Commit Graph

322 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dmitriy Dumanskiy
b72fea340b Improve DateFormatter parsing performance (#8821)
Motivation:

Just was looking through code and found 1 interesting place DateFormatter.tryParseMonth that was not very effective, so I decided to optimize it a bit.

Modification:

Changed DateFormatter.tryParseMonth method. Instead of invocation regionMatch() for every month - compare chars one by one.

Result:

DateFormatter.parseHttpDate method performance improved from ~3% to ~15%.

Benchmark                                                                (DATE_STRING)   Mode  Cnt        Score       Error  Units
DateFormatter2Benchmark.parseHttpHeaderDateFormatter     Sun, 27 Jan 2016 19:18:46 GMT  thrpt    6  4142781.221 ± 82155.002  ops/s
DateFormatter2Benchmark.parseHttpHeaderDateFormatter     Sun, 27 Dec 2016 19:18:46 GMT  thrpt    6  3781810.558 ± 38679.061  ops/s
DateFormatter2Benchmark.parseHttpHeaderDateFormatterNew  Sun, 27 Jan 2016 19:18:46 GMT  thrpt    6  4372569.705 ± 30257.537  ops/s
DateFormatter2Benchmark.parseHttpHeaderDateFormatterNew  Sun, 27 Dec 2016 19:18:46 GMT  thrpt    6  4339785.100 ± 57542.660  ops/s
2019-02-04 10:04:20 +01:00
Norman Maurer
cd3254df88
Update to new checkstyle plugin (#8777) (#8780)
Motivation:

We need to update to a new checkstyle plugin to allow the usage of lambdas.

Modifications:

- Update to new plugin version.
- Fix checkstyle problems.

Result:

Be able to use checkstyle plugin which supports new Java syntax.
2019-01-25 11:58:42 +01:00
root
cf03ed0478 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2019-01-21 12:26:44 +00:00
root
37484635cb [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.33.Final 2019-01-21 12:26:12 +00:00
Francesco Nigro
b8a3394f9b Adding an execute burst cost benchmark for Netty executors (#8594)
Motivation:

Netty executors doesn't have yet any means to compare with each others
nor to compare with the j.u.c. executors

Modifications:

A new benchmark measuring execute burst cost is being added

Result:

It's now possible to compare some of Netty executors with each others
and with the j.u.c. executors
2018-12-04 15:46:25 +01:00
root
8eb313072e [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2018-11-29 11:15:09 +00:00
root
afcb4a37d3 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.32.Final 2018-11-29 11:14:20 +00:00
Nick Hill
10539f4dc7 Streamline CompositeByteBuf internals (#8437)
Motivation:

CompositeByteBuf is a powerful and versatile abstraction, allowing for
manipulation of large data without copying bytes. There is still a
non-negligible cost to reading/writing however relative to "singular"
ByteBufs, and this can be mostly eliminated with some rework of the
internals.

My use case is message modification/transformation while zero-copy
proxying. For example replacing a string within a large message with one
of a different length

Modifications:

- No longer slice added buffers and unwrap added slices
   - Components store target buf offset relative to position in
composite buf
   - Less allocations, object footprint, pointer indirection, offset
arithmetic
- Use Component[] rather than ArrayList<Component>
   - Avoid pointer indirection and duplicate bounds check, more
efficient backing array growth
   - Facilitates optimization when doing bulk-inserts - inserting n
ByteBufs behind m is now O(m + n) instead of O(mn)
- Avoid unnecessary casting and method call indirection via superclass
- Eliminate some duplicate range/ref checks via non-checking versions of
toComponentIndex and findComponent
- Add simple fast-path for toComponentIndex(0); add racy cache of
last-accessed Component to findComponent(int)
- Override forEachByte0(...) and forEachByteDesc0(...) methods
- Make use of RecyclableArrayList in nioBuffers(int, int) (in line with
FasterCompositeByteBuf impl)
- Modify addComponents0(boolean,int,Iterable) to use the Iterable
directly rather than copy to an array first (and possibly to an
ArrayList before that)
- Optimize addComponents0(boolean,int,ByteBuf[],int) to not perform
repeated array insertions and avoid second loop for offset updates
- Simplify other logic in various places, in particular the general
pattern used where a sub-range is iterated over
- Add benchmarks to demonstrate some improvements

While refactoring I also came across a couple of clear bugs. They are
fixed in these changes but I will open another PR with unit tests and
fixes to the current version.

