andreacavalli/netty5
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
5,359 Commits 27 Branches 234 Tags 84 MiB
b53fa5dd70
Commit Graph

275 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Norman Maurer
4ce49a6195 [#1943] Unpooled.copiedBuffer(ByteBuf pooled) should always return unpooled ByteBuf 2013-10-22 20:20:38 +02:00
Norman Maurer
68b616728a [#1925] Only expose sub-region of ByteBuf on nioBuffer(...) 2013-10-16 10:34:33 +02:00
Norman Maurer
d946659520 [#1906] Use a ByteBuf allocator from the ByteBufAllocator when encode Strings 2013-10-09 21:18:08 +02:00
Norman Maurer
1c73be21fc Remove redundant index check 2013-10-08 07:21:01 +02:00
Bill Gallagher
8f612660b2 disable debugging output during test 2013-10-04 06:45:26 +02:00
Norman Maurer
ee192f0321 [#1880] Use ByteBufAllocator when read bytes into new chunks 2013-10-01 10:10:43 +02:00
Norman Maurer
6d09e57be7 [#1875] Correctly check the readerIndex when try to read a byte from AbstractByteBuf 2013-09-30 14:47:49 +02:00
Norman Maurer
b4fa8af079 Cache underlying ByteBuffers and count in ChannelOutboundBuffer.Entry to reduce object creation and so GC pressure 
Beside this it also helps to reduce CPU usage as nioBufferCount() is quite expensive when used on CompositeByteBuf which are
nested and contains a lot of components
 2013-09-26 20:37:39 +02:00
Norman Maurer
2b9a07cac9 CompositeByteBuf.isDirect() should return true if its only backed by direct buffers 2013-09-26 20:37:31 +02:00
Norman Maurer
a74149e984 [#1865] Only use internalNioBuffer when one of the read* or write* methods are used. This is neccessary to prevent races as those can happen when a slice or duplicate is shared between different Channels 
that are not assigned to the same EventLoop. In general get* operations should always be safe to be used from different Threads.

This aslo include unit tests that show the issue
 2013-09-25 17:27:26 +02:00
Norman Maurer
910ed31a1b [#1851] EmptyByteBuf.isWritable(..) and isReadable(...) should not throw IndexOutOfBoundsException 2013-09-21 20:40:22 +02:00
Norman Maurer
23baef8fb4 [#1853] Optimize gathering writes for CompositeByteBuf that are only backed by one ByteBuffer 2013-09-19 07:29:58 +02:00
Norman Maurer
c0bbde48b7 [#1852] Fix bug in UnpooledDirectByteBuf.nioBuffer(...) implementation 2013-09-18 20:47:57 +02:00
Greg Soltis
f1d4f813ed Fix nioBuffer implementation for CompositeByteBuf 2013-09-16 06:41:08 +02:00
Norman Maurer
451e91d142 [#1821] Fix IndexOutOfBoundsException which was thrown if the last component was removed but other components was left 2013-09-09 20:29:30 +02:00
Norman Maurer
25c226a835 Make sure only direct ByteBuffer are passed to the underlying jdk Channel. 
This is needed because of otherwise the JDK itself will do an extra ByteBuffer copy with it's own pool implementation. Even worth it will be done
multiple times if the ByteBuffer is always only partial written. With this change the copy is done inside of netty using it's own allocator and
only be done one time in all cases.
 2013-09-02 20:17:53 +02:00
Norman Maurer
5416f2315e [#1797] No use internalNioBuffer() in derived buffers as it is not meant for concurrent access 2013-09-02 14:15:19 +02:00
Norman Maurer
0007fb81ef Add tests to try to track down some buffer issues 2013-09-02 13:50:47 +02:00
Norman Maurer
795182843d Remove legancy code which we not need anymore as we use gathering writes anyway everywhere 2013-09-01 11:00:58 +02:00
Norman Maurer
5ddd7cee90 [#1797] Throw IllegalArgumentException if AbstractByteBuf.skipBytes(...) is used with a negative value 2013-08-29 11:14:36 +02:00
Trustin Lee
20894bc99e Fix a bug in internalNioBuffer() implementations of derived buffers 
- A user can create multiple duplicates of a buffer and access their internal NIO buffers. (e.g. write multiple duplicates to multiple channels assigned to different event loop.)  Because the derived buffers' internalNioBuffer() simply delegates the call to the original buffer, all derived buffers and the original buffer's internalNioBuffer() will return the same buffer, which will lead to a race condition.
- Fixes #1739
 2013-08-20 14:28:50 +09:00
bgallagher
9f88552f12 remove some dead code 2013-08-10 20:46:48 +02:00
Norman Maurer
194b64cff1 [#1708] Correctly set the writerIndex in ReadOnlyByteBufferBuf if it is constructed with a buffer which has non zero position 2013-08-08 06:54:32 +02:00
Norman Maurer
ea1dca8105 [#1704] Make sure SwappedByteBuf.readSlice(..) returns ByteBuf with correct ByteOrder 2013-08-06 12:22:22 +02:00
Norman Maurer
8a673db92b [#1644] Fixed IndexOutOfBoundException when calling copy() on a empty CompositeByteBuf 2013-07-24 07:35:51 +02:00
Trustin Lee
764741c5ce Change the contract of ResourceLeakDetector.open() so that unsampled resources are recycled 
- This also fixes the problem introduced while trying to implement #1612 (Allow to disable resource leak detection).
 2013-07-23 14:06:58 +09:00
Norman Maurer
35802207e1 Fix compile error 2013-07-23 06:42:41 +02:00
kerr
ada07cb9e0 Fix types in javadocs 2013-07-22 19:14:36 +02:00
Norman Maurer
f478fcd3b0 [#1628] Fix bug in ReadOnlyByteByteBufferBuf where get operations threw ReadOnlyBufferException 2013-07-22 07:12:05 +02:00
Norman Maurer
feb8d101bd [#1626] Use static fields for default values 2013-07-22 06:47:29 +02:00
Shawn Silverman
674f4bce51 netty-1597: Rewrite ByteBufInputStream.readLine() to avoid IndexOutOfBoundsException and to behave more correctly for lines ending in '\r'. 2013-07-20 08:05:54 +02:00
Trustin Lee
f0a3f849f7 Fix a bug in AbstractByteBuf.writeZero() where the capacity is not auto-expanded 2013-07-18 09:55:02 +09:00
Norman Maurer
df5daadd0f Remove unused import 2013-07-15 10:09:17 +02:00
Norman Maurer
7254a5c2c6 Just some tiny javadocs optimizations 2013-07-14 16:02:03 +02:00
Trustin Lee
65c2a6ed46 Make ByteBuf an abstract class rather than an interface 
- 5% improvement in throughput (HelloWorldServer example)
- Made CompositeByteBuf a concrete class (renamed from DefaultCompositeByteBuf) because there's no multiple inheritance in Java

