Commit Graph

523 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Trustin Lee
085a61a310 Refactor FastThreadLocal to simplify TLV management
Motivation:

When Netty runs in a managed environment such as web application server,
Netty needs to provide an explicit way to remove the thread-local
variables it created to prevent class loader leaks.

FastThreadLocal uses different execution paths for storing a
thread-local variable depending on the type of the current thread.
It increases the complexity of thread-local removal.

Modifications:

- Moved FastThreadLocal and FastThreadLocalThread out of the internal
  package so that a user can use it.
- FastThreadLocal now keeps track of all thread local variables it has
  initialized, and calling FastThreadLocal.removeAll() will remove all
  thread-local variables of the caller thread.
- Added FastThreadLocal.size() for diagnostics and tests
- Introduce InternalThreadLocalMap which is a mixture of hard-wired
  thread local variable fields and extensible indexed variables
- FastThreadLocal now uses InternalThreadLocalMap to implement a
  thread-local variable.
- Added ThreadDeathWatcher.unwatch() so that PooledByteBufAllocator
  tells it to stop watching when its thread-local cache has been freed
  by FastThreadLocal.removeAll().
- Added FastThreadLocalTest to ensure that removeAll() works
- Added microbenchmark for FastThreadLocal and JDK ThreadLocal
- Upgraded to JMH 0.9

Result:

- A user can remove all thread-local variables Netty created, as long as
  he or she did not exit from the current thread. (Note that there's no
  way to remove a thread-local variable from outside of the thread.)
- FastThreadLocal exposes more useful operations such as isSet() because
  we always implement a thread local variable via InternalThreadLocalMap
  instead of falling back to JDK ThreadLocal.
- FastThreadLocalBenchmark shows that this change improves the
  performance of FastThreadLocal even more.
2014-06-19 21:13:55 +09:00
Norman Maurer
ad86ec798d Move calculateNewCapacity(...) to ByteBufAllocator
Motivation:

Currently we have the algorithm of calculate the new capacity of a ByteBuf implemented in AbstractByteBuf. The problem with this is that it is impossible for a user to change it if it not fits well it's use-case. We should better move it to ByteBufAllocator and so let the user implement it's own by either write his/her own ByteBufAllocator or just override the default implementation in one of our provided ByteBufAllocators.

Modifications:

Move calculateNewCapacity(...) to ByteBufAllocator and move the implementation (which was part of AbstractByteBuf) to AbstractByteBufAllocator.

Result:

The user can now override the default calculation algorithm when needed.
2014-06-17 09:35:45 +02:00
Norman Maurer
066f95d047 [#2573] UnpooledUnsafeDirectByteBuf.setBytes(int,ByteBuf,int,int) fails to use fast-path when src has array
Motivation:

UnpooledUnsafeDirectByteBuf.setBytes(int,ByteBuf,int,int) fails to use fast-path when src uses an array as backing storage. This is because the if else uses the wrong ByteBuf for its check.

Modifications:

- Use correct ByteBuf when check for array as backing storage
- Also eliminate unecessary check in UnpooledDirectByteBuf which always fails anyway

Result:

Faster setBytes(...) when src ByteBuf is backed by an array.

No more IndexOutOfBoundsException or data-corruption.
2014-06-16 11:11:41 +02:00
belliottsmith
2a2a21ec59 Introduce FastThreadLocal which uses an EnumMap and a predefined fixed set of possible thread locals
Motivation:
Provide a faster ThreadLocal implementation

Modification:
Add a "FastThreadLocal" which uses an EnumMap and a predefined fixed set of possible thread locals (all of the static instances created by netty) that is around 10-20% faster than standard ThreadLocal in my benchmarks (and can be seen having an effect in the direct PooledByteBufAllocator benchmark that uses the DEFAULT ByteBufAllocator which uses this FastThreadLocal, as opposed to normal instantiations that do not, and in the new RecyclableArrayList benchmark);

Result:
Improved performance
2014-06-13 10:56:18 +02:00
Norman Maurer
61dbc353ca [#2436] Unsafe*ByteBuf implementation should only invert bytes if ByteOrder differ from native ByteOrder
Motivation:
Our Unsafe*ByteBuf implementation always invert bytes when the native ByteOrder is LITTLE_ENDIAN (this is true on intel), even when the user calls order(ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN). This is not optimal for performance reasons as the user should be able to set the ByteOrder to LITTLE_ENDIAN and so write bytes without the extra inverting.

