According to the "VESA Enhanced EDID Standard", all GTF compliant
displays are continuous frequency.
The GTF support flags in 'Display Range Limits Descriptor' cannot be
used if the display is a non-continuous frequency multi-mode display.
Closes#1105
Signed-off-by: Pascal VITOUX <vitoux.pascal@gmail.com>
Fixes: 6a79a737 ("xfree86: add drm modes on non-GTF panels")
Reviewed-by: Aaron Ma aaron.ma@canonical.com
Rather than trying to create a gamma ramp array of the appropriate size in
drmmode_crtc_init when the GAMMA_LUT property should be used, just flag the crtc
as wanting to use the GAMMA_LUT property and then replace the gamma ramp later,
right before calling xf86HandleColormaps. This avoids a problem during initial
startup where xf86RandR12CreateObjects12 hard-codes a gamma ramp size of 256,
causing xf86RandR12CrtcSetGamma to read past the end of the DIX layer's RandR
gamma ramp array:
PreInit
drmmode_pre_init
drmmode_crtc_init
crtc->gamma_size = 1024
ScreenInit
xf86CrtcScreenInit
xf86RandR12Init
xf86RandR12Init12
xf86RandR12CreateObjects12
RRCrtcCreate
randr_crtc->gammaSize = 0
xf86RandR12InitGamma(pScrn, 256)
RRCrtcGammaSetSize
randr_crtc->gammaSize = 256
xf86RandR12InitGamma
xf86RandR12CrtcInitGamma
RRCrtcGammaSet
xf86RandR12CrtcSetGamma
// crtc->gamma_size is 1024 here, while randr_crtc->gammaRed
// is a 256-element array.
memcpy(crtc->gamma_red, randr_crtc->gammaRed, crtc->gamma_size * sizeof(crtc->gamma_red[0]));
drmmode_setup_colormap
xf86HandleColormaps
xf86RandR12InitGamma
RRCrtcGammaSetSize
randr_crtc->gammaSize = 1024
Fixes: 245b9db0 - modesetting: Use GAMMA_LUT when available
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1126
Signed-off-by: Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Morell <rmorell@nvidia.com>
This helps on KAME-based systems which want to get rid of this hack.
The assumption is that if sin6_scope_id is set, then the interface index
is no longer embedded in the address.
Signed-off-by: Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <jca@wxcvbn.org>
The xkb spec defines that the 7th element of the DeviceValuator key
action description is "valuator 2 value".
This error most likely was accidentally introduced as a copy-paste error
in edeb033f29.
Signed-off-by: Povilas Kanapickas <povilas@radix.lt>
This brings the behavior closer than what we currently have with
autotools-based build system.
Meson does not currently have native support for symlinks.
See https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/1602.
Signed-off-by: Povilas Kanapickas <povilas@radix.lt>
Meson gets confused when there are two targets of the same name within
the same directory, so we use a different intermediate name.
This is a problem with the Xorg SUID wrapper which has the same filename
as the real Xorg executable and is configured in the same meson.build
file. This commit works around this by using a different filename in
build stage and renaming only when installing.
Signed-off-by: Povilas Kanapickas <povilas@radix.lt>
In both cases we check for width > 0 just above, and the variable is not
modified between the checks, so the condition is always true.
Signed-off-by: Povilas Kanapickas <povilas@radix.lt>
This bumps the minimum Wayland version to 1.5 (released in 2014).
Signed-off-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@mupuf.org>
When using autoconf/automake to build Xwayland, the actual path to
Xwayland is not fully qualified and refers to the "exec_prefix".
As a result, the path provided by the generated pkg-config file is wrong
when using autoconf to build the Xserver.
Fix the xwayland.pc file to also set the variable "prefix" and
"exec_prefix" so that the path to Xwayland is fully resolved.
Add those variables to the meson build as well for good measure.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
Since commit 20c78f38, we use the relative pointer for enter/leave
events.
However, sprite_check_lost_focus() which verifies whether the pointer has
left an Xwayland surface still explicitly check for the absolute
pointer.
