Summary:
I had to make number of changes to the code and Makefile:
* Add `make lib`, that will create static library without debug info. We need this to avoid growing binary too much. Currently it's 14MB.
* Remove cpuinfo() function and use __SSE4_2__ macro. We actually used the macro as part of Fast_CRC32() function.
As a result, I also accidentally fixed this issue: https://www.facebook.com/groups/rocksdb.dev/permalink/549700778461774/?stream_ref=2
* Remove __thread locals in OS_MACOSX
Test Plan: `make lib PLATFORM=IOS`
Reviewers: ljin, haobo, dhruba, sdong
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17475
Summary:
* Add java api for rocksdb::WriteBatch and rocksdb::WriteOptions, which are necessary components
for running benchmark.
* Add java test for org.rocksdb.WriteBatch and org.rocksdb.WriteOptions.
* Add remove() to org.rocksdb.RocksDB, and add put() and remove() to RocksDB which take
org.rocksdb.WriteOptions.
Test Plan: make jtest
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, dhruba
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17373
Summary:
* [java] Add a java api for rocksdb::Options, currently only supports create_if_missing.
* [java] Add a test for RocksDBException in RocksDBSample.
Test Plan: make jtest
Reviewers: haobo, sdong
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17385
Summary:
This patch stores gps locations in rocksdb.
Each object is uniquely identified by an id. Each object has
a gps (latitude, longitude) associated with it. The geodb
supports looking up an object either by its gps location
or by its id. There is a method to retrieve all objects
within a circular radius centered at a specified gps location.
Test Plan: Simple unit-test attached.
Reviewers: leveldb, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, tecbot, haobo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15567
Summary:
This diff contains a simple jni library for rocksdb which supports open, get,
put and closeusing default options (including Options, ReadOptions, and
WriteOptions.) In the usual case, Java developers can use the c++ rocksdb
library in the way similar to the following:
RocksDB db = RocksDB.open(path_to_db);
...
db.put("hello".getBytes(), "world".getBytes();
byte[] value = db.get("hello".getBytes());
...
db.close();
Specifically, this diff has the following major classes:
* RocksDB: a Java wrapper class which forwards the operations
from the java side to c++ rocksdb library.
* RocksDBException: ncapsulates the error of an operation.
This exception type is used to describe an internal error from
the c++ rocksdb library.
This diff also include a simple java sample code calling c++ rocksdb library.
To build the rocksdb jni library, simply run make jni, and make jtest will try to
build and run the sample code.
Note that if the rocksdb is not built with the default glibc that Java uses,
java will try to load the wrong glibc during the run time. As a result,
the sample code might not work properly during the run time.
Test Plan:
* make jni
* make jtest
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, sdong, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17109
Summary:
@kailiu mentioned on meeting yesterday that we sometimes have trouble opening DB created by old version with the new version. This will be very important to test for column families, since I'm changing disk format for the MANIFEST.
I added a tool that can help us test that. Usage:
./db_sanity_test <path> create
will create a bunch of DBs under <path>
<change RocksDB version>
./db_sanity_test <path> verify
will verify consistency of DBs created under <path>
Test Plan: ran the db_sanity_test
Reviewers: kailiu, dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb, kailiu, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16605
Summary:
this is the key component extracted from diff: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14271
I separate it to a dedicated patch to make the review easier.
Test Plan: added a unit test and passed it.
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16245
Summary:
This is not a generic thread local implementation in the sense that it
only takes pointer. But it does support multiple instances per thread
and lets user plugin function to perform cleanup when thread exits or an
instance gets destroyed.
Test Plan: unit test for now
Reviewers: haobo, igor, sdong, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, kailiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16131
Summary: A simple benchmark that simulates WAL append. It can be used to test different platform/file system's performance on WAL.
Test Plan: run it.
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: igor, dhruba, i.am.jin.lei, yhchiang, leveldb, nkg-
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16239
Summary:
Add a test to verify HashLinkList and HashSkipList (mainly for the former one) returns the correct results when inserting the same bucket in the different orders.
Some other changes:
(1) add the test to test list
(2) fix compile error
(3) add header
Test Plan: ./prefix_test
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: igor, yhchiang, i.am.jin.lei, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16143
Summary: Fix table_reader_bench after some interface changes. Add it to make to avoid future breaking
Test Plan: make table_reader_bench and run it with different options.
Reviewers: kailiu, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: igor, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16107
Summary: To speed up the compilation while allowing us to compile in debug mode.
Test Plan:
make: see -O2 enabled
make dbg: didn't see -O2
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15969
Summary:
In new third-party release tool, `LIBNAME=<customized_library> make`
will not really change the LIBNAME.
However it's very odd that the same approach works with old third-party
release tools. I checked previous rocksdb version and both librocksdb.a
and librocksdb_debug.a were correctly generated and copied to the
right place.