Modification:
- Introduce a new special SwappedByteBuf (called UnsafeDirectSwappedByteBuf) that is used by all the Unsafe*ByteBuf implementation and allows to write without inverting the bytes.
- Add benchmark
- Upgrade jmh to 0.8

Result:
The user is be able to get the max performance even on servers that have ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN as their native ByteOrder.
2014-06-05 10:59:22 +02:00
Trustin Lee
7d9374a582 Use Java 5 foreach for arrays for brevity at no cost 2014-06-02 18:25:25 +09:00
Trustin Lee
af4c30fa56 Remove the deprecated constructor 2014-06-02 18:24:19 +09:00
Trustin Lee
e79ca269b8 Introduce ThreadDeathWatcher
Motivation:

PooledByteBufAllocator's thread local cache and
ReferenceCountUtil.releaseLater() are in need of a way to run an
arbitrary logic when a certain thread is terminated.

Modifications:

- Add ThreadDeathWatcher, which spawns a low-priority daemon thread
  that watches a list of threads periodically (every second) and
  invokes the specified tasks when the associated threads are not alive
  anymore
  - Start-stop logic based on CAS operation proposed by @tea-dragon
- Add debug-level log messages to see if ThreadDeathWatcher works

Result:

- Fixes #2519 because we don't use GlobalEventExecutor anymore
- Cleaner code
2014-06-02 18:23:23 +09:00
Trustin Lee
ea3dac0753 Do not use a pseudo random for tree traversal
Motivation:

If we make allocateRun/SubpageSimple() always try the left node first and make allocateRun/Subpage() always tries the right node first,  it is more likely that allocateRun/Subpage() will find a node with ST_UNUSED sooner.

Modifications:

- Make allocateRunSimple() and allocateSubpageSimple() always try the left node first.
- Make allocateRun() and allocateSubpage() always try the right node first.
- Remove randome

Result:

We get the same performance without using random numbers.
2014-05-30 11:24:16 +09:00
Trustin Lee
e5ed69241b Optimize PooledByteBufAllocator
Motivation:

We still have a room for improvement in PoolChunk.allocateRun() and
Subpage.allocate().

Modifications:

- Unroll the recursion in PoolChunk.allocateRun()
- Subpage.allocate() makes use of the 'nextAvail' value set by previous
  free().

Result:

- PoolChunk.allocateRun() optimization yields 10%+ improvements in
  allocation throughput for non-subpage allocations.
- Subpage.allocate() optimization makes the subpage allocations for
  tiny buffers as fast as non-tiny buffers even when the pageSize is
  huge (e.g. 1048576) because it doesn't need to perform a linear search
  in most cases.
2014-05-30 10:51:21 +09:00
Jake Luciani
d547b5d51d Fix capacity check bug affecting offheap buffers 2014-05-13 07:25:15 +02:00
Trustin Lee
db3709e652 Synchronized between 4.1 and master
Motivation:

4 and 5 were diverged long time ago and we recently reverted some of the
early commits in master.  We must make sure 4.1 and master are not very
different now.

Modification:

Fix found differences

Result:

4.1 and master got closer.
2014-04-25 00:38:02 +09:00
ian
15d11289b0 Fix error that causes (up to) double memory usage
Motivation:

PoolArena's 'normalizeCapacity' function was micro-optimized some
time ago to remove a while loop. However, there was a change of
behavior in the function as a result. Capacities passed into it
that are already powers of 2 (and >= 512) are doubled in size. So
if I ask for a buffer with a capacity of 1024, I will get back one
that actually uses 2048 bytes (stored in maxLength).

Aligning to powers of two for book keeping ease is reasonable,
and if someone tries to expand a buffer, you might as well use some
of the previously wasted space. However, since this distinction
between 'easily expanded' and 'costly to expand' space is not
supported at all by the APIs, I cannot imagine this change to
doubling is desirable or intentional.

This is especially costly when using composite buffers. They
frequently allocate components with a capacity that is a power of
2, and they never attempt to expand components themselves. The end
result is that heavy use of pool-backed composite buffers wastes
almost half of the memory pool (the smaller / initial components are
<512 and so are not affected by the off-by-one bug).

Modifications:

Although I find it difficult to believe that such an optimization
is really helpful, I left it in and fixed the off-by-one issue by
decrementing the value at the start.