Result:

Much faster creation, manipulation, and access; many fewer allocations
and smaller footprint. Benchmark results to follow.
2018-11-03 10:37:07 +01:00
root
3e7ddb36c7 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2018-10-29 15:38:51 +00:00
root
9e50739601 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.31.Final 2018-10-29 15:37:47 +00:00
Nick Hill
583d838f7c Optimize AbstractByteBuf.getCharSequence() in US_ASCII case (#8392)
* Optimize AbstractByteBuf.getCharSequence() in US_ASCII case

Motivation:

Inspired by https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/8388, I noticed this
simple optimization to avoid char[] allocation (also suggested in a TODO
here).

Modifications:

Return an AsciiString from AbstractByteBuf.getCharSequence() if
requested charset is US_ASCII or ISO_8859_1 (latter thanks to
@Scottmitch's suggestion). Also tweak unit tests not to require Strings
and include a new benchmark to demonstrate the speedup.

Result:

Speed-up of AbstractByteBuf.getCharSequence() in ascii and iso 8859/1
cases
2018-10-26 15:32:38 -07:00
Norman Maurer
87ec2f882a
Reduce overhead by ByteBufUtil.decodeString(...) which is used by AbstractByteBuf.toString(...) and AbstractByteBuf.getCharSequence(...) (#8388)
Motivation:

Our current implementation that is used for toString(Charset) operations on AbstractByteBuf implementation is quite slow as it does a lot of uncessary memory copies. We should just use new String(...) as it has a lot of optimizations to handle these cases.

Modifications:

Rewrite ByteBufUtil.decodeString(...) to use new String(...)

Result:

Less overhead for toString(Charset) operations.

Benchmark                                         (charsetName)  (direct)  (size)   Mode  Cnt         Score         Error  Units
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeString          US-ASCII     false       8  thrpt   20  22401645.093 ? 4671452.479  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeString          US-ASCII     false      64  thrpt   20  23678483.384 ? 3749164.446  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeString          US-ASCII      true       8  thrpt   20  15731142.651 ? 3782931.591  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeString          US-ASCII      true      64  thrpt   20  16244232.229 ? 1886259.658  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeString             UTF-8     false       8  thrpt   20  25983680.959 ? 5045782.289  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeString             UTF-8     false      64  thrpt   20  26235589.339 ? 2867004.950  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeString             UTF-8      true       8  thrpt   20  18499027.808 ? 4784684.268  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeString             UTF-8      true      64  thrpt   20  16825286.141 ? 1008712.342  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeString            UTF-16     false       8  thrpt   20   5789879.092 ? 1201786.359  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeString            UTF-16     false      64  thrpt   20   2173243.225 ?  417809.341  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeString            UTF-16      true       8  thrpt   20   5035583.011 ? 1001978.854  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeString            UTF-16      true      64  thrpt   20   2162345.301 ?  402410.408  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeString        ISO-8859-1     false       8  thrpt   20  30039052.376 ? 6539111.622  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeString        ISO-8859-1     false      64  thrpt   20  31414163.515 ? 2096710.526  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeString        ISO-8859-1      true       8  thrpt   20  19538587.855 ? 4639115.572  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeString        ISO-8859-1      true      64  thrpt   20  19467839.722 ? 1672687.213  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeStringOld       US-ASCII     false       8  thrpt   20  10787326.745 ? 1034197.864  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeStringOld       US-ASCII     false      64  thrpt   20   7129801.930 ? 1363019.209  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeStringOld       US-ASCII      true       8  thrpt   20   9002529.605 ? 2017642.445  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeStringOld       US-ASCII      true      64  thrpt   20   3860192.352 ?  826218.738  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeStringOld          UTF-8     false       8  thrpt   20  10532838.027 ? 2151743.968  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeStringOld          UTF-8     false      64  thrpt   20   7185554.597 ? 1387685.785  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeStringOld          UTF-8      true       8  thrpt   20   7352253.316 ? 1333823.850  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeStringOld          UTF-8      true      64  thrpt   20   2825578.707 ?  349701.156  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeStringOld         UTF-16     false       8  thrpt   20   7277446.665 ? 1447034.346  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeStringOld         UTF-16     false      64  thrpt   20   2445929.579 ?  562816.641  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeStringOld         UTF-16      true       8  thrpt   20   6201174.401 ? 1236137.786  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeStringOld         UTF-16      true      64  thrpt   20   2310674.973 ?  525587.959  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeStringOld     ISO-8859-1     false       8  thrpt   20  11142625.392 ? 1680556.468  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeStringOld     ISO-8859-1     false      64  thrpt   20   8127116.405 ? 1128513.860  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeStringOld     ISO-8859-1      true       8  thrpt   20   9405751.952 ? 2193324.806  ops/s
ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.decodeStringOld     ISO-8859-1      true      64  thrpt   20   3943282.076 ?  737798.070  ops/s