Fixes #1536
 2013-07-08 14:59:52 +09:00
Norman Maurer
086ae3536c [#1533] Introduce ByteBufHolder.duplicate() and make use of it in DefaultChannelGroup.write(...) 2013-07-06 21:17:51 +02:00
Norman Maurer
7dda4b9ce4 [#1532] Remove @deprecated ByteBufIndexFinder and all methods that take it as argument 2013-07-06 20:14:53 +02:00
Trustin Lee
dfc05a6ed7 Fix documentation error in ByteBuf 
- Fixes #1531
- Thanks to @daschl
 2013-07-05 17:03:34 +09:00
Trustin Lee
0b9235f072 Simplify ByteBufProcessor and MessageListProcessor and Add internal component accessors to CompositeByteBuf 
- Fixes #1528

It's not really easy to provide a general-purpose abstraction for fast-yet-safe iteration. Instead of making forEachByte() less optimal, let's make it do what it does really well, and allow a user to implement potentially unsafe-yet-fast loop using unsafe operations.
 2013-07-05 14:00:46 +09:00
Norman Maurer
7ec12d327f Remove deprecated ByteBufUtil.release(..) and ByteBufUtil.retain(..) methods and its usage. Also fix a problem where an object would have been released two times. 
* The problem with the release(..) calls here was that it would have called release on an unsupported message and then throw an exception. This exception will trigger ChannelOutboundBuffer.fail(..), which will also try to release the message again.
* Also use the same exception type for unsupported messages as in other channel impls.
 2013-07-03 10:00:13 +02:00
Trustin Lee
4b11aff08f Less confusing log messages for system properties 
- Fixes #1502
 2013-07-02 09:23:29 +09:00
Norman Maurer
5d88c423df [#1500] Remove @deprecated methods 2013-07-01 08:53:02 +02:00
Trustin Lee
0dcf352f4c Vastly simplified ByteBufProcessor and MessageListProcessor 
- Related: #1378
- They now accept only one argument.
- A user who wants to use a buffer for more complex use cases, he or she can always access the buffer directly via memoryAddress() and array()
 2013-06-28 20:29:00 +09:00
Trustin Lee
52691488ee Update Javadoc of ByteBufProcessor and MessageListProcessor 
- in response to @shacharo's suggestion
 2013-06-27 19:01:01 +09:00
Trustin Lee
ac39cad5ff Split ByteBuf.forEachByte() into forEachByte() and forEachByteDesc() 
- Related: #1378
- As suggested by @liqweed
 2013-06-27 18:48:09 +09:00
Trustin Lee
9804741fb3 Fix test failure in SlicedByteBuf / Add tests for built-in ByteBufProcessor impls 
- Related: #1378
 2013-06-27 17:49:46 +09:00
Trustin Lee
98531313de Optimize derived buffers' forEachByte(...) implementation 
- Related: #1378
 2013-06-27 17:36:22 +09:00
Trustin Lee
b5bb36c087 Use (fromIndex, toIndex) instead of (index, length) for ByteBuf.forEachByte(...) 
- Related: #1378
 2013-06-27 17:30:19 +09:00
Trustin Lee
792edf631c Deprecate ByteBufIndexFinder 
- Prefer ByteBufProcessor
- Related: #1378
 2013-06-27 14:26:58 +09:00
Trustin Lee
4dd9b6ef2e Add ByteBufProcessor and ByteBuf.forEach(...) 
- Fixes #1378
- Needs to provide optimized forEach implementations though.
 2013-06-27 13:55:42 +09:00