I also added a simple test to both attempt to verify that the
decrement fixes the issue without introducing any other change, and
to make it easy for a reviewer to test the existing behavior. PoolArena
does not seem to have much testing or testability support though so
the test is kind of a hack and will break for unrelated changes. I
suggest either removing it or factoring out the single non-static
portion of normalizeCapacity so that the fragile dummy PoolArena is
not required.

Result:

Pooled allocators will allocate less resources to the highly
inefficient and undocumented buffer section between length and
maxLength.

Composite buffers of non-trivial size that are backed by pooled
allocators will use about half as much memory.
2014-04-15 07:03:13 +02:00
Norman Maurer
ceffa82d0d [#2370] Periodically check for not alive Threads and free up their ThreadPoolCache
Motivation:
At the moment we create new ThreadPoolCache whenever a Thread tries either allocate or release something on the PooledByteBufAllocator. When something is released we put it then in its ThreadPoolCache. The problem is we never check if a Thread is not alive anymore and so we may end up with memory that is never freed again if a user create many short living Threads that use the PooledByteBufAllocator.

Modifications:
Periodically check if the Thread is still alive that has a ThreadPoolCache assinged and if not free it.

Result:
Memory is freed up correctly even for short living Threads.
2014-04-09 11:45:11 +02:00
Norman Maurer
8429ecfcc4 Implement Thread caches for pooled buffers to minimize conditions. This fixes [#2264] and [#808].
Motivation:
Remove the synchronization bottleneck in PoolArena and so speed up things

Modifications:

This implementation uses kind of the same technics as outlined in the jemalloc paper and jemalloc
blogpost https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-engineering/scalable-memory-allocation-using-jemalloc/480222803919.

At the moment we only cache for "known" Threads (that powers EventExecutors) and not for others to keep the overhead
minimal when need to free up unused buffers in the cache and free up cached buffers once the Thread completes. Here
we use multi-level caches for tiny, small and normal allocations. Huge allocations are not cached at all to keep the
memory usage at a sane level. All the different cache configurations can be adjusted via system properties or the constructor
directly where it makes sense.

Result:
Less conditions as most allocations can be served by the cache itself
2014-03-20 09:30:57 -07:00
Trustin Lee
19422972e3 Fix and simplify freeing a direct buffer / Fix Android support
Motivation:

6e8ba291cf introduced a regression in Android because Android does not have sun.nio.ch.DirectBuffer (see #2330.)  I also found PlatformDependent0.freeDirectBuffer() and freeDirectBufferUnsafe() are pretty much same after the commit and the unsafe version should be removed.

Modifications:

- Do not use the pooled allocator in Android because it's too resource hungry for Androids.
- Merge PlatformDependent0.freeDirectBuffer() and freeDirectBufferUnsafe() into one method.
- Make the Unsafe unavailable when sun.nio.ch.DirectBuffer is unavailable.  We could keep the Unsafe available and handle the sun.nio.ch.DirectBuffer case separately, but I don't want to complicate our code just because of that.  All supported JDK versions have sun.nio.ch.DirectBuffer if the Unsafe is available.

Result:

Simpler code. Fixes Android support (#2330)
2014-03-20 11:11:07 +09:00
Jakob Buchgraber
1bce46dbb3 Bit tricks to check for and calculate power of two.
Motivation:
I was studying the code and thought this was simpler and easier to
understand.

Modifications:
Replaced the for loop and if conditions, with a simple implementation.

Result:
Code is easier to understand.
2014-03-18 15:59:34 +09:00
Bourne, Geoff
1334d34e9d Fix limit computation of NIO ByteBuffers obtained via ReadOnlyByteBufferBuf.nioBuffer
Motivation:

When starting with a read-only NIO buffer, wrapping it in a ByteBuf,
and then later retrieving a re-wrapped NIO buffer the limit was getting
too short.

Modifications:

Changed ReadOnlyByteBufferBuf.nioBuffer(int,int) to compute the
limit in the same manner as the internalNioBuffer method.

