Summary:
In one of CPU profiles, we see some CPU costs of string::reserve() inside Batch.Put(). This patch should be able to reduce some of the costs by allocating sufficient buffer before hand.
Since it is a trivial percentage of CPU costs, I didn't find a way to show the improvement in one of the benchmarks. I'll deploy it to same application and do the same CPU profiling to make sure those CPU costs are reduced.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, nkg-
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15135
Summary: The application can set a callback function, which is applied on the previous value. And calculates the new value. This new value can be set, either inplace, if the previous value existed in memtable, and new value is smaller than previous value. Otherwise the new value is added normally.
Test Plan: fbmake. Added unit tests. All unit tests pass.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: sdong, kailiu, xinyaohu, sumeet, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14745
Summary:
In some use cases, table readers for all live files should always be cached. In that case, there will be an opportunity to avoid the table cache look-up while Get() and NewIterator().
We define options.max_open_files = -1 to be the mode that table readers for live files will always be kept. In that mode, table readers are cached in FileMetaData (with a reference count hold in table cache). So that when executing table_cache.Get() and table_cache.newInterator(), LRU cache checking can be by-passed, to reduce latency.
Test Plan: add a test case in db_test
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: dhruba, igor, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15039
Summary: Full list constructed for full iterator can be leaked. This was a bug introduced when I copy the full iterator codes from hash skip list to hash link list. This patch fixes it.
Test Plan: Run valgrind test against db_test and make sure the memory leak is fixed
Reviewers: kailiu, haobo
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: igor, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15093
Summary: Currently, even if statistics is not enabled, StopWatch only for the stats still gets the time of the day, which is wasteful. This patch adds a new option to StopWatch to disable this get in this case.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14703
Conflicts:
db/db_impl.cc
Summary:
Implement a mem table, in which keys are hashed based on prefixes. In each bucket, entries are organized in a sorted linked list. It has the same thread safety guarantee as skip list.
The motivation is to optimize memory usage for the case that prefix hashing is primary way of seeking to the entry. Compared to hash skip list implementation, this implementation is more memory efficient, but inside each bucket, search is always linear. The target scenario is that there are only very limited number of records in each hash bucket.
Test Plan: Add a test case in db_test
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: igor, nkg-, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14979
Summary:
The way DBImpl::TEST_CompactRange() throttles down the number of bg compactions
can cause it to deadlock when CompactRange() is called concurrently from
multiple threads. Imagine a following scenario with only two threads
(max_background_compactions is 10 and bg_compaction_scheduled_ is initially 0):
1. Thread #1 increments bg_compaction_scheduled_ (to LargeNumber), sets
bg_compaction_scheduled_ to 9 (newvalue), schedules the compaction
(bg_compaction_scheduled_ is now 10) and waits for it to complete.
2. Thread #2 calls TEST_CompactRange(), increments bg_compaction_scheduled_
(now LargeNumber + 10) and waits on a cv for bg_compaction_scheduled_ to
drop to LargeNumber.
3. BG thread completes the first manual compaction, decrements
bg_compaction_scheduled_ and wakes up all threads waiting on bg_cv_.
Thread #1 runs, increments bg_compaction_scheduled_ by LargeNumber again
(now 2*LargeNumber + 9). Since that's more than LargeNumber + newvalue,
thread #2 also goes to sleep (waiting on bg_cv_), without resetting
bg_compaction_scheduled_.
This diff attempts to address the problem by introducing a new counter
bg_manual_only_ (when positive, MaybeScheduleFlushOrCompaction() will only
schedule manual compactions).
Test Plan:
I could pretty much consistently reproduce the deadlock with a program that
calls CompactRange(nullptr, nullptr) immediately after Write() from multiple
threads. This no longer happens with this patch.
Tests (make check) pass.
Reviewers: dhruba, igor, sdong, haobo
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14799
Summary: this diff only replace the cases when we need to frequently create vector with small amount of entries. This diff doesn't aim to improve performance of a specific area, but more like a small scale test for the autovector and see how it works in real life.
Test Plan:
make check
I also ran the performance tests, however there is no performance gain/loss. All performance numbers are pretty much the same before/after the change.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14985
Summary: I made some cleanup while reading the source code in `db`. Most changes are about style, naming or C++ 11 new features.
Test Plan: ran `make check`
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15009
Summary:
The rule file is forked from that in Facebook's repo.
I'll add format file for now and team members can tune the rules later.
In this patch, I made only two changes in order to be consistent with existing coding style
`SpacesBeforeTrailingComments: 2`
`ColumnLimit: 80`
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15015
Summary: Added a script that prepares the repo for facebook's new rocksdb release, which will automatically do some necessary work to make sure this repo is ready for 3rdparty release.
Test Plan:
Run this script and observed:
* new version was created (both in local and remote repo) as a git tag.
* build_version.cc was updated
* build_detect_platform was changed so that it won't create any new change.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, sdong, igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15003
Summary:
We don't want two threads to clash if they concurrently call DisableFileDeletions() and EnableFileDeletions(). I'm adding a counter that will enable file deletions only after all DisableFileDeletions() calls have been negated with EnableFileDeletions().
However, we also don't want to break the old behavior, so I added a parameter force to EnableFileDeletions(). If force is true, we will still enable file deletions after every call to EnableFileDeletions(), which is what is happening now.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sanketh
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14781
Summary: I'm not sure what's the purpose of encoding file number to a new buffer for looking up the table cache. It seems to be unnecessary to me. With this patch, we point the lookup key to the address of the int64 of the file number.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, igor, kailiu
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14811
Summary:
In some places we have NotFound status created with empty message, but it doesn't avoid a malloc. With this patch, the malloc is avoided for that case.
