Summary: By removing some includes form options.h and reply on forward declaration, we can more easily reason the dependencies.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: kailiu, haobo, igor, dhruba
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15411
Summary:
A lot of our code implicitly assumes number_levels to be static. ReduceNumberOfLevels() breaks that assumption. For example, after calling ReduceNumberOfLevels(), DBImpl::NumberLevels() will be different from VersionSet::NumberLevels(). This is dangerous. Thankfully, it's not in public headers and is only used from LDB cmd tool. LDB tool is only using it statically, i.e. it never calls it with running DB instance. With this diff, we make it explicitly static. This way, we can assume number_levels to be immutable and not break assumption that lot of our code is relying upon. LDB tool can still use the method.
Also, I removed the method from a separate file since it breaks filename completition. version_se<TAB> now completes to "version_set." instead of "version_set" (without the dot). I don't see a big reason that the function should be in a different file.
Test Plan: reduce_levels_test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15303
Summary:
MemTableListVersion is to MemTableList what Version is to VersionSet. I took almost the same ideas to develop MemTableListVersion. The reason is to have copying std::list done in background, while flushing, rather than in foreground (MultiGet() and NewIterator()) under a mutex! Also, whenever we copied MemTableList, we copied also some MemTableList metadata (flush_requested_, commit_in_progress_, etc.), which was wasteful.
This diff avoids std::list copy under a mutex in both MultiGet() and NewIterator(). I created a small database with some number of immutable memtables, and creating 100.000 iterators in a single-thread (!) decreased from {188739, 215703, 198028} to {154352, 164035, 159817}. A lot of the savings come from code under a mutex, so we should see much higher savings with multiple threads. Creating new iterator is very important to LogDevice team.
I also think this diff will make SuperVersion obsolete for performance reasons. I will try it in the next diff. SuperVersion gave us huge savings on Get() code path, but I think that most of the savings came from copying MemTableList under a mutex. If we had MemTableListVersion, we would never need to copy the entire object (like we still do in NewIterator() and MultiGet())
Test Plan: `make check` works. I will also do `make valgrind_check` before commit
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong, emayanke, tnovak
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15255
Summary:
Mixing index/filter blocks with data blocks resulted in some known
issues. To make sure in next release our users won't be affected,
we added a new option in BlockBasedTableFactory::TableOption to
conceal this functionality for now.
This patch also introduced a BlockBasedTableReader::OpenOptions,
which avoids the "infinite" growth of parameters in
BlockBasedTableReader::Open().
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, igor, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, tnovak
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15327
Summary:
It looks like we might have some trouble when building the new release with 4.8, since fbcode is using glibc2.17-fb by default and we are using glibc2.17. It was reported by Benjamin Renard in our internal group.
This diff moves our fbcode build to use glibc2.17-fb by default. I got some linker errors when compiling, complaining that `google::SetUsageMessage()` was undefined. After deleting all offending lines, the compile was successful and everything works.
Test Plan:
Compiled
Ran ./db_bench ./db_stress ./db_repl_stress
Reviewers: kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15405
Summary: Currently, compaction multipliers can overflow and cause unexpected behaviors. In this patch, we detect those overflows and use multiplier 1 for them.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, igor, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15321
Summary: as title
Test Plan:
make all check
What else tests shall I cover?
Reviewers: igor, haobo
CC:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15339
Summary:
This diff implements a special type of iterator that doesn't create a snapshot
(can be used to read newly inserted data) and is optimized for doing sequential
reads.
TailingIterator uses current superversion number to determine whether to
invalidate its internal iterators. If the version hasn't changed, it can often
avoid doing expensive seeks over immutable structures (sst files and immutable
memtables).
Test Plan:
* new unit tests
* running LD with this patch
Reviewers: igor, dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb, lovro, march
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15285
Summary:
In this diff I made some effort to reduce usage of friending. To do that, I had to expose Compaction::inputs_ through a method inputs(). Not sure if this is a good idea, there is a trade-off. I think it's less confusing than having lots of friends.
I also thought about other friendship relationships, but they are too much tangled at this point. Once you friend two classes, it's very hard to unfriend them :)
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, sdong, dhruba
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15267
Summary:
This diff does two things:
* Rethinks how we call Recover() with read_only option. Before, we call it with pointer to memtable where we'd like to apply those changes to. This memtable is set in db_impl_readonly.cc and it's actually DBImpl::mem_. Why don't we just apply updates to mem_ right away? It seems more intuitive.