Benchmark result is saved to /home/norman/mainframer/netty/microbench/target/reports/performance/ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark.json
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1,030.173 sec - in io.netty.buffer.ByteBufUtilDecodeStringBenchmark
[1030.460s][info   ][gc,heap,exit ] Heap
[1030.460s][info   ][gc,heap,exit ]  garbage-first heap   total 516096K, used 257918K [0x0000000609a00000, 0x0000000800000000)
[1030.460s][info   ][gc,heap,exit ]   region size 2048K, 127 young (260096K), 2 survivors (4096K)
[1030.460s][info   ][gc,heap,exit ]  Metaspace       used 17123K, capacity 17438K, committed 17792K, reserved 1064960K
[1030.460s][info   ][gc,heap,exit ]   class space    used 1709K, capacity 1827K, committed 1920K, reserved 1048576K
2018-10-19 14:00:13 +02:00
root
2d7cb47edd [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2018-09-27 19:00:45 +00:00
root
3a9ac829d5 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.30.Final 2018-09-27 18:56:12 +00:00
Norman Maurer
e542a2cf26
Use a non-volatile read for ensureAccessible() whenever possible to reduce overhead and allow better inlining. (#8266)
Motiviation:

At the moment whenever ensureAccessible() is called in our ByteBuf implementations (which is basically on each operation) we will do a volatile read. That per-se is not such a bad thing but the problem here is that it will also reduce the the optimizations that the compiler / jit can do. For example as these are volatile it can not eliminate multiple loads of it when inline the methods of ByteBuf which happens quite frequently because most of them a quite small and very hot. That is especially true for all the methods that act on primitives.

It gets even worse as people often call a lot of these after each other in the same method or even use method chaining here.

The idea of the change is basically just ue a non-volatile read for the ensureAccessible() check as its a best-effort implementation to detect acting on already released buffers anyway as even with a volatile read it could happen that the user will release it in another thread before we actual access the buffer after the reference check.

Modifications:

- Try to do a non-volatile read using sun.misc.Unsafe if we can use it.
- Add a benchmark

Result:

Big performance win when multiple ByteBuf methods are called from a method.

With the change:
UnsafeByteBufBenchmark.setGetLongUnsafeByteBuf  thrpt   20  281395842,128 ± 5050792,296  ops/s

Before the change:
UnsafeByteBufBenchmark.setGetLongUnsafeByteBuf  thrpt   20  217419832,801 ± 5080579,030  ops/s
2018-09-07 07:47:02 +02:00
Norman Maurer
052c2fbefe
Update to jmh 1.2.1 (#8270)
Motivation:

We should use the latest jmh version which also supports -prof dtraceasm on MacOS.

