
This change is effectively the same as 35e5a76cc1 except that the change
is limited to only emulated pointer events. Otherwise, in the case of a
device grab we end up not sending any touch events to clients that
selected XI_TouchOwnership event and should get touch events before they
get ownership of touch sequence.
Fixes#7https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96536
If a XI2 client started listening to touches due to a selection and then
creates an active async grab that does not include touch events, then it
currently won't get the touch end event which will produce inconsistent
view of the pending touches.
Note that we only need to consider touch listeners and can ignore
pointer emulation. Under XI2 if a active grab replaces a passive
implicit grab and the active grab does not include the button release
event, the client won't get it either.
When an X11 client issues an active grab on the keyboard, Xwayland
forward this to the Wayland compositor using the Xwayland specific
protocol "xwayland-keyboard-grab" if it can find the corresponding
Xwayland window.
Some X11 clients (typically older games) however try to issue the
keyboard grab on the X11 root window, which has obviously no matching
Xwayland window. In such a case, the grab is simply ignored and the game
will not work as expected.
To workaround that issue, if an X11 client issues a keyboard grab on the
root window, Xwayland will search for a toplevel window belonging to the
same X11 client that it can use as the grab window instead.
This way, the grab can be forwarded to the Wayland compositor that can
either grant or deny the request based on the window and its internal
policies.
The heuristic picks the first realized toplevel window belonging to the
client so that the Wayland compositor will send it the keyboard events,
and the Xserver grab mechanism will then take care of routing the events
to the expected X11 window by itself.
v2: Make the test more clear (Dor Askayo <dor.askayo@gmail.com>)
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
See-also: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1249
Olivier Fourdan
Jacob Cherry
Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
Povilas Kanapickas
Peter Hutterer