* Changes when we apply updates to manifest. Before, the process is to recover all the logs, flush it to sst files and then do one giant commit that atomically adds all recovered sst files and sets the next log number. This works good enough, but causes some small troubles for my column family approach, since I can't have one VersionEdit apply to more than single column family[1]. The change here is to commit the files recovered from logs right away. Here is the state of the world before the change:
1. Recover log 5, add new sst files to edit
2. Recover log 7, add new sst files to edit
3. Recover log 8, add new sst files to edit
4. Commit all added sst files to manifest and mark log files 5, 7 and 8 as recoverd (via SetLogNumber(9) function)
After the change, we'll do:
1. Recover log 5, commit the new sst files and set log 5 as recovered
2. Recover log 7, commit the new sst files and set log 7 as recovered
3. Recover log 8, commit the new sst files and set log 8 as recovered
The added (small) benefit is that if we fail after (2), the new recovery will only have to recover log 8. In previous case, we'll have to restart the recovery from the beginning. The bigger benefit will be to enable easier integration of multiple column families in Recovery code path.
[1] I'm happy to dicuss this decison, but I believe this is the cleanest way to go. It also makes backward compatibility much easier. We don't have a requirement of adding multiple column families atomically.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15237
Summary:
This moves the use of versions_ to before the mutex is unlocked
to avoid a possible race.
Task ID: #
Blame Rev:
Test Plan:
make check
Revert Plan:
Database Impact:
Memcache Impact:
Other Notes:
EImportant:
- begin *PUBLIC* platform impact section -
Bugzilla: #
- end platform impact -
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15279
Summary: I'm separating code-cleanup part of https://reviews.facebook.net/D14517. This will make D14517 easier to understand and this diff easier to review.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, sdong, dhruba, tnovak
Reviewed By: tnovak
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15099
Summary:
The SIGSEGV was introduced by https://reviews.facebook.net/D15171
I also fixed ExpandWhileOverlapping() which returned the failure by setting it's own stack variable to nullptr (!). This bug is present in 2.6 release, so I guess ExpandWhileOverlapping never fails :)
Test Plan: `make check`. Also MarkCallaghan confirmed it fixed the SIGSEGV he reported.
Reviewers: MarkCallaghan, kailiu, sdong, dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15261
Summary:
This had a few bugs.
1) bottom and top were reversed. top is for the max value but the callers were passing the max
value to bottom. The result is that the max sleep is used when n >= bottom.
2) one of the callers passed values with type double and these values are frequently between
1.0 and 2.0 so rounding will do some bad things
3) sometimes the function returned 0 when there should be a stall
With this change and one other diff (out for review soon) there are slightly fewer stalls on one workload.
With the fix.
Stalls(secs): 160.166 level0_slowdown, 0.000 level0_numfiles, 0.000 memtable_compaction, 58.495 leveln_slowdown
Stalls(count): 910261 level0_slowdown, 0 level0_numfiles, 0 memtable_compaction, 54526 leveln_slowdown
Without the fix.
Stalls(secs): 172.227 level0_slowdown, 0.000 level0_numfiles, 0.000 memtable_compaction, 56.538 leveln_slowdown
Stalls(count): 160831 level0_slowdown, 0 level0_numfiles, 0 memtable_compaction, 52845 leveln_slowdown
Task ID: #
Blame Rev:
Test Plan:
run db_bench for --benchmarks=overwrite with IO-bound database
Revert Plan:
Database Impact:
Memcache Impact:
Other Notes:
EImportant:
- begin *PUBLIC* platform impact section -
Bugzilla: #
- end platform impact -
Reviewers: haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15243
Summary: The only thing we do with compaction pointers is set them to some values, we never actually read them. I don't know what we used them for, but it doesn't look like we use them anymore.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15225
Summary:
This is a big one. This diff moves all the code related to picking compactions from VersionSet to new class CompactionPicker. Column families' compactions will be completely separate processes, so we need to have multiple CompactionPickers.
To make this easier to review, most of the code change is just copy/paste. There is also a small change not to use VersionSet::current_, but rather to take `Version* version` as a parameter. Most of the other code is exactly the same.
In future diffs, I will also make some improvements to CompactionPickers. I think the most important part will be encapsulating it better. Currently Version, VersionSet, Compaction and CompactionPicker are all friend classes, which makes it harder to change the implementation.
This diff depends on D15171, D15183, D15189 and D15201
Test Plan: `make check`
Reviewers: kailiu, sdong, dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15207
Summary:
shared_ptr is slower than unique_ptr (which literally comes with no performance cost compare with raw pointers).
In memtable and memtable rep, we use shared_ptr when we'd actually should use unique_ptr.
According to igor's previous work, we are likely to make quite some performance gain from this diff.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, igor, sdong, haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15213
Summary:
I'm sure we'll all agree that version_set.cc needs simplifying. This diff moves Compaction class to a separate file.