Result:

Round-trip conversion from NIO to ByteBuf to NIO will work reliably.
2014-03-14 08:10:18 +01:00
Trustin Lee
fbd4385506 Determine the default allocator from system property
- Add ByteBufAllocator.DEFAULT
- The default allocator is now 'pooled'
2014-02-14 13:04:12 -08:00
Trustin Lee
dea5c688fd Fix checkstyle 2014-02-13 18:51:32 -08:00
Trustin Lee
ac70dc4546 Update the version to 4.1.0.Alpha1-SNAPSHOT 2014-02-13 18:32:26 -08:00
Trustin Lee
51349352e2 Fix a bug that CompositeByteBuf.touch() does nothing 2014-02-13 18:24:36 -08:00
Trustin Lee
8837afddf8 Enable a user specify an arbitrary information with ReferenceCounted.touch()
- Related: #2163
- Add ResourceLeakHint to allow a user to provide a meaningful information about the leak when touching it
- DefaultChannelHandlerContext now implements ResourceLeakHint to tell where the message is going.
- Cleaner resource leak report by excluding noisy stack trace elements
2014-02-13 18:16:25 -08:00
Trustin Lee
45e70d9935 Add ReferenceCounted.touch() / Add missing retain() overrides
- Fixes #2163
- Inspector warnings
2014-02-13 18:10:11 -08:00
Trustin Lee
2b84314fdd Add Recycler.Handle.recycle() so that it's possible to recycle an object without an explicit reference to Recycler 2014-02-13 17:24:37 -08:00
Trustin Lee
86c4166c24 Fixed various buffer leaks in FixedCompositeByteBufTest 2014-02-13 17:03:13 -08:00
Trustin Lee
26fc84529f Also record retain() and release() 2014-02-13 16:58:45 -08:00
Norman Maurer
2351b8ddd9 Add FixedCompositeByteBuf which can be used to write an array of ByteBuf in an efficient way.
This implementation does not produce as much GC pressure as CompositeByteBuf and so is prefered,
for writing an array of ByteBufs. Be aware that FixedCompositeByteBuf is readonly.