As a result, no LeaveNotify event is emitted anymore now when the
pointer crosses from an Xwayland surface to a Wayland native one.
Make sure to check the last slave device against get_pointer_event() as
well, not just the absolute pointer.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@mupuf.org>
Acked-by: Roman Gilg <subdiff@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Roman Gilg <subdiff@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Fixes: 20c78f38 - xwayland: use get_pointer_device() for enter/leave
handling too
The code path added by commit 69e4b8e6 (xfree86: attempt to autoconfig
gpu slave devices (v3)) assumes that it will only be run if the primary
device on the screen is the first device in xf86configptr->conf_device_lst.
While this is true most of the time, there are two specific cases where
this assumption fails.
First, if the first device in conf_device_lst is assigned to a different
seat than the running X server, it will be skipped by the previous
FIND_SUITABLE macro usage. Second, if the primary device was explicitly
assigned to the screen but auto_gpu_device is still set and no secondary
devices were explicitly listed, that device may not be the first device
in conf_device_lst.
When the first device in conf_device_lst is not the primary device
assigned to the screen, two problems emerge. First, the first device in
conf_device_lst will never be assigned to the screen as a secondary
device. Second, the primary device is additionally assigned to the
screen as a secondary device. The combination of these problems causes
certain otherwise valid configurations to be invalid. For example, if a
primary device is assigned to a screen and a secondary device is listed
in the config but not explicitly assigned to the screen, then one order
of the device sections results in a usable PRIME or Reverse PRIME setup
and the other order does not.
This commit removes the assumption that the primary device is the first
device in conf_device_lst by starting the loop from the start of
conf_device_lst and skipping the primary device when it is encountered.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Cherry <jcherry@nvidia.com>
Xwayland won't emulate XWarpPointer requests if the cursor is visible,
this is to avoid having the cursor jumping on screen and preventing
random X11 clients from controlling the pointer in Wayland, while
allowing games which use that mechanism with a hidden cursor to work in
Xwayland.
There are, however, games which tend to do it in the wrong order, i.e.
show the cursor before moving the pointer, and because Xwayland will not
allow an X11 client to move the pointer while the cursor is visible, the
requests will fail.
Add a workaround for such X11 clients, when the cursor is being shown,
keep it invisible until the cursor is actually moved. This way, X11
clients which show their cursor just before moving it would still have a
chance to succeed.
v2: Add a timeout to show the cursor for well behaved clients.
v3: Some cleanup (Michel)
v4: Do not cancel cursor delay when updating the cursor to avoid
delaying cursor visibility indefinitely if the client keeps
settings different cursors (Michel)
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jaap Buurman jaapbuurman@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/734
A change during the 1.20 development cycle resulted in fbconfigs being walked
and deallocated individually during __glXScreenDestroy. This change
now avoids a use-after-free caused by that change.
==50859==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x00010d3819c8 at pc 0x0001009d4230 bp 0x00016feca7a0 sp 0x00016feca798
READ of size 8 at 0x00010d3819c8 thread T5
#0 0x1009d422c in __glXScreenDestroy glxscreens.c:448
#1 0x10091cc98 in __glXAquaScreenDestroy indirect.c:510
#2 0x1009d2734 in glxCloseScreen glxscreens.c:169
#3 0x100740a24 in dix_main main.c:325
#4 0x10023ed50 in server_thread quartzStartup.c:65
#5 0x199ae7fd0 in _pthread_start+0x13c (libsystem_pthread.dylib:arm64e+0x6fd0)
#6 0x199ae2d38 in thread_start+0x4 (libsystem_pthread.dylib:arm64e+0x1d38)
0x00010d3819c8 is located 200 bytes inside of 12800-byte region [0x00010d381900,0x00010d384b00)
freed by thread T5 here:
#0 0x101477ba8 in wrap_free+0x98 (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:arm64e+0x3fba8)
#1 0x1009d4240 in __glXScreenDestroy glxscreens.c:449
#2 0x10091cc98 in __glXAquaScreenDestroy indirect.c:510
#3 0x1009d2734 in glxCloseScreen glxscreens.c:169
#4 0x100740a24 in dix_main main.c:325