The diff depends on D15171 and D15183
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15189
Summary:
There were some functions in VersionSet that had no reason to be there instead of Version. Moving them to Version will make column families implementation easier.
The functions moved are:
* NumLevelBytes
* LevelSummary
* LevelFileSummary
* MaxNextLevelOverlappingBytes
* AddLiveFiles (previously AddLiveFilesCurrentVersion())
* NeedSlowdownForNumLevel0Files
The diff continues on (and depends on) D15171
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong, emayanke
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15183
Summary:
With column families VersionSet will not have a constant number of levels (each CF can have different options), so we'll need to eliminate call to VersionSet::NumberLevels()
This diff decreases number of callsites, but we're not there yet. It associates number of levels with Version (each version is associated with single CF) instead of VersionSet.
I have also slightly changed how VersionSet keeps track of manifest size.
This diff also modifies constructor of Compaction such that it takes input_version and automatically Ref()s it. Before this was done outside of constructor.
In next diffs I will continue to decrease number of callsites of VersionSet::NumberLevels() and also references to current_
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15171
Summary: To reduce mutex contention caused by DBImpl.NewInternalIterator(), in this function, move all the iteration creation works out of mutex, only leaving object ref and get.
Test Plan:
make all check
will run db_stress for a while too to make sure no problem.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: igor, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14589
Conflicts:
db/db_impl.cc
Summary:
When doing CompactRange(), we should first flush the memtable and then calculate max_level_with_files. Also, we want to compact all the levels that have files, including level `max_level_with_files`.
This patch fixed the unit test.
Test Plan: Added a failing unit test and a fix, so it's not failing anymore.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14421
Summary:
I will submit a sequence of diffs that are preparing master branch for column families. There are a lot of implicit assumptions in the code that are making column family implementation hard. If I make the change only in column family branch, it will make merging back to master impossible.
Most of the diffs will be simple code refactorings, so I hope we can have fast turnaround time. Feel free to grab me in person to discuss any of them.
This diff removes number of level check from VersionEdit. It is used only when VersionEdit is read, not written, but has to be set when it is written. I believe it is a right thing to make VersionEdit dumb and check consistency on the caller side. This will also make it much easier to implement Column Families, since different column families can have different number of levels.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15159
Summary: When building batch group, don't actually build a new batch since it requires heavy-weight mem copy and malloc. Only store references to the batches and build the batch group without lock held.
Test Plan:
`make check`
I am also planning to run performance tests. The workload that will benefit from this change is readwhilewriting. I will post the results once I have them.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15063
Summary: We use SanitizeOptions() to set appropriate values for some options, based on other options. So we should use the sanitized options by default. Luckily it hasn't caused a bug yet, but can result in a bug in the fugture.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14103
Summary: Currently in DBImpl::MakeRoomForWrite(), we do "versions_->NumLevelFiles(0) >= options_.level0_slowdown_writes_trigger" to check whether the writer thread needs to slow down. However, versions_->NumLevelFiles(0) is slightly more expensive than we expected. By caching the result of the comparison when installing a new version, we can avoid this function call every time.
Test Plan:
make all check
Manually trigger this behavior by applying universal compaction style and make sure inserts are made slow after there are certain number of files.
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, igor
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: nkg-, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15141
Summary:
In one of CPU profiles, we see some CPU costs of string::reserve() inside Batch.Put(). This patch should be able to reduce some of the costs by allocating sufficient buffer before hand.
Since it is a trivial percentage of CPU costs, I didn't find a way to show the improvement in one of the benchmarks. I'll deploy it to same application and do the same CPU profiling to make sure those CPU costs are reduced.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, nkg-
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15135
Summary:
Added an option (max_successive_merges) that can be used to specify the
maximum number of successive merge operations on a key in the memtable.
This can be used to improve performance of the "get" operation. If many
successive merge operations are performed on a key, the performance of "get"
operations on the key deteriorates, as the value has to be computed for each
"get" operation by applying all the successive merge operations.
FB Task ID: #3428853
Test Plan:
make all check
db_bench --benchmarks=readrandommergerandom
counter_stress_test
Reviewers: haobo, vamsi, dhruba, sdong
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: zshao
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14991
Summary: Currently, even if statistics is not enabled, StopWatch only for the stats still gets the time of the day, which is wasteful. This patch adds a new option to StopWatch to disable this get in this case.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14703
Summary:
Code was always compressing L0 files written by a memtable flush
when compression was enabled. Now this is done when
min_level_to_compress=0 for leveled compaction and when
universal_compaction_size_percent=-1 for universal compaction.