The motivation of it is that I found in db_bench readrandom test when all keys are not existing, about 4% of the total running time is spent on malloc of Status, plus a similar amount of CPU spent on free of them, which is not necessary.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14691
Summary:
A vector that leverages pre-allocated stack-based array to achieve better
performance for array with small amount of items.
Test Plan:
Added tests for both correctness and performance
Here is the performance benchmark between vector and autovector
Please note that in the test "Creation and Insertion Test", the test case were designed with the motivation described below:
* no element inserted: internal array of std::vector may not really get
initialize.
* one element inserted: internal array of std::vector must have
initialized.
* kSize elements inserted. This shows the most time we'll spend if we
keep everything in stack.
* 2 * kSize elements inserted. The internal vector of
autovector must have been initialized.
Note: kSize is the capacity of autovector
=====================================================
Creation and Insertion Test
=====================================================
created 100000 vectors:
each was inserted with 0 elements
total time elapsed: 128000 (ns)
created 100000 autovectors:
each was inserted with 0 elements
total time elapsed: 3641000 (ns)
created 100000 VectorWithReserveSizes:
each was inserted with 0 elements
total time elapsed: 9896000 (ns)
-----------------------------------
created 100000 vectors:
each was inserted with 1 elements
total time elapsed: 11089000 (ns)
created 100000 autovectors:
each was inserted with 1 elements
total time elapsed: 5008000 (ns)
created 100000 VectorWithReserveSizes:
each was inserted with 1 elements
total time elapsed: 24271000 (ns)
-----------------------------------
created 100000 vectors:
each was inserted with 4 elements
total time elapsed: 39369000 (ns)
created 100000 autovectors:
each was inserted with 4 elements
total time elapsed: 10121000 (ns)
created 100000 VectorWithReserveSizes:
each was inserted with 4 elements
total time elapsed: 28473000 (ns)
-----------------------------------
created 100000 vectors:
each was inserted with 8 elements
total time elapsed: 75013000 (ns)
created 100000 autovectors:
each was inserted with 8 elements
total time elapsed: 18237000 (ns)
created 100000 VectorWithReserveSizes:
each was inserted with 8 elements
total time elapsed: 42464000 (ns)
-----------------------------------
created 100000 vectors:
each was inserted with 16 elements
total time elapsed: 102319000 (ns)
created 100000 autovectors:
each was inserted with 16 elements
total time elapsed: 76724000 (ns)
created 100000 VectorWithReserveSizes:
each was inserted with 16 elements
total time elapsed: 68285000 (ns)
-----------------------------------
=====================================================
Sequence Access Test
=====================================================
performed 100000 sequence access against vector
size: 4
total time elapsed: 198000 (ns)
performed 100000 sequence access against autovector
size: 4
total time elapsed: 306000 (ns)
-----------------------------------
performed 100000 sequence access against vector
size: 8
total time elapsed: 565000 (ns)
performed 100000 sequence access against autovector
size: 8
total time elapsed: 512000 (ns)
-----------------------------------
performed 100000 sequence access against vector
size: 16
total time elapsed: 1076000 (ns)
performed 100000 sequence access against autovector
size: 16
total time elapsed: 1070000 (ns)
-----------------------------------
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, chip
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14655
Summary: The previous patch is wrong. rep_.resize(kHeader) just resets the header portion to zero, and should not cause a re-allocation if g++ does it right. I will go ahead and revert it.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14793
Summary: tmp_batch_ will get re-allocated for every merged write batch because of the existing resize in WriteBatch::Clear. Note that in DBImpl::BuildBatchGroup, we have a hard coded upper limit of batch size 1<<20 = 1MB already.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14787
Summary:
Some changes to PlainTable format:
(1) support variable key length
(2) use user defined slice transformer to extract prefixes
(3) Run some test cases against PlainTable in db_test and table_test
Test Plan: test db_test
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu
CC: dhruba, igor, leveldb, nkg-
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14457
Summary:
Instead of locking and saving a DB state, we can cache a DB state and update it only when it changes. This change reduces lock contention and speeds up read operations on the DB.
Performance improvements are substantial, although there is some cost in no-read workloads. I ran the regression tests on my devserver and here are the numbers:
overwrite 56345 -> 63001
fillseq 193730 -> 185296
readrandom 771301 -> 1219803 (58% improvement!)
readrandom_smallblockcache 677609 -> 862850
readrandom_memtable_sst 710440 -> 1109223
readrandom_fillunique_random 221589 -> 247869
memtablefillrandom 105286 -> 92643
memtablereadrandom 763033 -> 1288862
Test Plan:
make asan_check
I am also running db_stress
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14679
Summary:
For some tests I want to cache the database prior to running other tests on the same invocation
of db_bench. The readtocache test ignores --threads and --reads so those can be used by other tests
and it will still do a full read of --num rows with one thread. It might be invoked like:
db_bench --benchmarks=readtocache,readrandom --reads 100 --num 10000 --threads 8
Task ID: #
Blame Rev:
Test Plan:
run db_bench
Revert Plan:
Database Impact:
Memcache Impact:
Other Notes:
EImportant:
- begin *PUBLIC* platform impact section -
Bugzilla: #
- end platform impact -
Reviewers: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14739
Summary:
db_test should be the first to execute because it finds the most bugs.
Also, when third parties report issues, we don't want ldb error message, we prefer to have db_test error message. For example, see thread: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/25
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14715
