Commit Graph

109 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Norman Maurer
f88dfd0430 [#2653] Remove unnecessary ensureAccessible() calls
Motivation:

I introduced ensureAccessible() class as part of 6c47cc9711 in some places. Unfortunally I also added some where these are not needed and so caused a performance regression.

Modification:

Remove calls where not needed.

Result:

Fixed performance regression.
2014-07-14 21:04:12 +02:00
Trustin Lee
fbf1bdbef1 Fix the build timeout when 'leak' profile is active
Motivation:

AbstractByteBufTest.testInternalBuffer() uses writeByte() operations to
populate the sample data.  Usually, this isn't a problem, but it starts
to take a lot of time when the resource leak detection level gets
higher.

In our CI machine, testInternalBuffer() takes more than 30 minutes,
causing the build timeout when the 'leak' profile is active (paranoid
level resource detection.)

Modification:

Populate the sample data using ThreadLocalRandom.nextBytes() instead of
using millions of writeByte() operations.

Result:

Test runs much faster when leak detection level is high.
2014-07-03 17:55:10 +09:00
Trustin Lee
d0912f2709 Fix most inspector warnings
Motivation:

It's good to minimize potentially broken windows.

Modifications:

Fix most inspector warnings from our profile
Update IntObjectHashMap

Result:

Cleaner code
2014-07-02 19:55:07 +09:00
Norman Maurer
9594a81b95 [#2622] Correctly check reference count before try to work on the underlying memory
Motivation:

Because of how we use reference counting we need to check for the reference count before each operation that touches the underlying memory. This is especially true as we use sun.misc.Cleaner.clean() to release the memory ASAP when possible. Because of this the user may cause a SEGFAULT if an operation is called that tries to access the backing memory after it was released.

Modification:

Correctly check the reference count on all methods that access the underlying memory or expose it via a ByteBuffer.

Result:

Safer usage of ByteBuf
2014-06-30 07:14:25 +02:00
Trustin Lee
41d44a8161 Remove 'get' prefix from all HTTP/SPDY messages
Motivation:

Persuit for the consistency in method naming

Modifications:

- Remove the 'get' prefix from all HTTP/SPDY message classes
- Fix some inspector warnings

Result:

Consistency
2014-06-24 18:03:33 +09:00
Norman Maurer
f05510063e Remove System.out.println(...) debug messages 2014-06-20 19:42:38 +02:00
Norman Maurer
371f8066d2 [#2580] [#2587] Fix buffer corruption regression when ByteBuf.order(LITTLE_ENDIAN) is used
Motivation:

To improve the speed of ByteBuf with order LITTLE_ENDIAN and where the native order is also LITTLE_ENDIAN (intel) we introduces a new special SwappedByteBuf before in commit 4ad3984c8b. Unfortunally the commit has a flaw which does not handle correctly the case when a ByteBuf expands. This was caused because the memoryAddress was cached and never changed again even if the underlying buffer expanded. This can lead to corrupt data or even to SEGFAULT the JVM if you are lucky enough.

Modification:

Always lookup the actual memoryAddress of the wrapped ByteBuf.

Result:

No more data-corruption for ByteBuf with order LITTLE_ENDIAN and no JVM crashes.
2014-06-20 18:24:44 +02:00
Jake Luciani
d547b5d51d Fix capacity check bug affecting offheap buffers 2014-05-13 07:25:15 +02:00
ian
15d11289b0 Fix error that causes (up to) double memory usage
Motivation:

PoolArena's 'normalizeCapacity' function was micro-optimized some
time ago to remove a while loop. However, there was a change of
behavior in the function as a result. Capacities passed into it
that are already powers of 2 (and >= 512) are doubled in size. So
if I ask for a buffer with a capacity of 1024, I will get back one
that actually uses 2048 bytes (stored in maxLength).

Aligning to powers of two for book keeping ease is reasonable,
and if someone tries to expand a buffer, you might as well use some
of the previously wasted space. However, since this distinction
between 'easily expanded' and 'costly to expand' space is not
supported at all by the APIs, I cannot imagine this change to
doubling is desirable or intentional.