Modifications:

Update to latest jmh version.

Result:

Better benchmark / profiling support on MacOS.
2018-09-06 22:31:52 +02:00
Norman Maurer
02d559e6a4
Remove flags when running benchmarks. (#8262)
Motivation:

Some of the flags we used are not supported anymore on more recent JDK versions. We should just remove all of them and only keep what we really need. This may also reflect better what people use in production.

Modifications:

Remove some flags when running the benchmarks.

Result:

Benchmarks also run with JDK11.
2018-09-05 19:05:02 +02:00
Norman Maurer
8635d88d4d
Allow to generate a jmh uber jar to run benchmarks easily from cmdline with different arguments. (#8264)
Motivation:

It is sometimes useful to be able to run benchmarks easily from the commandline and passs different arguments / options here. We should support this.

Modifications:

Add the benchmark-jar profile which allows to generate such an "uber-jar" that can be used directly to run benchmarks as documented at http://openjdk.java.net/projects/code-tools/jmh/.

Result:

More flexible way to run benchmarks.
2018-09-05 18:28:35 +02:00
Carl Mastrangelo
379a56ca49 Add an Epoll benchmark
Motivation:
Optimizing the Epoll channel needs an objective measure of how fast
it is.

Modification:
Add a simple, closed loop,  ping-pong benchmark.

Result:
Benchmark can be used to measure #7816

Initial numbers:

```
Result "io.netty.microbench.channel.epoll.EpollSocketChannelBenchmark.pingPong":
  22614.403 ±(99.9%) 797.263 ops/s [Average]
  (min, avg, max) = (21093.160, 22614.403, 24977.387), stdev = 918.130
  CI (99.9%): [21817.140, 23411.666] (assumes normal distribution)

Benchmark                              Mode  Cnt      Score     Error  Units
EpollSocketChannelBenchmark.pingPong  thrpt   20  22614.403 ± 797.263  ops/s
```
2018-09-04 10:15:15 +02:00
Francesco Nigro
c78be33443 Added configurable ByteBuf bounds checking (#7521)
Motivation:

The JVM isn't always able to hoist out/reduce bounds checking (due to ref counting operations etc etc) hence making it configurable could improve performances for most CPU intensive use cases.

Modifications:

Each AbstractByteBuf bounds check has been tested against a new static final configuration property similar to checkAccessible ie io.netty.buffer.bytebuf.checkBounds.

Result:

Any user could disable ByteBuf bounds checking in order to get extra performances.
2018-09-03 20:33:47 +02:00
root
a580dc7585 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2018-08-24 06:36:33 +00:00
root
3fc789e83f [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.29.Final 2018-08-24 06:36:06 +00:00
root
fcb19cb589 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2018-07-27 04:59:28 +00:00
root
ff785fbe39 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.28.Final 2018-07-27 04:59:06 +00:00
root
b4dbdc2036 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2018-07-11 15:37:40 +00:00
root
1c16519ac8 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.27.Final 2018-07-11 15:37:21 +00:00
root
7bb9e7eafe [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2018-07-10 05:21:24 +00:00
root
8ca5421bd2 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.26.Final 2018-07-10 05:18:13 +00:00
Norman Maurer
83710cb2e1
Replace toArray(new T[size]) with toArray(new T[0]) to eliminate zero-out and allow the VM to optimize. (#8075)
Motivation:

Using toArray(new T[0]) is usually the faster aproach these days. We should use it.

See also https://shipilev.net/blog/2016/arrays-wisdom-ancients/#_conclusion.

Modifications:

Replace toArray(new T[size]) with toArray(new T[0]).

Result:

Faster code.
2018-06-29 07:56:04 +02:00
unknown
4a8d3a274c Including the setup code in the benchmark method to avoid JMH Invocation level hiccups.
Motivation:

The usage of Invocation level for JMH fixture methods (setup/teardown) inccurs in a significant overhead
in the benchmark time (see org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Level documentation).

