andreacavalli/netty5
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

typo

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Trustin Lee 2009-04-06 09:16:02 +00:00
parent 5c97c7fd1c
commit 138e521b22
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
src/docbook/module/architecture.xml
View File

@ -52,10 +52,10 @@
+--------+----------+</programlisting> +--------+----------+</programlisting>
<para> <para>
If <classname>ByteBuffer</classname> were used, you would have to If <classname>ByteBuffer</classname> were used, you would have to
create a new big buffer and copy the three parts into the new create a new big buffer and copy the two parts into the new
buffer. Alternatively, you can perform a gathering write operation buffer. Alternatively, you can perform a gathering write operation
in NIO, but it restricts you to represent the composite of buffers in NIO, but it restricts you to represent the composite of buffers
as an array of <classname>ByteBuffer</classname> rather than a as an array of <classname>ByteBuffer</classname>s rather than a
single <classname>ByteBuffer</classname>, breaking the abstraction and single <classname>ByteBuffer</classname>, breaking the abstraction and
introducing complicated state management. Moreover, it's of no use if introducing complicated state management. Moreover, it's of no use if
you are not going to read or write from an NIO channel. you are not going to read or write from an NIO channel.