This is especially costly when using composite buffers. They
frequently allocate components with a capacity that is a power of
2, and they never attempt to expand components themselves. The end
result is that heavy use of pool-backed composite buffers wastes
almost half of the memory pool (the smaller / initial components are
<512 and so are not affected by the off-by-one bug).

Modifications:

Although I find it difficult to believe that such an optimization
is really helpful, I left it in and fixed the off-by-one issue by
decrementing the value at the start.

I also added a simple test to both attempt to verify that the
decrement fixes the issue without introducing any other change, and
to make it easy for a reviewer to test the existing behavior. PoolArena
does not seem to have much testing or testability support though so
the test is kind of a hack and will break for unrelated changes. I
suggest either removing it or factoring out the single non-static
portion of normalizeCapacity so that the fragile dummy PoolArena is
not required.

Result:

Pooled allocators will allocate less resources to the highly
inefficient and undocumented buffer section between length and
maxLength.

Composite buffers of non-trivial size that are backed by pooled
allocators will use about half as much memory.
2014-04-15 07:03:13 +02:00
Bourne, Geoff
1334d34e9d Fix limit computation of NIO ByteBuffers obtained via ReadOnlyByteBufferBuf.nioBuffer
Motivation:

When starting with a read-only NIO buffer, wrapping it in a ByteBuf,
and then later retrieving a re-wrapped NIO buffer the limit was getting
too short.

Modifications:

Changed ReadOnlyByteBufferBuf.nioBuffer(int,int) to compute the
limit in the same manner as the internalNioBuffer method.

Result:

Round-trip conversion from NIO to ByteBuf to NIO will work reliably.
2014-03-14 08:10:18 +01:00
Trustin Lee
86c4166c24 Fixed various buffer leaks in FixedCompositeByteBufTest 2014-02-13 17:03:13 -08:00
Norman Maurer
2351b8ddd9 Add FixedCompositeByteBuf which can be used to write an array of ByteBuf in an efficient way.
This implementation does not produce as much GC pressure as CompositeByteBuf and so is prefered,
for writing an array of ByteBufs. Be aware that FixedCompositeByteBuf is readonly.

When using this in a project that make heavy use of CompositeByteBuf for writes we was able to cut
down allocation to a half.
2014-02-13 16:52:31 -08:00
Norman Maurer
b3d8c81557 Fix all leaks reported during tests
- One notable leak is from WebSocketFrameAggregator
- All other leaks are from tests
2013-12-07 00:44:56 +09:00
Trustin Lee
e506581eb1 Add ReferenceCountUtil.releaseLater() to make writing tests easy with ReferenceCounteds 2013-12-06 15:13:00 +09:00
Norman Maurer
b00f8c6390 [#1976] Fix IndexOutOfBoundsException when calling CompositeByteBuf.discardReadComponents() 2013-11-09 20:13:24 +01:00
Norman Maurer
77b4ec7e1b [#1800] [#1802] Correctly expand capacity of ByteBuf while preserve content 2013-11-04 15:18:21 +01:00
Norman Maurer
68b616728a [#1925] Only expose sub-region of ByteBuf on nioBuffer(...) 2013-10-16 10:34:33 +02:00
Bill Gallagher
8f612660b2 disable debugging output during test 2013-10-04 06:45:26 +02:00
Norman Maurer
6d09e57be7 [#1875] Correctly check the readerIndex when try to read a byte from AbstractByteBuf 2013-09-30 14:47:49 +02:00
Norman Maurer
b4fa8af079 Cache underlying ByteBuffers and count in ChannelOutboundBuffer.Entry to reduce object creation and so GC pressure
Beside this it also helps to reduce CPU usage as nioBufferCount() is quite expensive when used on CompositeByteBuf which are
nested and contains a lot of components
2013-09-26 20:37:39 +02:00
Norman Maurer
2b9a07cac9 CompositeByteBuf.isDirect() should return true if its only backed by direct buffers 2013-09-26 20:37:31 +02:00
Norman Maurer
a74149e984 [#1865] Only use internalNioBuffer when one of the read* or write* methods are used. This is neccessary to prevent races as those can happen when a slice or duplicate is shared between different Channels
that are not assigned to the same EventLoop. In general get* operations should always be safe to be used from different Threads.