When using this in a project that make heavy use of CompositeByteBuf for writes we was able to cut
down allocation to a half.
2014-02-13 16:52:31 -08:00
Trustin Lee
40003ed250 Resurrect Channel.id() with global uniqueness
- Fixes #1810
- Add a new interface ChannelId and its default implementation which generates globally unique channel ID.
- Replace AbstractChannel.hashCode with ChannelId.hashCode() and ChannelId.shortValue()
- Add variants of ByteBuf.hexDump() which accept byte[] instead of ByteBuf.
2014-02-13 15:53:07 -08:00
Trustin Lee
ef4bc99849 Remove unnecessary parenthesis 2014-02-13 15:52:06 -08:00
Norman Maurer
f23d68b42f [#2187] Always do a volatile read on the refCnt 2014-02-07 09:23:16 +01:00
Norman Maurer
9bee78f91c Provide an optimized AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater, AtomicLongFieldUpdater and AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater 2014-02-06 20:08:45 +01:00
Norman Maurer
d67184b488 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2014-01-21 08:18:32 +01:00
Norman Maurer
287515210d [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.15.Final 2014-01-21 08:18:26 +01:00
Trustin Lee
e83d2e0b4e [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-12-22 21:57:48 +09:00
Trustin Lee
cdb700c7a4 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.14.Final 2013-12-22 21:57:40 +09:00
Trustin Lee
0b7aedb13b [maven-release-plugin] rollback the release of netty-4.0.14.Final 2013-12-22 21:53:24 +09:00
Trustin Lee
4bf6ec7171 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.14.Final 2013-12-22 21:52:56 +09:00
Trustin Lee
9c1a49c58e [maven-release-plugin] rollback the release of netty-4.0.14.Final 2013-12-22 21:47:35 +09:00
Trustin Lee
008a049bf4 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-12-22 21:43:55 +09:00
Trustin Lee
f6cb9088c6 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.14.Final 2013-12-22 21:43:45 +09:00
Norman Maurer
b3d8c81557 Fix all leaks reported during tests
- One notable leak is from WebSocketFrameAggregator
- All other leaks are from tests
2013-12-07 00:44:56 +09:00
Trustin Lee
2102cb062b Fix false-positive leaks
- All derived buffers and swapped buffers of a leak-aware buffer must be wrapped again with the leak-aware buffer
2013-12-06 21:32:56 +09:00
Trustin Lee
e506581eb1 Add ReferenceCountUtil.releaseLater() to make writing tests easy with ReferenceCounteds 2013-12-06 15:13:00 +09:00
Trustin Lee
128c4b96b5 Checkstyle 2013-12-06 13:54:36 +09:00
Trustin Lee
5d39b1fc3d Also record retain() and release() 2013-12-06 13:45:24 +09:00
Trustin Lee
e88172495a Ensure backward compatibility
.. by resurrecting the removed methods and system properties.
2013-12-05 01:02:38 +09:00
Trustin Lee
65b522a2a7 Better buffer leak reporting
- Remove the reference to ResourceLeak from the buffer implementations
  and use wrappers instead:
  - SimpleLeakAwareByteBuf and AdvancedLeakAwareByteBuf
  - It is now allocator's responsibility to create a leak-aware buffer.
  - Added AbstractByteBufAllocator.toLeakAwareBuffer() for easier
    implementation
- Add WrappedByteBuf to reduce duplication between *LeakAwareByteBuf and
  UnreleasableByteBuf
- Raise the level of leak reports to ERROR - because it will break the
  app eventually
- Replace enabled/disabled property with the leak detection level
  - Only print stack trace when level is ADVANCED or above to avoid user
    confusion
- Add the 'leak' build profile, which enables highly detailed leak
  reporting during the build
- Remove ResourceLeakException which is unsed anymore
2013-12-05 00:51:39 +09:00
Norman Maurer
053c512f6d Fix checkstyle 2013-12-02 08:23:57 +01:00
Norman Maurer
14600167d6 [#2021] No need to synchronize for unpooled chunks 2013-12-02 08:02:48 +01:00
Norman Maurer
17f5865e38 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-11-29 19:31:01 +01:00
Norman Maurer
ead617fdcc [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.14.Beta1 2013-11-29 19:30:55 +01:00
Norman Maurer