Task ID: #3416472
Blame Rev:
Test Plan:
ran db_bench with compression options
Revert Plan:
Database Impact:
Memcache Impact:
Other Notes:
EImportant:
- begin *PUBLIC* platform impact section -
Bugzilla: #
- end platform impact -
Reviewers: dhruba, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14757
Summary:
The way DBImpl::TEST_CompactRange() throttles down the number of bg compactions
can cause it to deadlock when CompactRange() is called concurrently from
multiple threads. Imagine a following scenario with only two threads
(max_background_compactions is 10 and bg_compaction_scheduled_ is initially 0):
1. Thread #1 increments bg_compaction_scheduled_ (to LargeNumber), sets
bg_compaction_scheduled_ to 9 (newvalue), schedules the compaction
(bg_compaction_scheduled_ is now 10) and waits for it to complete.
2. Thread #2 calls TEST_CompactRange(), increments bg_compaction_scheduled_
(now LargeNumber + 10) and waits on a cv for bg_compaction_scheduled_ to
drop to LargeNumber.
3. BG thread completes the first manual compaction, decrements
bg_compaction_scheduled_ and wakes up all threads waiting on bg_cv_.
Thread #1 runs, increments bg_compaction_scheduled_ by LargeNumber again
(now 2*LargeNumber + 9). Since that's more than LargeNumber + newvalue,
thread #2 also goes to sleep (waiting on bg_cv_), without resetting
bg_compaction_scheduled_.
This diff attempts to address the problem by introducing a new counter
bg_manual_only_ (when positive, MaybeScheduleFlushOrCompaction() will only
schedule manual compactions).
Test Plan:
I could pretty much consistently reproduce the deadlock with a program that
calls CompactRange(nullptr, nullptr) immediately after Write() from multiple
threads. This no longer happens with this patch.
Tests (make check) pass.
Reviewers: dhruba, igor, sdong, haobo
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14799
Summary:
We don't want two threads to clash if they concurrently call DisableFileDeletions() and EnableFileDeletions(). I'm adding a counter that will enable file deletions only after all DisableFileDeletions() calls have been negated with EnableFileDeletions().
However, we also don't want to break the old behavior, so I added a parameter force to EnableFileDeletions(). If force is true, we will still enable file deletions after every call to EnableFileDeletions(), which is what is happening now.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sanketh
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14781
Summary: I'm not sure what's the purpose of encoding file number to a new buffer for looking up the table cache. It seems to be unnecessary to me. With this patch, we point the lookup key to the address of the int64 of the file number.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, igor, kailiu
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14811
Summary:
In some places we have NotFound status created with empty message, but it doesn't avoid a malloc. With this patch, the malloc is avoided for that case.
The motivation of it is that I found in db_bench readrandom test when all keys are not existing, about 4% of the total running time is spent on malloc of Status, plus a similar amount of CPU spent on free of them, which is not necessary.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14691
Summary:
Instead of locking and saving a DB state, we can cache a DB state and update it only when it changes. This change reduces lock contention and speeds up read operations on the DB.
Performance improvements are substantial, although there is some cost in no-read workloads. I ran the regression tests on my devserver and here are the numbers:
overwrite 56345 -> 63001
fillseq 193730 -> 185296
readrandom 771301 -> 1219803 (58% improvement!)
readrandom_smallblockcache 677609 -> 862850
readrandom_memtable_sst 710440 -> 1109223
readrandom_fillunique_random 221589 -> 247869
memtablefillrandom 105286 -> 92643
memtablereadrandom 763033 -> 1288862
Test Plan:
make asan_check
I am also running db_stress
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14679
Summary:
For some tests I want to cache the database prior to running other tests on the same invocation
of db_bench. The readtocache test ignores --threads and --reads so those can be used by other tests
and it will still do a full read of --num rows with one thread. It might be invoked like:
db_bench --benchmarks=readtocache,readrandom --reads 100 --num 10000 --threads 8
Task ID: #
Blame Rev:
Test Plan:
run db_bench
Revert Plan:
Database Impact:
Memcache Impact:
Other Notes:
EImportant:
- begin *PUBLIC* platform impact section -
Bugzilla: #
- end platform impact -
Reviewers: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14739
Summary: I realized that "D14409 Avoid sorting in Version::Get() by presorting them in VersionSet::Builder::SaveTo()" is not done in an optimized place. SaveTo() is usually inside mutex. Move it to Finalize(), which is called out of mutex.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: igor, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14607
Summary: It seems to be a decision tradeoff in current codes: we make a malloc for every Get() to reduce one malloc for a flush inside mutex. It takes about 5% of CPU time in readrandom tests. We might consider the tradeoff to be the other way around.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, igor
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14697