This aslo include unit tests that show the issue
2013-09-25 17:27:26 +02:00
Norman Maurer
910ed31a1b [#1851] EmptyByteBuf.isWritable(..) and isReadable(...) should not throw IndexOutOfBoundsException 2013-09-21 20:40:22 +02:00
Norman Maurer
23baef8fb4 [#1853] Optimize gathering writes for CompositeByteBuf that are only backed by one ByteBuffer 2013-09-19 07:29:58 +02:00
Norman Maurer
c0bbde48b7 [#1852] Fix bug in UnpooledDirectByteBuf.nioBuffer(...) implementation 2013-09-18 20:47:57 +02:00
Greg Soltis
f1d4f813ed Fix nioBuffer implementation for CompositeByteBuf 2013-09-16 06:41:08 +02:00
Norman Maurer
451e91d142 [#1821] Fix IndexOutOfBoundsException which was thrown if the last component was removed but other components was left 2013-09-09 20:29:30 +02:00
Norman Maurer
5416f2315e [#1797] No use internalNioBuffer() in derived buffers as it is not meant for concurrent access 2013-09-02 14:15:19 +02:00
Norman Maurer
0007fb81ef Add tests to try to track down some buffer issues 2013-09-02 13:50:47 +02:00
Norman Maurer
5ddd7cee90 [#1797] Throw IllegalArgumentException if AbstractByteBuf.skipBytes(...) is used with a negative value 2013-08-29 11:14:36 +02:00
Norman Maurer
194b64cff1 [#1708] Correctly set the writerIndex in ReadOnlyByteBufferBuf if it is constructed with a buffer which has non zero position 2013-08-08 06:54:32 +02:00
Norman Maurer
ea1dca8105 [#1704] Make sure SwappedByteBuf.readSlice(..) returns ByteBuf with correct ByteOrder 2013-08-06 12:22:22 +02:00
Norman Maurer
8a673db92b [#1644] Fixed IndexOutOfBoundException when calling copy() on a empty CompositeByteBuf 2013-07-24 07:35:51 +02:00
Shawn Silverman
674f4bce51 netty-1597: Rewrite ByteBufInputStream.readLine() to avoid IndexOutOfBoundsException and to behave more correctly for lines ending in '\r'. 2013-07-20 08:05:54 +02:00
Norman Maurer
df5daadd0f Remove unused import 2013-07-15 10:09:17 +02:00
Norman Maurer
7dda4b9ce4 [#1532] Remove @deprecated ByteBufIndexFinder and all methods that take it as argument 2013-07-06 20:14:53 +02:00
Trustin Lee
0b9235f072 Simplify ByteBufProcessor and MessageListProcessor and Add internal component accessors to CompositeByteBuf
- Fixes #1528

It's not really easy to provide a general-purpose abstraction for fast-yet-safe iteration. Instead of making forEachByte() less optimal, let's make it do what it does really well, and allow a user to implement potentially unsafe-yet-fast loop using unsafe operations.
2013-07-05 14:00:46 +09:00
Trustin Lee
0dcf352f4c Vastly simplified ByteBufProcessor and MessageListProcessor
- Related: #1378
- They now accept only one argument.
- A user who wants to use a buffer for more complex use cases, he or she can always access the buffer directly via memoryAddress() and array()
2013-06-28 20:29:00 +09:00
Trustin Lee
ac39cad5ff Split ByteBuf.forEachByte() into forEachByte() and forEachByteDesc()
- Related: #1378
- As suggested by @liqweed
2013-06-27 18:48:09 +09:00
Trustin Lee
9804741fb3 Fix test failure in SlicedByteBuf / Add tests for built-in ByteBufProcessor impls
- Related: #1378
2013-06-27 17:49:46 +09:00
Trustin Lee
b5bb36c087 Use (fromIndex, toIndex) instead of (index, length) for ByteBuf.forEachByte(...)
- Related: #1378
2013-06-27 17:30:19 +09:00
Trustin Lee
4dd9b6ef2e Add ByteBufProcessor and ByteBuf.forEach(...)
- Fixes #1378
- Needs to provide optimized forEach implementations though.
2013-06-27 13:55:42 +09:00
Norman Maurer
58b968b603 [#1454] Fix IndexOutOfBoundsException which was thrown if last component of a CompositeByteBuf was removed 2013-06-25 09:32:00 +02:00
Trustin Lee
7eb0f6105d Fix memory leaks 2013-06-13 13:32:47 +09:00
Derek Troy-West
f2d8a745b1 [#1422] ReadOnlyByteBuffer.isWritable() should return false 2013-06-10 09:23:57 +02:00
Trustin Lee
14158070bf Revamp the core API to reduce memory footprint and consumption
The API changes made so far turned out to increase the memory footprint
and consumption while our intention was actually decreasing them.

