This lets us explicitly specify the range of vertices that are used,
which the OpenGL driver can use for optimization. Particularly,
it results in lower CPU overhead with Mesa-based drivers.
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64912
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: He Junyan <junyan.he@inbox.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com>
After increase to gcc4.7, it reports more warnings, now
fix them.
Signed-off-by: Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Junyan He<junyan.he@linux.intel.com>
The trapezoid generating speed of the shader is relatively
slower when the trapezoid area is big. We fallback when
the trapezoid's width and height is bigger enough.
The big traps number will also slow down the render because
of the VBO size. We fallback if ntrap > 256
Signed-off-by: Junyan He <junyan.he@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-By: Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com>
It seems that the following statement cann't run as expected on SNB.
bool trap_left_vertical = (abs(trap_left_vertical_f - 1.0) <= 0.0001);
Have to rewrite it to another style to let the vertical edge trapezoid
to be rendered correctly.
Reviewed-by: Junyan He <junyan.he@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com>
In some cases we allocate the VBO but have no vertex to
emit, which cause the VBO fail to be released. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Junyan He <junyan.he@linux.intel.com>
The precise mode of trapezoid rendering need to sample the trapezoid on
the centre points of an (2*n+1)x(2*n-1) subpixel grid. It is computationally
expensive in shader, and we use inside area ratio to replace it.
The result has some difference, and we just use it if the polymode == Imprecise.
Signed-off-by: Junyan He <junyan.he@linux.intel.com>
Because some uniform variables need to be set for every
trapezoid rendering, we can not use vbo to render multi
trapezoids one time, which have performance big loss.
We now add attributes which contain the same value to bypass
the uniform variable problem. The uniform value for one
trapezoid will be set to the same value to all the vertex
of that trapezoid as an attribute, then in FS, it is still
a constant.
Signed-off-by: Junyan He <junyan.he@linux.intel.com>
For the componentAlpha with PictOpOver, we use two pass
rendering to implement it. Previous implementation call
two times the glamor_composite_... independently which is
very inefficient. Now we change the control flow, and do
the two pass internally and avoid duplicate works.
For the x11perf -rgb10text, this optimization can get about
30% improvement.
Signed-off-by: Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com>
We find in some cases the trapezoid will be render as a triangle and
the left edge and right edge will cross with each other just bellow
the top or over the bottom. The distance between the cross poind and
the top or bottom is less than pixman_fixed_1_minus_e, so after the
fixed converted to int, the cross point has the same value with the
top or botton and the triangle should not be affected. But in our
clip logic, the cross point will be clipped out. So add a logic
to fix this problem.
Signed-off-by: Junyan He <junyan.he@linux.intel.com>
Because when mask depth is 1, there is no Anti-Alias at all,
in this case, the directly render can work well and it is faseter.
Signed-off-by: Junyan He <junyan.he@linux.intel.com>
We firstly get the render area by clipping the trapezoid
with the clip rect, then split the clipped area into small
triangles and use the composite logic to generate the result
directly. This manner is fast but have the problem that
some implementation of GL do not implement the Anti-Alias
of triangles fill, so the edge sometimes has sawtooth. It is
not acceptable when use trapezoid to approximate circles and
wide lines.
Signed-off-by: Junyan He <junyan.he@linux.intel.com>
We seperate the composite to two phases, firstly to
select the shader according to source type and logic
op, setting the right parameters. Then we emit the
vertex array to generate the dest result.
The reason why we do this is that the shader may be
used to composite no only rect, trapezoid and triangle
render function can also use it to render triangles and
polygens. The old function glamor_composite_with_shader
do the whole two phases work and can not match the
new request.
Signed-off-by: Junyan He <junyan.he@linux.intel.com>
The old manner of trapezoid render uses pixman to
generate a mask pixmap and upload it to the GPU.
This effect the performance. We now use shader to
generate the temp trapezoid mask to avoid the
uploading of this pixmap.
We implement a anti-alias manner in the shader
according to pixman, which will caculate the area
inside the trapezoid dividing total area for every
pixel and assign it to the alpha value of that pixel.
The pixman use a int-to-fix manner to approximate but
the shader use float, so the result may have some
difference.
Because the array in the shader has optimization problem,
we need to emit the vertex of every trapezoid every
time, which will effect the performance a lot. Need to
improve it.
Signed-off-by: Junyan He <junyan.he@linux.intel.com>
Create the file glamor_trapezoid.c, extract the logic
relating to trapezoid from glamor_render.c to this file.
Signed-off-by: Junyan He <junyan.he@linux.intel.com>