6cf2748dbb [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-11-28 15:04:51 +01:00
Norman Maurer
5fe7596f49 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.13.Final 2013-11-28 15:04:46 +01:00
Trustin Lee
407f0a36f5 Simplify bundle generation / Add io.netty.versions.properties to all JARs
- Fixes #2003 properly
- Instead of using 'bundle' packaging, use 'jar' packaging.  This is
  more robust because some strict build tools fail to retrieve the
  artifacts from a Maven repository unless their packaging is not 'jar'.
- All artifacts now contain META-INF/io.netty.version.properties, which
  provides the detailed information about the build and repository.
- Removed OSGi testsuite temporarily because it gives false errors
  during split package test and examination.
- Add io.netty.util.Version for easy retrieval of version information
2013-11-26 22:01:46 +09:00
Norman Maurer
7231be592a Also allow to override how direct ByteBuffers are freed 2013-11-12 12:40:41 +01:00
Norman Maurer
e83fb821d5 Allow to override how wrapped direct ByteBuffer are allocated to make it easier to extend 2013-11-12 12:13:38 +01:00
Norman Maurer
b00f8c6390 [#1976] Fix IndexOutOfBoundsException when calling CompositeByteBuf.discardReadComponents() 2013-11-09 20:13:24 +01:00
Alex Petrov
e4f391f626 Improve docstrings for and of 2013-11-08 12:15:41 +01:00
Trustin Lee
ba3bc0c020 Simpler toString() for ByteBufAllocators 2013-11-08 17:54:34 +09:00
Norman Maurer
db78581bbb [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-11-07 18:11:45 +01:00
Norman Maurer
2386777af8 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.12.Final 2013-11-07 18:11:38 +01:00
Norman Maurer
77b4ec7e1b [#1800] [#1802] Correctly expand capacity of ByteBuf while preserve content 2013-11-04 15:18:21 +01:00
Trustin Lee
54db9ec725 Use StringUtil.simpleClassName(..) instead of Class.getSimpleName() where necessary
- Class.getSimpleName() doesn't render anonymous classes very well
- + some minor cleanup
2013-11-04 19:46:15 +09:00
Norman Maurer
4ce49a6195 [#1943] Unpooled.copiedBuffer(ByteBuf pooled) should always return unpooled ByteBuf 2013-10-22 20:20:38 +02:00
Norman Maurer
ceab146b54 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-10-21 07:43:42 +02:00
Norman Maurer
27a89d6032 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.11.Final 2013-10-21 07:41:49 +02:00
Norman Maurer
68b616728a [#1925] Only expose sub-region of ByteBuf on nioBuffer(...) 2013-10-16 10:34:33 +02:00
Norman Maurer
d946659520 [#1906] Use a ByteBuf allocator from the ByteBufAllocator when encode Strings 2013-10-09 21:18:08 +02:00
Norman Maurer
1c73be21fc Remove redundant index check 2013-10-08 07:21:01 +02:00
Bill Gallagher
8f612660b2 disable debugging output during test 2013-10-04 06:45:26 +02:00
Norman Maurer
d7da19f745 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-10-02 15:48:52 +02:00
Norman Maurer
d35768ae11 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.10.Final 2013-10-02 15:48:45 +02:00
Norman Maurer
ee192f0321 [#1880] Use ByteBufAllocator when read bytes into new chunks 2013-10-01 10:10:43 +02:00
Norman Maurer
6d09e57be7 [#1875] Correctly check the readerIndex when try to read a byte from AbstractByteBuf 2013-09-30 14:47:49 +02:00
Norman Maurer
b4fa8af079 Cache underlying ByteBuffers and count in ChannelOutboundBuffer.Entry to reduce object creation and so GC pressure
Beside this it also helps to reduce CPU usage as nioBufferCount() is quite expensive when used on CompositeByteBuf which are
nested and contains a lot of components
2013-09-26 20:37:39 +02:00
Norman Maurer
2b9a07cac9 CompositeByteBuf.isDirect() should return true if its only backed by direct buffers 2013-09-26 20:37:31 +02:00
Norman Maurer
a74149e984 [#1865] Only use internalNioBuffer when one of the read* or write* methods are used. This is neccessary to prevent races as those can happen when a slice or duplicate is shared between different Channels
that are not assigned to the same EventLoop. In general get* operations should always be safe to be used from different Threads.