In the case of CodecInputListBenchmark, benchmarks are far too small (less than 50ns) and the Invocation
level setup offsets the measurement considerably.
On such cases, the recommended fix patch is to include the setup/teardown code in the benchmark method.

Modifications:

Include the setup/teardown code in the relevant benchmark methods.
Remove the setup/teardown methods from the benchmark class.

Result:

We run the entire benchmark 10 times with default parameters we observed:
- ArrayList benchmark affected directly by JMH overhead is now from 15-80% faster.
- CodecList benchmark is now 50% faster than original (even with the setup code being measured).
- Recyclable ArrayList is ~30% slower.
- All benchmarks have significant different means (ANOVA) and medians (Moore)

Mode: Throughput (Higher the better)

Method	              Full params		Factor	    Modified (Median)	Original (Median)
recyclableArrayList	 (elements = 1)		0.615520967	21719082.75	        35285691.2
recyclableArrayList	 (elements = 4)		0.699553431	17149442.76	        24514843.31
arrayList	         (elements = 4)		1.152666631	27120407.18	        23528404.88
codecOutList	     (elements = 1)		1.527275908	67251089.04	        44033359.47
codecOutList	     (elements = 4)		1.596917095	59174088.78	        37055204.03
arrayList	         (elements = 1)		1.878616889	62188238.24	        33103204.06

Environment:
Tests run on a Computational server with CPU: E5-1660-3.3GHZ  (6 cores + HT), 64 GB RAM.
2018-06-21 12:22:13 +02:00
unknown
cb420a9ffc Including the setup code in the benchmark method to avoid JMH Invocation level hiccups.
Motivation:

The usage of Invocation level for JMH fixture methods (setup/teardown) inccurs in a significant impact in
in the benchmark time (see org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Level documentation).

When the benchmark and the setup/teardown is too small (less than a milisecond) the Invocation level might saturate the system with
timestamp requests and iteration synchronizations which introduce artificial latency, throughput, and scalability bottlenecks.

In the HeadersBenchmark, all benchmarks take less than 100ns and the Invocation level setup offsets the measurement considerably.
As fixture methods is defined for the entire class, this overhead also impacts every single benchmark in this class, not only
the ones that use the emptyHttpHeaders object (cleaned in the setup).

The recommended fix patch here is to include the setup/teardown code in the benchmark where the object is used.

Modifications:

Include the setup/teardown code in the relevant benchmark methods.
Remove the setup/teardown method of Invocation level from the benchmark class.

Result:

We run all benchmarks from HeadersBenchmark 10 times with default parameter, we observe:
- Benchmarks that were not directly affected by the fix patch, improved execution time.
    For instance, http2Remove with (exampleHeader = THREE) had its median reported as 2x faster than the original version.
- Benchmarks that had the setup code inserted (eg. http2AddAllFastest) did not suffer a significant punch in the execution time,
as the benchmarks are not dominated by the clear().

Environment:
Tests run on a Computational server with CPU: E5-1660-3.3GHZ  (6 cores + HT), 64 GB RAM.
2018-06-21 12:21:19 +02:00
Norman Maurer
64bb279f47 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2018-05-14 11:11:45 +00:00
Norman Maurer
c67a3b0507 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.25.Final 2018-05-14 11:11:24 +00:00
Norman Maurer
b75f44db9a [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2018-04-19 11:56:07 +00:00
Norman Maurer
04fac00c8c [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.24.Final 2018-04-19 11:55:47 +00:00
root
0a61f055f5 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2018-04-04 10:44:46 +00:00
root
8c549bad38 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.23.Final 2018-04-04 10:44:15 +00:00
Scott Mitchell
9d51a40df0 Update NetUtilBenchmark (#7826)
Motivation:
NetUtilBenchmark is using out of date data, throws an exception in the benchmark, and allocates a Set on each run.

