Summary:
Previously the only way to increment a handle's refcount was to invoke Lookup(), which (1) did hash table lookup to get cache handle, (2) incremented that handle's refcount. For a future DeleteRange optimization, I added a function, Ref(), for when the caller already has a cache handle and only needs to do (2).
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1761
Differential Revision: D4397114
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 9addbe5
Summary:
Improve cache options logging to info log.
Also print the value of
cache_index_and_filter_blocks_with_high_priority.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1709
Differential Revision: D4358776
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 8f030a0
Summary:
Add option to block based table to insert index/filter blocks to block cache with priority. Combined with LRUCache with high_pri_pool_ratio, we can reserved space for index/filter blocks, make them less likely to be evicted.
Depends on D61977.
Test Plan: See unit test.
Reviewers: lightmark, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, march, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D62241
Summary:
Add mid-point insertion functionality to LRU cache. Caller of `Cache::Insert()` can set an additional parameter to make a cache entry have higher priority. The LRU cache will reserve at most `capacity * high_pri_pool_pct` bytes for high-pri cache entries. If `high_pri_pool_pct` is zero, the cache degenerates to normal LRU cache.
Context: If we are to put index and filter blocks into RocksDB block cache, index/filter block can be swap out too early. We want to add an option to RocksDB to reserve some capacity in block cache just for index/filter blocks, to mitigate the issue.
In later diffs I'll update block based table reader to use the interface to cache index/filter blocks at high priority, and expose the option to `DBOptions` and make it dynamic changeable.
Test Plan: unit test.
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, sdong, lightmark
Reviewed By: lightmark
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, march, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D61977
Summary: ... so that I can include the header and create LRUCache specific tests for D61977
Test Plan:
make check
Reviewers: lightmark, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D62145