This aslo include unit tests that show the issue
2013-09-25 17:27:26 +02:00
Norman Maurer
910ed31a1b [#1851] EmptyByteBuf.isWritable(..) and isReadable(...) should not throw IndexOutOfBoundsException 2013-09-21 20:40:22 +02:00
Norman Maurer
23baef8fb4 [#1853] Optimize gathering writes for CompositeByteBuf that are only backed by one ByteBuffer 2013-09-19 07:29:58 +02:00
Norman Maurer
c0bbde48b7 [#1852] Fix bug in UnpooledDirectByteBuf.nioBuffer(...) implementation 2013-09-18 20:47:57 +02:00
Greg Soltis
f1d4f813ed Fix nioBuffer implementation for CompositeByteBuf 2013-09-16 06:41:08 +02:00
Norman Maurer
451e91d142 [#1821] Fix IndexOutOfBoundsException which was thrown if the last component was removed but other components was left 2013-09-09 20:29:30 +02:00
Norman Maurer
ffab456aca Bump up version to reflect correct one 2013-09-09 11:20:12 +02:00
Norman Maurer
363531caf9 [maven-release-plugin] rollback the release of netty-4.0.9.Final 2013-09-06 09:18:34 +02:00
Norman Maurer
9d53573ee8 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-09-06 09:17:15 +02:00
Norman Maurer
25c226a835 Make sure only direct ByteBuffer are passed to the underlying jdk Channel.
This is needed because of otherwise the JDK itself will do an extra ByteBuffer copy with it's own pool implementation. Even worth it will be done
multiple times if the ByteBuffer is always only partial written. With this change the copy is done inside of netty using it's own allocator and
only be done one time in all cases.
2013-09-02 20:17:53 +02:00
Norman Maurer
5416f2315e [#1797] No use internalNioBuffer() in derived buffers as it is not meant for concurrent access 2013-09-02 14:15:19 +02:00
Norman Maurer
0007fb81ef Add tests to try to track down some buffer issues 2013-09-02 13:50:47 +02:00
Norman Maurer
795182843d Remove legancy code which we not need anymore as we use gathering writes anyway everywhere 2013-09-01 11:00:58 +02:00
Norman Maurer
5ddd7cee90 [#1797] Throw IllegalArgumentException if AbstractByteBuf.skipBytes(...) is used with a negative value 2013-08-29 11:14:36 +02:00
Norman Maurer
2e39b25cd4 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-08-26 12:01:03 +02:00
Norman Maurer
b67659a866 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.8.Final 2013-08-26 12:00:54 +02:00
Trustin Lee
20894bc99e Fix a bug in internalNioBuffer() implementations of derived buffers
- A user can create multiple duplicates of a buffer and access their internal NIO buffers. (e.g. write multiple duplicates to multiple channels assigned to different event loop.)  Because the derived buffers' internalNioBuffer() simply delegates the call to the original buffer, all derived buffers and the original buffer's internalNioBuffer() will return the same buffer, which will lead to a race condition.
- Fixes #1739
2013-08-20 14:28:50 +09:00
bgallagher
9f88552f12 remove some dead code 2013-08-10 20:46:48 +02:00
Norman Maurer
1d3560e389 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-08-08 13:53:28 +02:00
Norman Maurer
8e97e6c461 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.7.Final 2013-08-08 13:53:19 +02:00
Norman Maurer
194b64cff1 [#1708] Correctly set the writerIndex in ReadOnlyByteBufferBuf if it is constructed with a buffer which has non zero position 2013-08-08 06:54:32 +02:00
Norman Maurer
ea1dca8105 [#1704] Make sure SwappedByteBuf.readSlice(..) returns ByteBuf with correct ByteOrder 2013-08-06 12:22:22 +02:00
Norman Maurer
3f2000fa3a [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-08-01 10:59:55 +02:00
Norman Maurer
3f70d5caa4 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.6.Final 2013-08-01 10:59:46 +02:00
Norman Maurer
e3410680de [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-07-31 20:08:14 +02:00
Norman Maurer
0e124583d6 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.5.Final 2013-07-31 20:08:05 +02:00
Norman Maurer
8a673db92b [#1644] Fixed IndexOutOfBoundException when calling copy() on a empty CompositeByteBuf 2013-07-24 07:35:51 +02:00
Norman Maurer
0bc7d3f5d1 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-07-23 10:04:23 +02:00
Norman Maurer
ca00182797 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.4.Final 2013-07-23 10:04:14 +02:00
Trustin Lee
764741c5ce Change the contract of ResourceLeakDetector.open() so that unsampled resources are recycled
- This also fixes the problem introduced while trying to implement #1612 (Allow to disable resource leak detection).
2013-07-23 14:06:58 +09:00
Norman Maurer
35802207e1 Fix compile error 2013-07-23 06:42:41 +02:00
kerr
ada07cb9e0 Fix types in javadocs 2013-07-22 19:14:36 +02:00
Norman Maurer
f478fcd3b0 [#1628] Fix bug in ReadOnlyByteByteBufferBuf where get operations threw ReadOnlyBufferException 2013-07-22 07:12:05 +02:00
Norman Maurer
feb8d101bd [#1626] Use static fields for default values 2013-07-22 06:47:29 +02:00
Shawn Silverman
674f4bce51 netty-1597: Rewrite ByteBufInputStream.readLine() to avoid IndexOutOfBoundsException and to behave more correctly for lines ending in '\r'. 2013-07-20 08:05:54 +02:00
Trustin Lee
b130ee6a6c [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-07-18 11:17:42 +09:00
Trustin Lee
10d395e829 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.3.Final 2013-07-18 11:17:31 +09:00
Trustin Lee
f0a3f849f7 Fix a bug in AbstractByteBuf.writeZero() where the capacity is not auto-expanded 2013-07-18 09:55:02 +09:00
Norman Maurer
fc7c950b08 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-07-17 15:58:36 +02:00
Norman Maurer
bbbf72359e [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.2.Final 2013-07-17 15:58:28 +02:00
Trustin Lee
57eb531eb8 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-07-16 17:16:10 +09:00
Trustin Lee
76cefcc421 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.1.Final 2013-07-16 17:15:54 +09:00
Norman Maurer
5297eba280 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-07-15 15:48:15 +02:00
Norman Maurer
c5d8af446a [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.0.Final 2013-07-15 15:48:05 +02:00
Trustin Lee
246a3ecdcb [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-07-15 20:58:33 +09:00
Trustin Lee
e8fd209115 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.0.Final 2013-07-15 20:58:21 +09:00
Norman Maurer
df5daadd0f Remove unused import 2013-07-15 10:09:17 +02:00
Norman Maurer
7254a5c2c6 Just some tiny javadocs optimizations 2013-07-14 16:02:03 +02:00
Trustin Lee
65c2a6ed46 Make ByteBuf an abstract class rather than an interface
- 5% improvement in throughput (HelloWorldServer example)
- Made CompositeByteBuf a concrete class (renamed from DefaultCompositeByteBuf) because there's no multiple inheritance in Java

