Move size validation after depth validation, and only validate size if
the bpp of the pixmap format is > 8. If bpp < 8 then we're already
protected from overflow by the width and height checks.
The correct thing would be to return the ClientPointer. However, if the client
for some reason has a core grab on another device (e.g. as result of a passive
grab), return the coordinates of the grabbed device instead.
This makes the use of nautilus a bit saner.
If the window being changed is set as the motion hint window for any device,
the device's motion hint window is set to NULL. Which is kinda what the old
code did, except that it did it with only the VCP.
Composite uses an unmap/map cycle to trigger backing pixmap allocation
and cliprect recomputation when a window is redirected or unredirected.
To avoid protocol visible side effects, map and unmap events are
disabled temporarily. However, when a window is unmapped it is also
removed from grabs and loses focus, but these state changes are not
disabled.
This change supresses the unmap side effects during the composite
unmap/map cycle and fixes this bug:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488264
where compiz would cause gnome-screensaver to lose its grab when
compiz unredirects the fullscreen lock window.
This is a significant shift in how input events are perceived. The common
approach was to treat a core event as a different entity than the XI event.
This could result in the XI event being delivered to a different client than
the core event. This doesn't work nicely if they come from the same device.
Instead, we treat an input event as a single event, that is delivered through
two separate APIs. So when delivering an event, we first try the XI event,
then the core event. If the window want's neither, we go to the parent and
repeat. Once either core or XI has been delivered, the processing stops.
Important: Different to the previous method, if a client registers for core
button events, the parent window will not get XI events. This should only
cause problems when you're mixing core and XI events, so don't do that!
Generic events don't fit into this yet, they cause me headaches.
This should restore the correct passive grab processing. When checking for
passive grabs, the core event is emulated and we check first for XI grabs on
the window, then for core grabs. Regardless of which event activates the grab,
the XI event is stored in the device's EQ.
When replaying the event, we take the XI event and replay it on the next
window, again including the emulation of the core event.