#5 0x10023ed50 in server_thread quartzStartup.c:65
#6 0x199ae7fd0 in _pthread_start+0x13c (libsystem_pthread.dylib:arm64e+0x6fd0)
#7 0x199ae2d38 in thread_start+0x4 (libsystem_pthread.dylib:arm64e+0x1d38)
previously allocated by thread T5 here:
#0 0x101477e38 in wrap_calloc+0x9c (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:arm64e+0x3fe38)
#1 0x100925a40 in __glXAquaCreateVisualConfigs visualConfigs.c:116
#2 0x10091cb24 in __glXAquaScreenProbe+0x224 (X11.bin:arm64+0x100730b24)
#3 0x1009cd840 in xorgGlxServerInit glxext.c:528
#4 0x10074539c in _CallCallbacks dixutils.c:743
#5 0x100932a70 in CallCallbacks callback.h:83
#6 0x100932478 in GlxExtensionInit vndext.c:244
#7 0x10020a364 in InitExtensions miinitext.c:267
#8 0x10073fe7c in dix_main main.c:197
#9 0x10023ed50 in server_thread quartzStartup.c:65
#10 0x199ae7fd0 in _pthread_start+0x13c (libsystem_pthread.dylib:arm64e+0x6fd0)
#11 0x199ae2d38 in thread_start+0x4 (libsystem_pthread.dylib:arm64e+0x1d38)
Regressed-in: 4b0a3cbab1
CC: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <jeremyhu@apple.com>
It violates @autoreleasepool best practices, and this helps collapse quartzCocoa.m into quartz.c
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <jeremyhu@apple.com>
There is a place where this code was called on the main thread.
We're using a rather nasty anti-pattern to just call a block inline rather
than synchonously calling it on the main thread if we're already on the main
thread. This code could use a good overhaul, but I don't have time to rip
it apart right now. This will address the immediate issue.
Fixes: https://github.com/XQuartz/XQuartz/issues/40
Fixes: https://github.com/XQuartz/XQuartz/issues/48
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <jeremyhu@apple.com>
This fixes an problem left in f682e0563f
due to an incorrect cherry-pick.
We must use old listener->listener to deliver the touch event. Otherwise
grab won't let the event through and the abovementioned commit has no
effect.
Signed-off-by: Povilas Kanapickas <povilas@radix.lt>
In Weston, clicking the window decoration of an Xwayland client gives us a
wl_pointer.button event immediately followed by a wl_pointer.leave event.
The leave event does not contain any button state information, so the button
remains logically down in the DIX.
Once the pointer button is released, a wl_pointer.enter event is sent with
the current button state (zero). This needs to trigger a ButtonRelease event
but for that we need to ensure that the device is the same as the one we send
ButtonPress events through.
Fixes a regression introduced in a4095162ca.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Trying to change the pointer control settings on a device without
PtrFeedbackPtr would be a bug and a crash in the Xserver.
Guard against that case by returning early with a BadImplementation
error, that might kill the X11 client but the Xserver would survive.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Related: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1137
Trying to change the acceleration/threshold on Xwayland cannot work, and
the corresponding handler xwl_pointer_control() is a no-op.
Yet, an X11 client trying to change those on the touch device may
possibly cause a crash because the touch device in Xwayland doesn't set
that.
Initialize the touch device's PtrFeedback to make sure that just cannot
happen.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1137
We are using the relative pointer for motion events, but buttons and
axis events still go through the absolute pointer device.
That means additional DeviceChanged events that could be avoided if the
buttons and axis events were coming from the same device as motion
events.
Route those events to the relative pointer if available so that motion,
buttons and axis events come from the same device (most of the time).
Suggested-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Related: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1130
The relative pointer only has 2 axis, if we want to route the mouse
wheel events to that device, we need to add the axis definition, similar
to what is done for the absolute pointer.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Related: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1130
Pascal VITOUX
Aaron Plattner
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Povilas Kanapickas
Simon Ser
Michel Dänzer
Jan Beich
Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
Matthieu Herrb
Olivier Fourdan
Jacob Cherry
Peter Hutterer