1.5 KiB
Errata (Design Decisions)
Reasoning Behind the Order of Preferred Random Data Sources
The order is:
libsodium if available
fread() /dev/urandom if available
mcrypt_create_iv($bytes, MCRYPT_DEV_URANDOM)
COM('CAPICOM.Utilities.1')->GetRandom()
If libsodium is available, we get random data from it. This is the preferred method on all OSes, but libsodium is not very widely installed, so other fallbacks are available.
Next, we read /dev/urandom
(if it exists). This is the preferred file to read
for random data for cryptographic purposes for BSD and Linux.
Despite strongly urging people not to use mcrypt in their projects,
because libmcrypt is abandonware and the API puts too much responsibility on the
implementor, we prioritize mcrypt_create_iv()
with MCRYPT_DEV_URANDOM
above
the remaining implementations.
The reason is simple: mcrypt_create_iv()
is part of PHP's ext/mcrypt
code,
and is not part libmcrypt
. It actually does the right thing:
- On Unix-based operating systems, it reads from
/dev/urandom
, which unlike/dev/random
is the sane and correct thing to do. - On Windows, it reads from
CryptGenRandom
, which is an exclusively Windows way to get random bytes.
If we're on Windows and don't have access to mcrypt
, we use CAPICOM.Utilities.1
.
As of random_compat 1.3, we no longer fall through to OpenSSL.