Modifications:
- Update the benchmark and reduce each run's overhead

Result:
NetUtilBenchmark is updated.
2018-03-31 08:27:08 +02:00
Francesco Nigro
ed46c4ed00 Copies from read-only heap ByteBuffer to direct ByteBuf can avoid stealth ByteBuf allocation and additional copies
Motivation:

Read-only heap ByteBuffer doesn't expose array: the existent method to perform copies to direct ByteBuf involves the creation of a (maybe pooled) additional heap ByteBuf instance and copy

Modifications:

To avoid stressing the allocator with additional (and stealth) heap ByteBuf allocations is provided a method to perform copies using the (pooled) internal NIO buffer

Result:

Copies from read-only heap ByteBuffer to direct ByteBuf won't create any intermediate ByteBuf
2018-02-27 09:54:21 +09:00
Norman Maurer
69582c0b6c [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2018-02-21 12:52:33 +00:00
Norman Maurer
786f35c6c9 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.22.Final 2018-02-21 12:52:19 +00:00
Norman Maurer
e71fa1e7b6 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2018-02-05 12:02:35 +00:00
Norman Maurer
41ebb5fcca [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.21.Final 2018-02-05 12:02:19 +00:00
Julien Hoarau
3e6b54bb59 Fix failing h2spec tests 8.1.2.1 related to pseudo-headers validation
Motivation:

According to the spec:
All pseudo-header fields MUST appear in the header block before regular
header fields. Any request or response that contains a pseudo-header
field that appears in a header block after
a regular header field MUST be treated as malformed (Section 8.1.2.6).

Pseudo-header fields are only valid in the context in which they are defined.
Pseudo-header fields defined for requests MUST NOT appear in responses;
pseudo-header fields defined for responses MUST NOT appear in requests.
Pseudo-header fields MUST NOT appear in trailers.
Endpoints MUST treat a request or response that contains undefined or
invalid pseudo-header fields as malformed (Section 8.1.2.6).

Clients MUST NOT accept a malformed response. Note that these requirements
are intended to protect against several types of common attacks against HTTP;
they are deliberately strict because being permissive can expose
implementations to these vulnerabilities.

Modifications:

- Introduce validation in HPackDecoder

Result:

- Requests with unknown pseudo-field headers are rejected
- Requests with containing response specific pseudo-headers are rejected
- Requests where pseudo-header appear after regular header are rejected
- h2spec 8.1.2.1 pass
2018-01-29 19:42:56 -08:00
Norman Maurer
4c1e0f596a Use FastThreadLocal for CodecOutputList
Motivation:

We used Recycler for the CodecOutputList which is not optimized for the use-case of access only from the same Thread all the time.

Modifications:

- Use FastThreadLocal for CodecOutputList
- Add benchmark

Result:

Less overhead in our codecs.
2018-01-23 11:34:28 +01:00
Norman Maurer
ea58dc7ac7 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2018-01-21 12:53:51 +00:00
Norman Maurer
96c7132dee [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.20.Final 2018-01-21 12:53:34 +00:00
Francesco Nigro
1cf2687244 Fixed JMH ByteBuf benchmark to avoid dead code elimination
Motivation:

The JMH doc suggests to use BlackHoles to avoid dead code elimination hence would be better to follow this best practice.

Modifications:

Each benchmark method is returning the ByteBuf/ByteBuffer to avoid the JVM to perform any dead code elimination.

Result:

The results are more reliable and comparable to the others provided by other ByteBuf benchmarks (eg HeapByteBufBenchmark)
2017-12-19 14:09:18 +01:00
Scott Mitchell
55ef09f191 Add HttpObjectEncoderBenchmark
Motivation:
Benchmark to measure HttpObjectEncoder performance.

Modifications:
- Create new benchmark HttpObjectEncoderBenchmark

Result:
JMH Microbenchmark for HttpObjectEncoder.
2017-12-16 13:47:34 +01:00
Scott Mitchell
5f0342ebe0 Add RedisEncoderBenchmark
Motivation:
Add a benchmark to measure RedisEncoder's performance

Modifications:
- Add RedisEncoderBenchmark

Result:
JMH benchmark exists to measure RedisEncoder's performance.
2017-12-16 13:42:50 +01:00