Test Plan:
`LIBNAME=hello make -j32` generates hello.a
`make -j32` generates librocksdb.a
Reviewers: igor, sdong, haobo, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15555
Summary:
Previous we made `make release` also compile shared library. However it takes a long time to complete.
To make our development process more efficient. I added a new make target shared_lib.
User can of course run `make <library_name>` for direct compilation. However the <library_name> changed under certain condition. Thus we need `make shared_lib` to get rid of the memorization from users' side.
Test Plan: make shared_lib
Reviewers: igor, sdong, haobo, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15309
Compiling the shared libraries took a long time. Thus to speed up the development speed, it still makes sense to be separated from regular compilation.
Summary:
Added a script that reformat only the affected lines in a given diff.
I planned to make that file as pre-commit hook but looks it's a little bit more difficult than I thought. Since I don't want to spend too much time on this task right now, I eventually added a "make command" to achieve this with a few additional key strokes.
Also make the clang-format solely inherited from Google's style -- there are still debates on some of the style issues, but we can address them later once we reach a consensus.
Test Plan: Did some ugly format change and ran "make format", all affected lines are formatted as expected.
Reviewers: igor, sdong, haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15147
Summary:
Per request, some users need to use dynamic rocksdb library instead of static one.
However currently the dynamic libraries have to be manually compiled by default, which is inconvenient. I made dymamic libraries to be compiled by default.
Test Plan: make clean; make; make clean;
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, dhruba, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15117
Summary:
This diff provides basic implementations of CreateColumnFamily(), DropColumnFamily() and ListColumnFamilies(). It builds on top of https://reviews.facebook.net/D14733
It also includes a bug fix for DBImplReadOnly, where Get implementation would be redirected to DBImpl instead of DBImplReadOnly.
Test Plan: Added unit test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15021
Summary:
A vector that leverages pre-allocated stack-based array to achieve better
performance for array with small amount of items.
Test Plan:
Added tests for both correctness and performance
Here is the performance benchmark between vector and autovector
Please note that in the test "Creation and Insertion Test", the test case were designed with the motivation described below:
* no element inserted: internal array of std::vector may not really get
initialize.
* one element inserted: internal array of std::vector must have
initialized.
* kSize elements inserted. This shows the most time we'll spend if we
keep everything in stack.
* 2 * kSize elements inserted. The internal vector of
autovector must have been initialized.
Note: kSize is the capacity of autovector
=====================================================
Creation and Insertion Test
=====================================================
created 100000 vectors:
each was inserted with 0 elements
total time elapsed: 128000 (ns)
created 100000 autovectors:
each was inserted with 0 elements
total time elapsed: 3641000 (ns)
created 100000 VectorWithReserveSizes:
each was inserted with 0 elements
total time elapsed: 9896000 (ns)
-----------------------------------
created 100000 vectors:
each was inserted with 1 elements
total time elapsed: 11089000 (ns)
created 100000 autovectors:
each was inserted with 1 elements
total time elapsed: 5008000 (ns)
created 100000 VectorWithReserveSizes:
each was inserted with 1 elements
total time elapsed: 24271000 (ns)
-----------------------------------
created 100000 vectors:
each was inserted with 4 elements
total time elapsed: 39369000 (ns)
created 100000 autovectors:
each was inserted with 4 elements
total time elapsed: 10121000 (ns)
created 100000 VectorWithReserveSizes:
each was inserted with 4 elements
total time elapsed: 28473000 (ns)
-----------------------------------
created 100000 vectors:
each was inserted with 8 elements
total time elapsed: 75013000 (ns)
created 100000 autovectors:
each was inserted with 8 elements
total time elapsed: 18237000 (ns)
created 100000 VectorWithReserveSizes:
each was inserted with 8 elements
total time elapsed: 42464000 (ns)
-----------------------------------
created 100000 vectors:
each was inserted with 16 elements
total time elapsed: 102319000 (ns)
created 100000 autovectors:
each was inserted with 16 elements
total time elapsed: 76724000 (ns)
created 100000 VectorWithReserveSizes:
each was inserted with 16 elements
total time elapsed: 68285000 (ns)
-----------------------------------
=====================================================
Sequence Access Test
=====================================================
performed 100000 sequence access against vector
size: 4
total time elapsed: 198000 (ns)
performed 100000 sequence access against autovector
size: 4
total time elapsed: 306000 (ns)
-----------------------------------
performed 100000 sequence access against vector
size: 8
total time elapsed: 565000 (ns)
performed 100000 sequence access against autovector
size: 8
total time elapsed: 512000 (ns)
-----------------------------------
performed 100000 sequence access against vector
size: 16
total time elapsed: 1076000 (ns)
performed 100000 sequence access against autovector
size: 16
total time elapsed: 1070000 (ns)
-----------------------------------
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, chip
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14655
Summary:
db_test should be the first to execute because it finds the most bugs.
Also, when third parties report issues, we don't want ldb error message, we prefer to have db_test error message. For example, see thread: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/25
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14715