Fixes #1536
2013-07-08 14:59:52 +09:00
Norman Maurer
086ae3536c [#1533] Introduce ByteBufHolder.duplicate() and make use of it in DefaultChannelGroup.write(...) 2013-07-06 21:17:51 +02:00
Norman Maurer
7dda4b9ce4 [#1532] Remove @deprecated ByteBufIndexFinder and all methods that take it as argument 2013-07-06 20:14:53 +02:00
Trustin Lee
dfc05a6ed7 Fix documentation error in ByteBuf
- Fixes #1531
- Thanks to @daschl
2013-07-05 17:03:34 +09:00
Trustin Lee
0b9235f072 Simplify ByteBufProcessor and MessageListProcessor and Add internal component accessors to CompositeByteBuf
- Fixes #1528

It's not really easy to provide a general-purpose abstraction for fast-yet-safe iteration. Instead of making forEachByte() less optimal, let's make it do what it does really well, and allow a user to implement potentially unsafe-yet-fast loop using unsafe operations.
2013-07-05 14:00:46 +09:00
Norman Maurer
7ec12d327f Remove deprecated ByteBufUtil.release(..) and ByteBufUtil.retain(..) methods and its usage. Also fix a problem where an object would have been released two times.
* The problem with the release(..) calls here was that it would have called release on an unsupported message and then throw an exception. This exception will trigger ChannelOutboundBuffer.fail(..), which will also try to release the message again.
* Also use the same exception type for unsupported messages as in other channel impls.
2013-07-03 10:00:13 +02:00
Norman Maurer
ec5e793a2f [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-07-02 11:41:18 +02:00
Norman Maurer
ca73eaef0d [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.0.CR9 2013-07-02 11:41:09 +02:00
Norman Maurer
830c559405 [maven-release-plugin] rollback the release of netty-4.0.0.CR9 2013-07-02 11:34:29 +02:00
Norman Maurer
66a16b133c [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.0.CR9 2013-07-02 10:45:12 +02:00
Trustin Lee
7e3a01cc51 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-07-02 10:26:48 +09:00
Trustin Lee
149db34c19 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.0.CR8 2013-07-02 10:26:32 +09:00
Trustin Lee
4b11aff08f Less confusing log messages for system properties
- Fixes #1502
2013-07-02 09:23:29 +09:00
Norman Maurer
5d88c423df [#1500] Remove @deprecated methods 2013-07-01 08:53:02 +02:00
Trustin Lee
613547b0b9 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-06-28 22:15:33 +09:00
Trustin Lee
a6abd2feb2 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.0.CR7 2013-06-28 22:15:20 +09:00
Trustin Lee
0dcf352f4c Vastly simplified ByteBufProcessor and MessageListProcessor
- Related: #1378
- They now accept only one argument.
- A user who wants to use a buffer for more complex use cases, he or she can always access the buffer directly via memoryAddress() and array()
2013-06-28 20:29:00 +09:00
Trustin Lee
52691488ee Update Javadoc of ByteBufProcessor and MessageListProcessor
- in response to @shacharo's suggestion
2013-06-27 19:01:01 +09:00
Trustin Lee
ac39cad5ff Split ByteBuf.forEachByte() into forEachByte() and forEachByteDesc()
- Related: #1378
- As suggested by @liqweed
2013-06-27 18:48:09 +09:00
Trustin Lee
9804741fb3 Fix test failure in SlicedByteBuf / Add tests for built-in ByteBufProcessor impls
- Related: #1378
2013-06-27 17:49:46 +09:00
Trustin Lee
98531313de Optimize derived buffers' forEachByte(...) implementation
- Related: #1378
2013-06-27 17:36:22 +09:00
Trustin Lee
b5bb36c087 Use (fromIndex, toIndex) instead of (index, length) for ByteBuf.forEachByte(...)
- Related: #1378
2013-06-27 17:30:19 +09:00
Trustin Lee
792edf631c Deprecate ByteBufIndexFinder
- Prefer ByteBufProcessor
- Related: #1378
2013-06-27 14:26:58 +09:00
Trustin Lee
4dd9b6ef2e Add ByteBufProcessor and ByteBuf.forEach(...)
- Fixes #1378
- Needs to provide optimized forEach implementations though.
2013-06-27 13:55:42 +09:00
Norman Maurer
58b968b603 [#1454] Fix IndexOutOfBoundsException which was thrown if last component of a CompositeByteBuf was removed 2013-06-25 09:32:00 +02:00