Memory consumption issue:

When there are many connections which does not exchange data frequently,
the old Netty 4 API spent a lot more memory than 3 because it always
allocates per-handler buffer for each connection unless otherwise
explicitly stated by a user.  In a usual real world load, a client
doesn't always send requests without pausing, so the idea of having a
buffer whose life cycle if bound to the life cycle of a connection
didn't work as expected.

Memory footprint issue:

The old Netty 4 API decreased overall memory footprint by a great deal
in many cases.  It was mainly because the old Netty 4 API did not
allocate a new buffer and event object for each read.  Instead, it
created a new buffer for each handler in a pipeline.  This works pretty
well as long as the number of handlers in a pipeline is only a few.
However, for a highly modular application with many handlers which
handles connections which lasts for relatively short period, it actually
makes the memory footprint issue much worse.

Changes:

All in all, this is about retaining all the good changes we made in 4 so
far such as better thread model and going back to the way how we dealt
with message events in 3.

To fix the memory consumption/footprint issue mentioned above, we made a
hard decision to break the backward compatibility again with the
following changes:

- Remove MessageBuf
- Merge Buf into ByteBuf
- Merge ChannelInboundByte/MessageHandler and ChannelStateHandler into ChannelInboundHandler
  - Similar changes were made to the adapter classes
- Merge ChannelOutboundByte/MessageHandler and ChannelOperationHandler into ChannelOutboundHandler
  - Similar changes were made to the adapter classes
- Introduce MessageList which is similar to `MessageEvent` in Netty 3
- Replace inboundBufferUpdated(ctx) with messageReceived(ctx, MessageList)
- Replace flush(ctx, promise) with write(ctx, MessageList, promise)
- Remove ByteToByteEncoder/Decoder/Codec
  - Replaced by MessageToByteEncoder<ByteBuf>, ByteToMessageDecoder<ByteBuf>, and ByteMessageCodec<ByteBuf>
- Merge EmbeddedByteChannel and EmbeddedMessageChannel into EmbeddedChannel
- Add SimpleChannelInboundHandler which is sometimes more useful than
  ChannelInboundHandlerAdapter
- Bring back Channel.isWritable() from Netty 3
- Add ChannelInboundHandler.channelWritabilityChanges() event
- Add RecvByteBufAllocator configuration property
  - Similar to ReceiveBufferSizePredictor in Netty 3
  - Some existing configuration properties such as
    DatagramChannelConfig.receivePacketSize is gone now.
- Remove suspend/resumeIntermediaryDeallocation() in ByteBuf

This change would have been impossible without @normanmaurer's help. He
fixed, ported, and improved many parts of the changes.
2013-06-10 16:10:39 +09:00
Trustin Lee
b5989e2449 Reduce exception instantiation overhead in SslHandler / Reduce unnecessary empty array creation
- Added EmptyArrays as an internal utility class
2013-04-24 09:32:53 +09:00
Trustin Lee
32fa4c07f3 Do not unwrap a CompositeByteBuf when it is added as a component of another CompositeByteBuf
.. because Reference counting introduces life cycle issues to the CompositeByteBuf being added.

 - Fixes #1266
2013-04-23 21:53:51 +09:00
Trustin Lee
87007d4eb8 Fix another memory leak in AbstractByteBufTest 2013-04-23 13:46:34 +09:00
Norman Maurer
ab685de7a3 [#1273] Fix resource leaks in test 2013-04-22 09:47:44 +02:00